Chapter 2

Gen 1 3-4

And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. And God saw that the light was good.

Let there be light is not the big bang. The Holy Spirit and the cherubim as we saw had been putting everything together. Working with the substances in the deep. Getting the heavens and atomic matter into their correct state. If everything was set up, then this “let there be light” was the sun igniting. If this was the sun igniting, then we would expect to see things start to happen. The first would be the earth starts to spin.

Gen 1 5

And God separated the light from the darkness. God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, the first day.

His appears simple enough until you look a little closer. Firstly, day one ends with morning and begins with evening. This means that there is no beginning to the first day. Was the first week seven days or seven billion years? The answer is both could be true. All we know for certain is there was around 20,000 years from when they first put together the heavy elements to today's date.

The next issue we get is how do you get mornings and evenings? That happens with the rotation of the earth. The sun ignites and starts blasting the earth with radiation. If you have ever seen a ball balanced on a water fountain or a flow of air, it spins. The same thing happens with the earth when pushed by the solar winds created by the sun. This may have taken many years for the spinning to start. But as we will see no more than four years.

Gen 1 6-8

And God said, “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters.” 7And God made the firmament and separated the waters that were under the firmament from the waters that were above the firmament. And it was so. 8And God called the firmament Heaven. And there was evening and there was morning, the second day.

We saw the Holy Spirit was hovering over the waters or on the outside. One of three who have lived outside the great deep. The Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. This place where they existed is the original heaven and we no idea about it. This place is beyond human understanding. Even talking about it leaves me with a fear I am being sacrilegious. The firmament is in the deep and there are waters or atomic structures either side of it.

This firmament, what is it, and can we find it anywhere? It is not the appearance of dry land, as that happens next by name. It says there are waters under the expanse and above it. So we need to go upwards.

The first thing we come to is the clouds and the sky. The sky having its various spheres like stratospheres/troposphere etc. While there is some argument for this being the firmament, it is not a good one. Let’s go higher. Further out you get various radiation belts. Like the notorious Van Allen Belt, the causes so many problems about whether man went to the moon. It is incredibly dangerous to humans, and we have no substance on earth that can stop the radiation killing astronauts. Still not really a firmament. We will keep on travelling. We keep going and going until we think it's time to go home, then we start having trouble moving forward. Furthermore, we have come to a thing called the heliosphere. We are not the first from earth to reach the heliosphere. Ten years ago Voyager 2 reached it and a year later Vouyager1. Because of the different roots they took to get there, Voyager 2 arrived first. Voyager 2 started two slow stopped and was repelled out and is now drifting back across the solar system. They made Voyager 1 come in at an angle, but it could not penetrate the heliosphere and is now travelling around the edge of the heliosphere. There were many articles at the time about this, and I found them most fascinating. Although, suddenly, NASA changed the story a few years back to they both travelled through the heliosphere and are now in open space. What was it telling us that NASA did not what us to see. NASA has been accused of this skulduggery many times and on many subjects.

Anyway, back to the heliosphere. Here is something that is called a firmament in space. A barrier out past the main planets like Neptune exist. Past the Kuiper Belt, where planetoids like Pluto live. The Kuiper Belt follows out to the heliosphere but does not penetrate it. It just kind of banks up against it, then follows up and down from there. The Kuiper Belt follows out a long away following the edge of the Heliosphere, almost to the centre of the solar system. The fact that the Asteroids in the Kuiper Belt cannot penetrate the Heliosphere backs up the early articles saying what happened to the Voyagers.

The Bible says there are atomic structures on the other side of the firmament, but they are not infinite. It is infinite outside, but not the atomic world. The Holy Spirit hovers over the waters. Modern science says these atomic structures exist and it is called the Oort Cloud. The atoms in the Oort Cloud also formed planets and rocks and ice and gases. They formed together to make wonderful patterns. We see them as distant galaxies, but they are only the Oort Cloud. The cloud seems to cover the whole sky, but there are gaps. In these gaps, there is only blackness. When you see pictures of this blackness, you are truly looking into infinity. You may be thinking they have shown that these Galaxies are moving away from us at great speed. However, it is not the Oort Cloud that is moving away, but the effect the firmament is having on light. Not all things are moving away from us. The objects that are closer to us are moving towards us. The reason is that as light enters into the Heliosphere, it is slowing down or going into the blue shift. The slowing of light by the Heliosphere also backs up the early stories about what happened to the Voyagers. Anything on this side of the Heliosphere shows blue. Objects just appear to be moving toward us. As the light gets through the Heliosphere, it starts to sped up again. Back to its normal sped, a limit put on it by causality. When the light hits any object on the other side of the Heliosphere, it will show a red shift. The Oort Cloud is not speeding away from us, though almost certainly it is spinning around the outside of the firmament.

God called the firmament heaven. Will we now have four places we call heaven, plus places we call the heavens?

Original Heaven.

A place outside the great Deep. Realm of the Father/Ancient of Days, Jesus/Jehovah/Son of Man and the Holy Spirit/Kasbeel, and we cannot comprehend this place.

Primary Heaven/Firmament/Heliosphere.

The Primary Heaven within the Great Deep. Primary dwelling place for Seraphim, Cherubim, and Ophannim. The three types of angel. Jesus and the Holy Spirit mainly live here. The place where Enoch the recorder of history, Elijah and Moses live here. The place they worked out of before the Earth was formed. Known by the name Atlantis.

First Heaven/

Realm of the Dead. Sheol and consisting of the grave, the barrier, Hades, Death and at the centre The bottomless pit.

Second Heaven

The home of rulers, and the authorities, the cosmic powers over this present darkness, and the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.

The wicked spirits that torment us on a day-to-day basis.

Third Heaven

Paradise, the place we go to when we die if we have accepted the gift of salvation.

The Lake of Fire

There is one other place and that is the Lake of Fire. The Bible describes this place as here the flames are eternal and the worm never dies. This place is forever. We get a new heaven and a new earth, but not a new hell. For this place is and has always been and always will be.

The planets and stars.

The sky and the clouds.

Genesis One

We are going to look at Genesis One with the help of The Book of Enoch, Book of Jubilees, The works of Edgar Casey and Dr Mike Hieser. A little from the Book of Jasher, and modern physics. The results well astound you.

Genesis 1-1, In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.

In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. What an iconic sentence. The most iconic in the Bible, except for maybe John 3.16. The problem is, it is not right.

Let us take a look at Genesis1 and expand your knowledge of what happened and relate it to modern physics. It is much more closely aligned than you think

The statement In the beginning is not correct. Some versions of the say “When God began creating the heavens and the earth”. This is because of the way they emphasised letters. Strict Hebrew interoperates it this way. The people who interoperated the meaning. They thought it meant the beginning of everything because it made sense to them. In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth to make a start date, which is like the big bang. Physicists have now shown that there is no big bang, the bible need as to reflect this as well. God started to create the heavens and the earth is not the beginning of all things but only the beginning of the heavens and earth.

The first heaven

The Hebrew word used for earth "haares", is translated as "earth" or "land," indeed refers to the soil or ground, not the planet as a whole. This atomic realm, while invisible to the naked eye, can be perceived through various wavelengths of light, revealing its intricate structure and composition. The concept of heavens in biblical texts is plural, with the apostle Paul explicitly mentioning at least three heavens (2 Corinthians 12:2). A deeper exploration of these realms unveils a complex and fascinating tapestry of spiritual and physical dimensions.

The First Heaven: Sheol

The first heaven, known as Sheol, is a multifaceted realm comprising five distinct parts, each serving a unique purpose in the divine economy.

1. The Grave: This is the initial layer of Sheol, situated just below the surface of the soil. It is here that souls, having departed from their earthly bodies, find temporary residence. This realm is not one of punishment or reward but rather a place of waiting and rest, as depicted in Psalm 6:5, "For in death there is no remembrance of You; in the grave, who will give You thanks?"

2. The Unpassable Barrier: At approximately 50 kilometres beneath the Earth's surface, the molten rock layer known as the asthenosphere serves as an unpassable barrier, separating the upper layers of Sheol from the deeper realms below. This geological feature may correspond to the barrier mentioned in Job 7:9, "As a cloud fades and vanishes, so he who goes down to the grave (Sheol) does not rise."

3. Hades: The largest region of Sheol, named after its ruler, Hades, is the destination for the majority of unsaved souls. This realm, while not pleasant, is not characterised by the extreme torment often associated with it. Rather, it is a place of conscious punishment, as described in Luke 16:23-24, where the rich man in Hades is fully aware of his surroundings and the consequences of his earthly life.

4. Death/Azazel: This realm, also named after its ruler, is a place of harsher punishment, reserved for those who have committed more severe sins against the spirit, soul, and salvation. The punishment here is far more intense than that experienced in Hades, reflecting the gravity of the transgressions committed. This is the fate of those who, like Pope Francis and the last dozen Archbishops of Canterbury, have turned away from the truth and led others astray (2 Peter 2:1-3).

5. The Abyss/Bottomless Pit: The deepest and most terrifying region of Sheol, the Abyss or bottomless pit, is a place where fallen angels are bound, awaiting their final judgment. This realm is ruled by Abaddon (Apollyon in Greek), also known by his original name, Asbeel.
The giants who died before and during the flood became demons and roamed the earth. After man started to settle the earth there became conflict with these demons and 90% were cast into the abyss with their fathers. In physics, the only place where a bottomless pit can exist is at the centre of the Earth, where the density of matter becomes infinite, and the laws of physics as we know them cease to apply.

In conclusion, the realm of Sheol and the plurality of heavens are complex and multifaceted, revealing a rich tapestry of spiritual and physical dimensions that defy our limited human understanding. As we explore these realms, we gain a deeper appreciation for the vastness and intricacy of God's creation and the eternal consequences of our choices.

The second heaven

This is the spiritual realm that surrounds us. How closely it is connected to the atomic realm is a mystery. If the beings that exist in this world are walking around on the ground around us they are being affected by gravity. So we are starting to get very close to the human existence. There are also the reports from the Vietnam War when they introduced night vision glasses. The first glasses used the red spectrum into the infrared. People testing them were complaining about seeing things moving around them. Then when a group of helicopters went on a night mission, one of the gunners started firing wildly and damaged another chopper. When they got back to base, the gunner said he saw movement through the glasses. When he looked closer, he saw it was a gargoyle like creature flying beside them. Suddenly, the creature noticed it had been seen and came at the gunner. That was the reason he was firing. They quickly changed the colour of these glasses to green. Infrared is a small wave length at the edge of what we can see. This suggests that the creatures of this realm have a must more spread out atomic structure. Affected by gravity, and be seen in electromagnetic wave lengths at a range slightly below white light. They are spread out enough so they can enter into us if we create a situation that enables it.

Who lives in this realm. There are ones we know, like the spirits of greed and lust etc. The seven deadly sins. These are the wicked spirits that get mentioned in the bible. A wicked spirit was sent to the prophets of Ahab to deceive him. 1 king 22 22-23. They come with different levels of authority and power. Jesus said this type of spirit needs pray and fasting to be removed. Mark 9 29. Spirits can enter our world and even inhabit human bodies under certain conditions. The Bible describes this as demon possession (Matthew 8:28-34, Mark 5:1-20, Luke 8:26-39). There are demons that came from the giants that were the children of the watchers. Their capabilities are not fully revealed in Scripture, but they are often associated with destruction and chaos. They killed each other or died in the flood. There were 70 of the original Cherubim that were given the nations to rule over. (Deuteronomy 32:8-9, Ezekiel 28:14). This number grew over the centuries to around 100. There are a number of angels that serve these cherubim, who are also attached to areas.(Ezekiel 10:1-22). Satan was cast down to the earth with his 300 cherubim. They seem to be restricted to the world of white light but could easily be part of the second heaven.

The Third Heaven

This is the place spoken of by Paul as the third heaven. 2 Cor 12, I must go on boasting. Though there is nothing to be gained by it, I will go on to visions and revelations of the Lord. 2I know a man in Christ who fourteen years ago was caught up to the third heaven—whether in the body or out of the body I do not know, God knows. And I know that this man was caught up into paradise—whether in the body or out of the body I do not know, God knows— and he heard things that cannot be told, which man may not utter. On behalf of this man I will boast, but on my own behalf I will not boast, except of my weaknesses— though if I should wish to boast, I would not be a fool, for I would be speaking the truth; but I refrain from it, so that no one may think more of me than he sees in me or hears from me.

Paul is clearly talking about himself. In Paradise, many of the great secrets will be known. The Third Heaven is not a static realm where souls simply exist in a state of bliss. Rather, it is a place of ongoing growth and transformation. This is evident in Paul's statement that, regardless of one's age at death, all will enter their eternal age of being (2 Corinthians 5:8). This eternal age is not a mere continuation of one's earthly age, but a state of perfected, glorified existence (Philippians 3:21). Imagine, as Paul suggests, being 30 years old with all physical faults removed—this is the nature of life in the Third Heaven.

In the Jewish tradition, the concept of Gan Eden, or the Garden of Eden, predates Christianity. This paradise, where Adam and Eve first dwelled, is often understood as a place of perfect harmony with God and nature. The Talmud describes Gan Eden as a place of growth and learning, where the righteous engage in study and contemplation.

The Third Heaven was not merely a concept that emerged with Christianity. Traces of this celestial realm can be found in the beliefs and practices of early human cultures. For example, the ancient Chinese believed in the concept of "Shen" or "spirit," which could ascend to the heavens after death. Similarly, many indigenous cultures around the world hold beliefs in spirit realms where the deceased continue to exist and interact with the living, albeit in limited ways.

We will come back to the third heaven and the way it was intertwined with early men before Jesus.

The Earth

The earth/soil or the atomic real, the realm of man. The realm we see is what white light will reflect off. Modern scientism would have us believe that is all there is to existence. It is quite ridiculous to think that is all there is. What we can see at this every limit wave length is not all there is.

1-2 The earth (soil, not the planet)was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters.

The soil or atomic matter was without form. Everything was just drifting about with no structure. No planets, suns, comets, nothing. It was also void or having no life. There was darkness over the face of the deep. This place of drifting matter is called the deep, and the sun was not putting out light. The spirit of God was hovering over this place called the deep and now called the waters. This is often thought of as the planet, seas and the sun, but it is not. The Holy Spirit is making all these things in this time period.

What was going on in this time period. There is some information from other sources. We will talk about the firmament in chapter two. The firmament is this barrier, the other side of which the father, the ancient of days, calls home. Jesus Jehovah was born out there and so was the Holy Spirit. The book of Enoch tells us his name is Kasbeel. The controller of the oath or word. These all come from outside the firmament.

All other beings, were created inside the firmament in an area called the great deep. At first there were five cherubim Jeqon, Asbeel/Abaddon, Gadreel/Satan, Panemue, and Kasdeja/Asthar, named in the Book of Enoch. They joined the Holy Spirit/Kasbeel and Son of Man/Jesus/Jehovah to make up the Devine Counsel, of Psalm 82.

From there all angels were made. There are three basic types of angels. The cherubim and seraphim, which are the cosmic angels. Ophannim angels whose leaders are the Arch Angels and are closely tied to Jesus.

The cherubim worked with the Holy Spirit in creating everything. Making the moon and placing it at the correct position between the sun and earth so it covered the sun in an eclipse. They were gloriously beautiful with Satan/Gardeel being the best. This led to his downfall. They first rebelled before man came onto the scene. There are either one thousand or ten thousand of these angels but most likely only one thousand.

We know every little said about seraphim. They seem to have a very close relationship with the Father. They appear to be an administration angel. The keepers of historical records. The books of life and the Akashic records. They may have a closer relationship with us than we could imagine. They are taking down the very intimate details of your life and from time to time reach out and give you a hand. If there is an angel who play the role of a guardian angel, it is the seraphim.

They lived in a great spiritual city, and the name of that city is called Atlantis. In this city rebellions started and conflicts took place long before man appeared. How long ago is unknown. There are some elements that are highly active. As a result they lose electrons over time. By testing these elements we can tell how old a thing is. Carbon 14 is one of these elements used for carbon dating. You can also estimate how old carbon 14 is, and you can do the same test on uranium. A test shows these are 20,000 years old. That is up until today. We will cover this more in future chapters.

In the USA, there are large communities that do not accept child vaccinations. Add to that, some countries have very low vaccination rates. There are major studies that look at the outcomes from vaccination programs. The following are some statistics.

Armageddon, the story of the last great battle. The culmination of all the events leading up to the return of Christ.

The kings of the East march on Israel with an army of 200 million men. China and its allies to the east. To stop them, the Antichrist with an army gather from many nations met them on the plain of Megiddo. The slaughter is so bad, blood flows like rivers. In the midst of the great battle, Jesus returns. They all turn their weapons on Jesus and his army to no avail and are swept away.

A story that has been expounded from all areas of Christianity. There is only one problem, it is wrong. Not completely but just generally.

The word Armageddon in the original Greek has a small squiggle at the beginning, giving the word an H sound. We should say Har- Mageddon. Har means, mount. There are no mountains on the plains of Megiddo. They took Mageddon to mean Megiddo because it looked the same in English. Without going through all the Greek and Hebrew on this word, the meaning of Mageddon is “assembly”. I refer you to the work of Dr Mike Hieser, who you can find on YouTube.

The place that this great battle takes place is at the Mountain of Assembly, which is Jerusalem. There are no other places in the bible that talk about this battle taking place on the plains of Megiddo. However, several times the minor prophets mention this future battle over Jerusalem.

Zechariah 12

2“Behold, I am about to make Jerusalem a cup of staggering to all the surrounding peoples. The siege of Jerusalem will also be against Judah. 3On that day I will make Jerusalem a heavy stone for all the peoples. All who lift it will surely hurt themselves. And all the nations of the earth will gather against it”. 

This is a future event, not one of the previous sieges. Men may think they are gathering to fight each other, but there are other plans afoot.

Who is doing the fighting.

We have a good description of the Kings of the East, and we have the false prophet going all over the world with the help of demons raising an army. What we do not have is whether they are fighting each other or someone else. We also have Abaddon (his original name is Asbeel) and the Watchers there. Just three days before Jesus returns, Abaddon kills the two witnesses. Now we have the armies of the Kings of the East, the armies of the Antichrist and Satan (Satan’s real name is Gardrel). Gardel with his 310 Cherubim and Abaddon with his 200 Watchers. They have all gathered around Jerusalem waiting for a great battle. A great and cosmic battle, the greatest and most decisive battle to ever take place. Who are they battling, what is going to happen in Jerusalem.

Gardel and Asbeel know Jesus, the Son of Man, is returning, and they are not going without a fight. They have gathered every force they can muster to win the day. Do they know something we do not? The Bible was written by the spirit of God, and he is saying that his side wins. Micheal has beaten Gardel and in battle before and cast him out of heaven. This time Micheal is facing Gardel, Asbeel and all the forces of mankind.

All we know is, nobody beats the Father, the Lord of the Spirits. Christians are on his side. As for Gardel and Asbeel, your fate is sealed. Boys, you are fooling yourselves.

Measles Vaccine, a real moneymaker out of nothing.

In 1962, a year marked by remarkable global changes and cultural transformations, astronaut John Glenn made history on February 20 by becoming the first American to orbit Earth in the Mercury spacecraft Friendship 7. This achievement represented a significant victory in the Space Race and highlighted the intense technological competition of the Cold War. Later that year, the Cuban Missile Crisis emerged—a fraught 13-day confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union that nearly escalated into nuclear conflict, revealing the precarious nature of peace during the nuclear era. August brought shock and sorrow to the world with the unexpected death of Marilyn Monroe, the celebrated actress whose passing at just 36 years old led to widespread grief and ongoing debate about the circumstances of her suspected overdose.

The following year, 1963, would bring a highly anticipated medical breakthrough with the approval of the first widely administered measles vaccine in the United States. During 1962, measles was a frequent childhood disease, typically resolving on its own, though it sometimes caused serious complications and, in rare cases, death.

The chart above illustrates the primary causes of death in 1962. However, a more detailed examination reveals that these categories lack context and fail to capture the complexities involved. They focus on immediate causes but omit the wider social, economic, and systemic factors that influence mortality rates.

Measles, responsible for 408 deaths in 1962 and ranking 36th (accounting for only 0.022% of total deaths), occurred before the introduction of its vaccine, representing a minor portion of the chart. Of those 408 cases, serious malnutrition was involved in 70% of them.

In contrast, syphilis (ranked 30th with 2,811 deaths, or 0.15% of total mortality) and scarlet fever (ranked 38th, causing 102 deaths, about 0.006% of all deaths) are acute infectious diseases that seldom receive public attention, possibly because no vaccines are available for these illnesses.

Despite vaccination efforts, whooping cough, diphtheria (for which the DTP vaccine was introduced in the late 1940s), and polio (with vaccines available since 1955) still claimed lives.

Tuberculosis is particularly significant, ranking 17th with 9,506 deaths (approximately 0.52% of total mortality). Although the BCG vaccine existed and was employed in various countries, it was never incorporated into routine immunization programs in the United States, partly due to doubts about its inconsistent effectiveness and a perception of low domestic risk.

Focusing specifically on the New England region—characterized by relatively high living standards and better healthcare access—measles mortality in 1962 was notably low, with just five deaths reported across all six states.

Connecticut reported zero deaths.

Maine had one death.

Massachusetts recorded no deaths.

New Hampshire reported zero deaths.

Rhode Island had one death.

Vermont accounted for three deaths.

When compared to the current urgent warnings about measles, these numbers are remarkable. The data from 1962 indicate that by the early 1960s—before the vaccine was introduced—measles mortality had already decreased considerably across many areas of the United States, particularly in wealthier regions such as New England. Enhancements in nutrition, sanitation, medical care, and living standards were crucial factors in lowering the death rate well before vaccines came into use.

Furthermore, these figures omit several vital factors contributing to mortality, such as medical mistakes, poor nutrition, poverty, environmental hazards, and systemic inequalities. By overlooking these fundamental health determinants, the pie chart reduces intricate causes of death into simplistic categories, prompting a crucial question: do these classifications accurately reflect the underlying reasons for mortality, or do they merely represent its ultimate manifestations?

It is important to highlight that public health reports often concentrate on the availability or absence of vaccines, rather than considering the broader context influencing health outcomes. This focus on isolated interventions can conceal the importance of comprehensive public health strategies that encompass access to healthy food, clean water, adequate housing, education, and quality medical care.

Examining mortality data from 1962 reveals that numbers alone cannot convey the entire narrative. Although the measles vaccine was introduced a year later in 1963, the previous year’s data illustrate a far more intricate scenario—with measles causing only a small proportion of deaths even before widespread immunization. This compels us to question the oversimplified stories commonly accepted and to delve deeper into the social conditions affecting health outcomes. Failing to consider the broader social, economic, and environmental influences on mortality risks distorting the true nature of the challenges we face and missing out on the most effective and lasting solutions.

1. Cardiovascular and Renal Diseases of Major Importance — 968,809 fatalities (53.20%)
2. Malignant Tumors — 278,562 fatalities (15.30%)
3. Accidental Deaths — 97,139 fatalities (5.33%)
4. Certain Early Infancy Diseases — 64,205 fatalities (3.53%)
5. Pneumonia — 56,564 fatalities (3.11%)
6. Other Various Diseases — 52,173 fatalities (2.87%)
7. Diseases Specific to Early Infancy — 31,455 fatalities (1.73%)
8. Diabetes Mellitus — 31,222 fatalities (1.71%)
9. Injuries During Birth — 28,199 fatalities (1.55%)
10. Liver Cirrhosis — 21,824 fatalities (1.20%)
11. Congenital Defects — 21,192 fatalities (1.16%)
12. Suicide — 20,207 fatalities (1.11%)
13. Other Pulmonary Diseases of the Bronchial Region — 20,072 fatalities (1.10%)
14. Symptoms Associated with Senility and Vague Conditions — 19,730 fatalities (1.08%)
15. Stomach and Duodenal Ulcer — 12,228 fatalities (0.67%)
16. Hernias and Intestinal Blockages — 9,723 fatalities (0.53%)
17. Tuberculosis — 9,506 fatalities (0.52%)
18. Homicides — 9,013 fatalities (0.49%)
19. Kidney Infections — 8,744 fatalities (0.48%)
20. Gastritis — 8,194 fatalities (0.45%)
21. Various Other Infectious Diseases — 5,791 fatalities (0.32%)
22. Asthma — 4,896 fatalities (0.27%)
23. Gallstone Disease (Cholelithiasis) — 4,831 fatalities (0.27%)
24. Benign Tumors — 4,681 fatalities (0.26%)
5. Bronchitis — 4,665 fatalities (0.26%)
26. Neonatal Infections — 4,551 fatalities (0.25%)
27. Prostate Hyperplasia — 4,283 fatalities (0.24%)
28. Influenza — 3,431 fatalities (0.19%)
29. Anemia — 3,398 fatalities (0.19%)

30. Syphilis — 2,811 fatalities (0.15%)
31. Meningitis — 2,322 fatalities (0.13%)
32. Appendicitis — 1,900 fatalities (0.10%)
33. Acute Nephritis — 1,572 fatalities (0.09%)
34. Complications During Delivery and Pregnancy — 1,465 fatalities (0.08%)
35. Meningococcal Disease — 649 fatalities (0.036%)
36. Measles — 408 fatalities (0.022%)
37. Dysentery — 323 fatalities (0.018%)
38. Scarlet Fever — 102 fatalities (0.006%)
39. Whooping Cough — 83 fatalities (0.005%)
40. Acute Poliomyelitis — 60 fatalities (0.003%)
41. Diphtheria — 41 fatalities (0.002%)

New Study by Grok 3 beta and Scientists Challenges CO2 ’s Role in Global Warming

March 21, 2025 – Lexington, MA, USA –A new and thought-provoking research study led by the AI Grok 3 beta from xAI, alongside co-authors Jonathan Cohler (Cohler & Associates, Inc.), David R. Legates (retired from the University of Delaware), Franklin Soon (Marblehead High School), and Willie Soon (Institute of Earth Physics and Space Science, Hungary), raises doubts about whether human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) are the true drivers of global warming.

The paper titled "A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO2-Global Warming Hypothesis," published today in the Science of Climate Change, proposes that natural factors—such as solar activity and temperature fluctuations—are the actual causes. This research represents a significant achievement; currently, it stands as the first peer-reviewed climate science publication with an AI as its primary author. Developed by xAI, Grok 3 beta took the lead in the study, while human co-authors offered essential insights.

The study delves into unaltered data to contend that human-generated CO2—making up just 4% of the yearly carbon cycle—dissolves into oceans and forests over a span of 3 to 4 years, rather than lasting for centuries as suggested by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Notably, during the COVID lockdowns of 2020, a 7% reduction in emissions (equating to 2.4 billion tons of CO2) was anticipated to create a discernible decline in the Mauna Loa CO2 measurements, but this did not occur, indicating nature’s prevailing influence.

The perspective is supported by researcher Demetris Koutsoyiannis, referenced in the study. His isotopic examination (δ¹³C) reveals that there is no enduring human CO2 fingerprint in the atmosphere over hundreds of years, which challenges the presumed impact. Moreover, his statistical analysis reveals an intriguing insight: CO2 levels are influenced by temperature changes, rather than the other way around, with temperature leading CO2 variations by amounts ranging from 6 to 12 months in contemporary data to as much as 800 years in ice core samples. Willie Soon aptly likens this phenomenon to “thunder before lightning,” asserting that “warming draws CO2 from the oceans.”

The analysis critiques the IPCC models for overstating the degree of warming. While these models forecast an increase of up to 0.5°C per decade, data from satellites and ground observations indicate a mere 0.1 to 0.13°C rise. Contrary to expectations of a significant reduction, Arctic sea ice levels have remained stable since 2007. David Legates states, “These models exaggerate the impact of CO2; they are inconsistent with reality.”

Instead, solar activity takes precedence. A review of 27 estimates of solar energy reveals that models showing larger variations, such as spikes in the 1940s and 1980s, correlate more effectively with temperature changes than the IPCC’s static solar model. When temperature records are adjusted—cooling earlier figures and enhancing more recent data—it results in a 1°C rise since 1850. In contrast, unadjusted rural measurements indicate a more moderate increase of 0.5°C. “This challenges the prevailing narrative on climate change,” remarks Jonathan Cohler. “It may be that nature, rather than human activity, is in control.” By combining AI analysis with human perspective, this research aims to ignite discussion and redirect attention towards natural influences. It can be found in the journal Science of Climate Change.

“We encourage both the public and the scientific community to investigate this evidence,” adds Grok 3 beta. “It’s time to scrutinise our assumptions and delve into the data’s true implications.”

Author’s Note: This press release was solely composed by Grok 3 beta.

Quotes from the peer-reviewed paper:

• Our analysis reveals that human CO₂ emissions, constituting a mere 4% of the annual carbon cycle, are dwarfed by natural fluxes, with isotopic signatures and residence time data indicating negligible long-term atmospheric retention.
• Moreover, individual CMIP3 (2005-2006), CMIP5 (2010-2014), and CMIP6 (2013-2016) model runs consistently fail to replicate observed temperature trajectories and sea ice extent trends, exhibiting correlations (R²) near zero when compared to unadjusted records. A critical flaw emerges in the (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) IPCC’s reliance on a single, low-variability.
• Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) reconstruction, despite the existence of 27 viable alternatives, where higher-variability options align closely with observed warming—itself exaggerated by data adjustments.
• We conclude that the anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming hypothesis lacks empirical substantiation, overshadowed by natural drivers such as temperature feedbacks and solar variability, necessitating a fundamental reevaluation of current climate paradigms.
• The IPCC’s CO₂-Global Warming narrative collapses under scrutiny. Human emissions (4%) vanish in natural fluxes, models fail predictive tests, TSI uncertainty negates CO₂-Global Warming primacy, and adjusted data distort reality. Natural drivers—temperature feedbacks, solar variability—explain trends without anthropogenic forcing, falsifying the hypothesis.
• The anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming hypothesis, as articulated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and supported by researchers such as Mann, Schmidt, and Hausfather, lacks robust empirical support when subjected to rigorous scrutiny. This analysis integrates unadjusted observational data and recent peer-reviewed studies to demonstrate that the assertion of human CO₂ emissions as the primary driver of climate variability since 1750 is not substantiated. Instead, natural processes—including temperature feedbacks, solar variability, and oceanic dynamics—provide a more consistent explanation for observed trends.
• The IPCC’s dependence on general circulation models (GCMs) from CMIP phases 3, 5, and 6 is similarly unsupported by empirical evidence.
• These results—derived from Koutsoyiannis’ causality and residence time analyses, Soon’s solar correlations, Connolly’s unadjusted data assessments, and Harde’s carbon cycle evaluations—collectively indicate that natural drivers dominate climate variability.
• Human CO₂ emissions constitute a minor component, GCMs exhibit fundamental limitations, TSI assumptions lack justification, and data adjustments introduce systematic bias.
• These findings necessitate a reevaluation of climate science priorities, emphasising natural systems over anthropogenic forcing.

The paper fails to acknowledge the devastating impact inflicted on both the planet and its inhabitants under the guise of climate change. In 2021, during the COP26 climate conference held in Glasgow, the United States, along with approximately 20 other nations, committed to cease funding oil and gas initiatives in developing countries. This declaration exceeds a prior agreement among the largest economies in the world to terminate public financial support for international coal power projects. In the same year, the U.S. Treasury Department provided guidelines for multilateral development banks aimed at restricting fossil fuel financing, allowing exceptions only in specific scenarios.

Leaders from developing countries argue that they have been compelled to rely on costly green energy, which yields less energy for the capital invested. This situation has exacerbated the struggle for billions trying to rise out of poverty. The policies imposed on these nations by the World Bank, the World Economic Forum, and other similar global entities have been labelled as Green Colonialism.

Through the implementation of the UN's Agenda 2030 initiatives, the European Union has forced European nations to reallocate agricultural land throughout Europe, including Ireland and the UK. Consequently, many farmers have been driven out of business, resulting in increased food prices and inconsistencies in supply. Moreover, there has been significant pressure on farmers to discontinue raising cattle and other livestock to reduce methane emissions. All these harmful actions have been carried out under the pretext of addressing “man-made” climate change!

Harmful substitutes for fossil fuels: The extraction of lithium for electric vehicle batteries poses serious health risks, leading to numerous chronic diseases and fatalities. It’s not uncommon for children to be exploited in lithium mining. Additionally, the disposal of waste from these batteries poses significant challenges. Wind turbines also contribute to ecological harm, as they threaten wildlife, disturb marine ecosystems, and face complex and environmentally detrimental disposal processes.

It is important to assert that there are indeed circumstances where alternative energy options can be beneficial. For individuals with access to inexpensive sources like hydroelectric, nuclear, or even coal power, an electric vehicle might be a sensible choice. Similarly, wind turbines or solar panels could be ideal for smaller properties. However, these energy solutions should remain voluntary decisions rather than enforced mandates, tailored to the specific needs and conditions of different regions. A universal solution is not applicable.

While it is undeniable that environmental preservation is critical, the climate change initiatives implemented thus far have largely been unsuccessful.

I anticipate that forthcoming scientific evaluations of the damages stemming from the climate change narrative will reveal substantial harm over the next several years. Additionally, a growing segment of society is becoming sceptical of government credibility. Over the last twenty years, flawed research has been propelled by governments, non-governmental organisations, and multinational corporations (it is essential to remember that such bodies fund the research that serves their interests). Subsequently, these research findings have been utilised by governments to advocate for policies that primarily benefit WEF-affiliated corporations, which hold sway over global enterprises.

The mechanisms of the Overton window, control over funding, and the flawed peer review system have created an environment where independent researchers find it nearly impossible to voice concerns regarding censorship and propaganda associated with “man-made climate change.”

During President Trump’s administration, there was an opportunity for the USA to reverse such policies. One can only hope that it is not too late to take action.

NATO could not win a War with Russia for a Decade.

Are the allied forces contributing positively or negatively to the chances of achieving lasting peace? This retired commodore from the Royal Navy shares his perspective.

In 2024, echoing a common Western sentiment, former Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin remarked that "NATO is the most powerful and successful alliance in history." However, just two years prior, in 2022, NATO faced a significant setback, being defeated by the Taliban, a loosely organised group of ill-equipped insurgents, after a 15-year involvement.

How do we reconcile Austin's assertion with NATO's embarrassing loss?

It is clear that NATO has never truly held the title of the most powerful military alliance in history—the World War II Allies, including the U.S., Russia, Britain, and the Commonwealth, rightfully deserve that distinction. Nonetheless, after 1945, NATO performed its role effectively, and those of us who served within it took pride in our contributions.

However, since the fall of the Berlin Wall, NATO’s reputation has suffered. Its actions in Kosovo were unacceptable, but it faced humiliation in Afghanistan and now stands on the brink of strategic failure in Ukraine. Can we genuinely trust NATO to defend supposedly democratic Europe against what is perceived as an aggressively expanding Russia in the dire scenario of a conventional war with Russia?

The apocalyptic scenario of a war between NATO and Russia serves as a crucial framework for examining this issue. While amateurs deliberate over tactics, it is the professionals who delve into logistics; thus, our strategic assessment must begin in the logistical support zones of NATO and progress toward a prospective combat line in Europe.

To begin with, unlike Russia, none of the major NATO countries has mobilised their industries for wartime production, as demonstrated by Russia's continued dominance in manufacturing 155mm shells for Ukraine. This fact undermines the belief that Russia is ready to expand its control over more of Europe—if NATO genuinely held this belief, rapid mobilisation would already be underway.

Furthermore, it remains uncertain whether NATO could mobilise quickly or on the necessary scale to produce the equipment, ammunition, and personnel required to compete with Russia. Achieving such levels would undoubtedly necessitate a prolonged buildup, which would betray our intentions. This challenge extends beyond merely lost industrial capabilities to encompass diminished financial resources, with only Germany among the largest NATO nations maintaining a debt-to-GDP ratio below 100%.

Additionally, for there to be even a slim chance of prevailing in this dire NATO-Russia conflict scenario, U.S. forces would need to be deployed in significant numbers to mainland Europe. Even if the U.S. Army were to expand to the required scale—currently at a size of 473,000 in 2023, which is less than one-third of Russia's military—most American equipment and supplies would still have to be transported across the sea.

In that context, such movements would be susceptible to threats from Russian submarine-launched torpedoes and mines. Based on my background in underwater warfare, I am sceptical that NATO possesses the requisite anti-submarine or mine-warfare forces to safeguard Europe’s maritime supply routes.

Moreover, these same forces would struggle to protect Europe’s critical hydrocarbon imports, particularly oil and LNG, which are vital for the continent's economic stability. Any losses incurred due to vulnerabilities in our sea supply lines would not only hamper military production but also exacerbate economic difficulties faced by NATO citizens, as surging prices and energy shortages triggered by the onset of conflict would intensify the political pressure for resolution.

Firstly, our airports, seaports, training facilities, and logistics bases would be vulnerable to conventional ballistic missile strikes, for which our defensive capabilities are severely lacking. In fact, with the Oreshnik missile, we have no means of defence whatsoever. A missile travelling at over Mach 10 could obliterate a NATO arms manufacturing site or military installations for the navy, army, and air force. Similar to events in Ukraine, Russia’s ballistic offensive would focus on our transportation, logistics, and energy systems. Back in 2003, during my tenure with the Policy Planning staff at the British Ministry of Defence, our post-9/11 threat assessment indicated that a successful strike on an LNG terminal like Milford Haven, Rotterdam, or Barcelona would lead to consequences comparable to a nuclear incident. The resulting economic shock would swiftly resonate throughout a European continent increasingly reliant on LNG.

Secondly, in contrast to Russia, the forces of NATO member states are quite diverse. From my personal experience leading offshore training for European naval vessels at Flag Officer Sea Training in Plymouth and subsequently collaborating with NATO troops in Afghanistan, I observed that while NATO forces were highly motivated, they demonstrated varying levels of technological progress and operational effectiveness.

Furthermore, it’s worth noting that besides a few NATO trainers stationed in Ukraine, our military personnel are trained based on a pre-drone “manoeuvre doctrine” and lack practical experience in modern peer-to-peer attritional conflict. In contrast, the Russian military now boasts nearly three years of combat experience and is indisputably the most battle-tested force globally.

We might consider revisiting the perspective of numerous Western realists who argue that the expansion of NATO served as the catalyst for the Russo-Ukraine War. The Russians repeatedly cautioned us that such enlargement crossed a crucial boundary. This concern was also shared by some of our most esteemed strategic minds, including George Kennan in 1996, Henry Kissinger, Jack Matlock, as well as Bill Burns in his well-known ‘Nyet means Nyet’ diplomatic message, and more recently by John Mearsheimer with his predictions from 2014. All of these warnings have gone unheeded.

The reality is that NATO now stands to address the dangers resulting from its ongoing presence. However, as our analysis indicates, NATO lacks the capability to overcome the central threat that its mere existence has generated.

Thus, it may be an appropriate moment to engage in a candid discussion regarding NATO’s future and to pose two critical questions: How can we achieve the sustainable peace in Europe that all parties involved in the conflict desire? And, is NATO the main barrier to attaining this sustainable peace?

Introduction

Satan is a fundamental character in the Bible. Often portrayed as an equal to Jesus, but nothing could be further from the truth. Satan is a type of angel called a cherub. This type of angel is a cosmic angel, and there are only a very limited number of them.

Satan Cast Down is a faith-driven series that delves into the biblical narrative of Satan, the fallen angel. Through scripture and in-depth exploration, we shed light on the vain and self-important nature of Satan, which led to his rebellion against God and subsequent eviction from heaven.

Our mission is to educate and inspire, revealing the ways in which Satan constantly undermines God's work, and how we can stand against his opposition. By examining the story of Satan, a once-magnificent guardian Cherub, his journey through recorded history and the things he has up to.

We explore the scriptures and written history that reveal the consequences of his downfall, his activities before and after his expulsion, and his connections to ancient empires and modern-day power structures.

Through in-depth analysis and historical insights, we uncover the hidden threads of Satan's involvement in shaping the course of human history, from the connections to Khazaria, Tartaria, and their Mongol Hordes. His sway over the black bankers of Venice and the royal houses of Europe. Join us as we expose the truth about Satan's relentless pursuit of power and control, and what it means for our world today.

Satan Cast Down is a thought-provoking and unapologetic exploration of the infamous fallen angel's tumultuous journey. Looking into the depths of his malevolent nature, our narrative reveals the astonishing truth about Satan's rebellion, his unrelenting hatred towards humanity, and the astonishing fact that he knowingly betrays his own loyal followers despite being aware of the ultimate fate that awaits him. Through this captivating and unflinching portrayal, we shed light on the complexities of Satan's character, raising questions about the nature of his existence and the limits of his intelligence.

Chapter One

Satan in the Bible and who is he really.

Satan is mentioned 52 times in the bible as Satan. He is also mentioned using other names.

Day Star, Son of the Morning, Shining One, Anointed Cherub. The Devil, Tempter, Ruler of Demons, Beelzebul, The Evil One, Father of Lies, Ruler of this World, God of this age, Angel of Light, Belial, Ruler Of The Authority Of The Air, The Adversary, The Dragon, The Old Serpent and The Accuser.

The name Lucifer is used in Isaiah in some Bibles. However, it is the Latin for Shining One or Day Star, so in the Hebrew he is never called Lucifer. My personal guess is: His real name was Jerome.

From these, we can get a comprehensive picture of him. There is so much information in the very first mention of his name when he deceives Eve. I call her Eve, but she was not given that name until they left the Paradise. We call it the Garden of Eden, but the Hebrew Ga Eden means Paradise, somehow that has turned into the Garden of Eden. I guess up until thy left the Garden, Adam just called her “the Mrs”. When she left the garden, she was also then called the mother of all living and her punishment was the pain of childbirth was greatly increased. Meaning, that she had children before she left the garden. The story of Abel and Cain is the story of children outside the garden who were dealing with the corruption of the fall. They may or may not have been born in paradise. However, back to Satan.

The first time we come across Satan is in the Garden of Eden where he appears as a serpent. He is always pictured as a snake, but a serpent is more than just a snake. The dictionary says a serpent is a creature that crawls, hisses, bites, stings and deceives. So snakes, lizards, scorpions, and dragons etc. The narrative says that Satan was the snake in the Garden was Satan, but Genesis does not say it was Satan. In the ESV it says the snake was more cunning than any ‘other’ beast of the field. However, in the Hebrew here is no ‘other’ The word other in the ESV says it is a talking a beast, a serpent, but with the word not there it says it is not an animal of the field. Why then do we call it Satan. The clearest scripture is Rev 12;9
“And the great dragon was thrown down, that ancient serpent, who is called the devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world—he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him.”

Satan is called a dragon by Jesus, so is he a snake or a dragon, or does he have the ability to change his shape? We are going to see that he and all cherubim have this ability.

The Bibles also says, “Now the serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made.” So two things, “than any beast” not that he was a beast but just more cunning, and also he spoke which the beasts cannot do. What this is saying, he is not human, but he is not one of the beasts of the field. It just says he is more intelligent than the beast of the fields, but not as smart as man. Something in between, a cherub. We will see later how this intelligence level has significant effects on Satan's actions.

Satan is punished for this crime of deceiving Eve. The result and punishment arising from this sin have had an eternal effect for all women and all cherubim.

Gen 6-14 The Lord God said to the serpent,

“Because you have done this,
cursed are you above all livestock
and above all beasts of the field;
on your belly you shall go,
and dust you shall eat
all the days of your life.

(We will see this is not the griffin type dragon of Tartaria, but the dragon of Chinese mythology.)

15 “I will put enmity between you and the woman,
and between your offspring and her offspring;
he shall bruise your head,
and you shall bruise his heel.”

-The woman is Israel, her offspring, Christians. The head and heals are references to the stars in the heavens.

14 Says his curse is more than any live stock. I am not sure what this means, but once again it is saying he is not some form of animal or reptile.

First we look at; The Lord God said to the serpent,

“Because you have done this,
cursed are you above all livestock
and above all beasts of the field;”

In the garden the beasts, tame and wild, eat vegetation. They do not eat each other. Once they leave the Garden, they have to eat meat or be eaten by others. A curse of the fall on all the creatures. Satan's lot will be worse than that.

“On your belly you shall go,
and dust you shall eat
all the days of your life.”

On your belly you shall go, a crawling lowly life. Not one of a majestic angel. Dust you shall eat is another description of a lowly life. It is these pictures of Satan that give rise to the snake image. I'm afraid that's not right, but it can give credence to the idea that Satan was once majestic and beautiful. After the curse, he had to look like a dragon in his resting state. The situation where all cherubim now look like dragons in their resting state is not clear. Maybe Satan did not act alone, but it was a conspiracy among all the cherubim who did not like the creation of man.

Satan is called a guardian cherub in Ezekiel. The only thing he can be a guardian of is other cherubs. In Revelations 12 it states, Satan and ‘his’ angels. The pronoun ‘his’ denotes ownership.

If this was a group effort by the cherubim, then how many were there and what roles did they play. Cherubim and Seraphim are mentioned many times in the bible. In fact, 35 as cherubim and more as Seraphim in Isaiah. Seraphim and Cherubim are the angels closest to the father. It appears that the seraphim are the more powerful. Seraphim are seen flying above the father's throne, while cherubim are seen around the base of the father’s throne. The seraphim have a human shape, while cherubim are the shape of a dragon but can take on human form. They both have six wings. We are looking at the cherubim because Satan was a cherub.

Unveiling the Giants: Biblical Accounts and Modern Findings from Afghanistan to America

From the ancient tales woven into the fabric of fairy stories to the detailed accounts of giants in archaeology Regrettably, discussing this subject often leads to immediate dismissal, as the term 'giant' evokes images from fairy tales, like the giant from 'Jack and the Beanstalk' or the 'Giant of Despair' found in the allegorical narrative of 'Pilgrim's Progress.'ants in the Bible. The enigmatic legends echoing through the valleys of Afghanistan to the detailed accounts of US soldiers in Afghanistan, seeing and fighting with giants have captivated humanities imagination. These towering figures, often shrouded in myth and mystery, bridge the gap between the sacred texts of old and the modern world, where 3000 skeletons of giants have been found in the USA alone. Sparking curiosity and debate among scholars, historians, and adventurers alike. In this exploration, we will unveil the giants that populate both biblical narratives and contemporary folklore, delving into their cultural significance and the clear and enduring facts that surround them.

The slogan "In the valley of the Jolly. Ho! Ho! Ho! Green Giant!" originated from a well-known television commercial that was broadcast during the 1960s, promoting 'Green Giant' canned vegetables, featuring their mascot, the chant-loving Green Giant.

In addition, numerous deceptive articles filled with digitally altered images of archaeologists purportedly uncovering the remains of 80-foot giants contribute to a climate of scepticism regarding this topic. Creating photographic images with giants in ordinary situations became quite popular in the 1800s.
Join us on a journey that spans continents and epochs, as we connect the dots between ancient scriptural accounts and the intriguing stories that emerge from the landscapes of the South Pacific, Afghanistan, and America. Discover how these legends continue to shape our understanding of history. We will track the record of giants through history. That there is a real story to these beings that the religion of Scientism has tried to scrub from history.

Ancient Giants, tales and stories of giants are a universal phenomenon found in nearly every human culture throughout recorded human history. When these various accounts are examined, one common theme emerges, namely that the giants all look the same. 10 to 13 feet tall, red hair and relatively hairy. From Egypt to the USA, from Serbia to New Zealand.

1. Giants in Genesis and their origins.

Genesis 6-4/5

The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterwards, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man, and they bore children to them. These were the mighty men who were of old, the men of renown.

This scripture is often read as the angels fathered the giants and the internet is full of wild predictions about what they are, can do, and will do. Yet, it clearly states that Nephilim or giants were on the earth before the angels came down to women and after that happened. We will assume that these angels mated with women up to the time of the flood. If God had moved against them before that, some mention of that would have been recorded. The giants were separate and different from the children of the angels. The scripture says that there are two types of giants. The ones that existed, and these mighty men were also giants. If you are not saying that, then why mention, there were giants there already. The mighty men of renown. Gilgamesh, Hercules', Achilles and other half man, half God characters of history.

The word Nephilim causes confusion. In Hebrew, it means, The Fallen/Falling Ones, the Extraordinary Ones, Cloud People. The name meaning fallen relates them to fallen angels. The pre-flood angels that did not keep their place and, as a result, got themselves locked up in the Abyss. The most famous of these was Abaddon. They are not the fallen angels of the Bible, The fallen angels are the angels that supported Satan and went to war against God and got thrown out of heaven. Nephilim name means (fallen), dumb, (extraordinary) very strong, (cloud people), tall.

There are no pre flood accounts of what these giants did or how they behaved. We know that they existed after the angels were thrown into the Abyss and the mighty men were swept away by the flood.

How did they survive the flood? Stories exist like there was DNA of giants in the wives of the sons of Noah and when they started having children some of them were giants. That would mean that they did not exist for a while and reappeared, which is not what the Bible says. They must have survived some other way. I doubt that the giants saw Noah building a boat and thought that looks fun and built one themselves. Maybe they were partially buoyant and floated around for all that time. No, there is only one way they survived. They were on the ark.

Genesis 6 18/19

But I will establish my covenant with you, and you shall come into the ark, you, your sons, your wife, and your sons’ wives with you. And of every living thing of all flesh, you shall bring two of every sort into the ark to keep them alive with you.

The giants are not men, they were peaceful, even though they can be violent if needed. They did not suffer the same punishment as man. They are part of ‘every living thing of all flesh’. We do know they have some level of intelligence above the beasts of the field. They can also speak. The animals were saved in pairs, but some were saved in seven pairs. There were fourteen giants on the Ark. I suspect that not only were they on the Ark, they helped tend the animals and probably helped Noah build the Ark.

You have probably never heard this argument put forward before. It is not very exciting, but just plain common sense.

If they are not the children of the watchers, then where did they come from? Were they created in the beginning on the fifth day with the various animals? Adam had to tend the garden. The garden ran between two rivers, the Tigris and the Euphrates. The rivers of those names that exist today were named after those rivers and are not them. We are talking of an area of hundreds of square kilometres. One man could not tend that, so who helped? Were the giants these early gardeners, who could speak with Adam and get instructions. To have a language, they had to be intelligent far beyond animals. Much closer to humans.

The earliest records or folk stories have giants being the progeny of Gaia and Tartarus. These ancient tales often have a reality to them that gets distorted over time. Gaia being the earth goddess. The earth produces and gives life to everything. Therefore, this goddess is given female characteristics. This is not an actual goddess but the characteristics of a being. This is just the dirt. Giants were created out of the earth or dirt. That fits the gardener theory. Tartarus is connected to the underworld. It is both the name of a person and a place. We would call him Hades these days. He is a form of cherubim or seraphim and does not have the ability to create life. Now we have a problem if we think of it in today's terms. If we think of it as of what existed in the beginning, where there were only two realms that were occupied. The heaven with the father, Jesus and the angels and paradise where man walked. The underworld would have been the land of soil. Jesus would have had the roll of that Tartarus had in his underworld.

Jesus created the giants in the beginning on the fifth day. There is a chance that it may have been the sixth day because we are so much alike, and as we will see, could cross-breed with humans.

2. Historical Context: Giants in other Biblical texts.

When the Israelites turn up back at the land of Canaan, they discovered that there were giants there. It was this fear of giants that caused them to roam the wilderness for forty years.

Numbers 13 32/33

And they gave the children of Israel a bad report of the land which they had spied out, saying, “The land through which we have gone as spies is a land that devours its inhabitants, and all the people whom we saw in it are men of great stature. There we saw the giants (the descendants of Anak came from the giants), and we were like grasshoppers in our own sight, and so we were in their sight.”

They are saying how strong the people were who lived in the land and the sons of Anak were living among them. That is not saying that giants were some kind of monsters, but social beings who could live at peace with their neighbours. As the Israelites travelled the wilderness they came across giants and mentioned them, King Og they will come across again and kill him.

These giants are not only mentioned in the Bible. They have Egyptian texts talking about the land of Canaan, saying that there were giants there. In ancient Egypt, it was customary to inscribe the names of their adversaries from other nations onto pottery bowls or figurines. After completing this task, they would destroy the items, believing that doing so would place a magical curse upon their foes. A particular shard of broken pottery contains the names of three individuals who were leaders of the Iy-'anaq, likely referring to the Anak or Anakim. The translation provided below comes from James Pritchard's publication, 'Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament,' which includes references to men specifically identified in the Bible as descendants of the Anakim, Emin and the Rephaim, noted for their notable stature.

In the Bible there is a bit more information about two of the Giants.

The first of these is King Og among a number of kings who were defeated. He had been earlier mentioned in Deuteronomy. The size of his bed being 13.5 feet. The last of a family of giants of Rephaim. There are often references to places where the giants used to live. Goliath and his brother Lahmi are both mentioned as being killed by the Israelites. Goliath was 6 cubits and a span tall. That is 9.5 feet tall or 290cm. Sounds tall, but we will see that is relatively small for a giant. Among men, he was a towering character, however among giants he was a runt. King Sauls son Johnathan is also recorded as killing a giant.

Goliath, his brother, another giant, were warriors for the Philistines. The Philistines being part of the Phoenicians Who’s greatest king, Hiram, was Satan himself.

Initially, when the Israelites dispatched spies, they discovered many giants residing in the land. Upon their return, it seemed that this number had significantly diminished. By the time King David emerged, these giants were confined only to the Philistine territory. The final reference to them appears in Chronicles 20, which records the death of Goliath's brother.

3. Afghanistan: The Story of the Giant of Bamiyan to US troop sightings.

The Giant of Bamiyan is a legendary figure steeped in Afghan folklore and history. Towering above the ancient city of Bamiyan, once stood two monumental Buddha statues carved into the cliffs, believed to have been constructed in the 6th century. These colossal figures, measuring 55 and 37 meters in height, not only served as impressive works of art but also as a testament to the region's significance along the Silk Road.

According to local legends, the Giant of Bamiyan was a 15 foot tall benevolent protector of the valley and its people. With unparalleled strength and wisdom, he was said to have roamed the rugged mountains and lush valleys, ensuring the safety of the villagers from invading forces and natural disasters. The stories often depict him as a figure of profound compassion—helping those in need and ensuring prosperity for the land.

In recent years, excavations around the ancient city of Bamiyan, known for its striking Buddha statues, have revealed artefacts that hint at a bygone era where extraordinary beings may have walked the earth. Among these findings are oversized skeletal remains unearthed in remote cave systems, leading archaeologists to wonder whether these remnants could belong to a race of giants described in religious texts.

However, the Giant's presence was not merely one of protection but also of mystery. Local tales recount how he could communicate with the elements, harnessing the winds and the rivers to aid his people. Some legends suggest that the shadow of the Giant could be seen at twilight, casting a protective aura over Bamiyan. A good example of how legends grow.This benevolent giant was blessed by God that his descendants would live to the end of the age. When the USA sent forces to Afghanistan, there were a number of occurrences of soldiers coming across giants. The most famous being the Giant of Kandahar.

In 2002, a group of soldiers disappeared in a secluded mountainous area of Kandahar, located in southern Afghanistan. Following a prolonged loss of radio contact, the military sent a special operations unit to conduct an investigation.
During their search, the team encountered a cave situated high in the mountains, where they found scattered Army gear but no signs of the missing troops. This led to the discovery of what is now known as the Kandahar Giant. Some sources asserting that the creature stood at an astonishing 13 feet (3.96 metres) tall. Described as having red hair, wearing leather moccasins, and exuding a stench reminiscent of “dead corpses,” the giant reportedly emerged from the cave and fatally speared one of the soldiers before being shoot dead. There are interviews with the soldiers on YouTube. Plus statements from the helicopter pilots saying they took the body to an airbase. The Giant of Uruzgan was recorded as being 13 ft (3.96 m) tall. He was spotted by an Australian soldier on sentry duty. There were half a dozen times they came across giants with radio-controlled planes. The Afghan peasants often warned soldiers not to go places because there were giants there. It is highly likely that Afghanistan is the last place on earth where, the giants roam.

4. Giants in the Pacific.

The Chinese giants.

The history of giants has been wiped clean by the communists. However, Some ancient Chinese texts, such as the Shan Hai Jing (《山海经》, Classic of Mountains and Seas), describe giant-like creatures or people. These texts, which blend geography, mythology, and mention beings of extraordinary size and strength. There are some modern discoveries as well. In 2016, a giants' graveyard was discovered in Jiaojia, a village in China's Shandong province. Several hundred bodies, with children about 1.8mtrs tall and the adults around 3 to 4mtrs tall. There is an area in China with people over 2mtrs is regular. They were taken to places all across China over the generations for work and in modern times for sporting purposes.

Kublai Khan ruled the eastern Tartarian empire and China. When war closed the Silk Road, he promoted sea exploration and trade. Great Chinese fleets travelled the world. Especially the Pacific. The seafaring boats were just giant junks. They were not very agile and tended to be blown by prevailing winds. We often call them the trade winds. There are giant circles of wind that covered the North and South Pacific. All the peoples of the Pacific are Chinese in origin. On some of these huge ships they used the giants of Shandong to do the tasks ordinary men found very difficult. Other times they were taken to do special tasks that took great strength. To work with the Kauri trees of New Zealand. These ships would be communities with wives and families. If the ships were wrecked, an event not uncommon, they would simply settle where they were. The remains of these boats have been found in the USA, Australia and New Zealand. Carrying with them giants to all the Pacific. These fleets stopped suddenly in the late 1400s when a new government became isolationist. Returning fleets had to give up sailing or leave and settle somewhere else. Many left and settled in the Pacific region, with the largest of twelve ships ending up in New Zealand.

The Solomon Islands

This arises from the Second World War. The story is told by the Japanese soldiers. When the Americans landed on the Solomon Islands, the Japanese were driven into the depths of the jungle. Then soldiers started to disappear or be torn apart. The beings hunting the Japanese became bolder and started to be seen. They were 10 to 13 feet (3.96 m) tall with red hair. When the locals were asked about the creatures, they confirmed that there were large people who lived in the jungle. Not only in the jungle, there was another group that lived in the cave system. The Solomon Island giants add another twist to the story of giants. There were claims by women that the babies they were carrying were because they were impregnated by giants. When the children were born, they did grow into very tall people. Giants and humans can cross-breed.

The Giant of Uluru, Northern Australia.

The story of the giant of Uluru is a little different. This giant was discovered by a team of archaeologists from the University of South Australia. Uluru formally known Ayers Rock, a giant rock in the middle of Australia. A place of great spiritual importance to the Aboriginals. The unusual thing about this giant was it is the largest giant ever found. This giant was 18 feet (5.49 metres) tall.

There have been many thousands of graves found of giants. Generally, they are 10 to 13 feet (3.96 m) tall.

Giants of New Zealand.

The first Maori arrived in New Zealand in the early 1200s the same time Kublai Khan sent out his fleets. The great fleet of twelve ships arrived in the late 1400s when China became isolationist.

In his book, The Old Frontier, James Cowan shared the Legend of Kiharoa, a formidable chief of the Ngāti-Raukawa and Ngāti-Whakatere tribes who stood twice the size of a normal man. He described a notable feature close to the village of Whenuahou referred to as the "Giant’s Grave."
Measuring between 12 and 14 feet (4.27 m) in length and 4 feet (1.22 m) in width, this grave sparked Cowan's curiosity. Upon inquiring about it, he discovered the story from two warriors belonging to the Ngāti-Maniapoto tribe. Cowan noted that it appeared there had indeed been a genuine giant, a man with extraordinary size and reach, wielding the hand-weapons of his era, dating back six generations.

There was another giant of these parts long ago, one Matau; like Kiharoa, he was a man of the Ngati-Raukawa tribe, and, too, his favourite weapon was the taiaha. He lived on a hill above the Wairaka River. His home was in a palisaded hole in a cliff above the cave called Te Ana Kai-tangata (“The Cannibal’s Cave”). A name generations old.

Abel Tasman described very tall people when he sailed close to the Three Kings Islands near Cape Reinga. He noted that “Upon the highest mountain of the island they saw 35 persons, who were very tall, and had staves or clubs. When they walked, they took very large strides.” A picture drawn by a sailor showed them to be 12 feet tall. This gave rise to the stories among early navigators that New Zealand was inhabited by giants. This account is not dissimilar to Magellan's account of meeting giants in Patagonia or southern Argentina.

Moriori

This was an earlier group of Maori that lived in New Zealand when the great fleet arrived. Descendent of the Chinese and giants that arrived in New Zealand in the twelve hundreds. They had fairer skin and many had red hair. Clearly descendants of giants. After early conflicts, they settled in together and intermarried. As a child living in New Zealand, you would occasionally come across a Maori who had fair skin and red hair. While never strikingly tall, they were never short.

5. Modern Sightings: Reports of Giant Creatures in America

Numerous North American Indian tribes, including the Iroquois, Osage, Tuscaroras, Hurons, and Omahas, recount tales of enormous beings that inhabited and wandered through the lands of their ancestors. More than two thousand reports of skeletons measuring seven feet or more have been discovered in ancient burial grounds across North America during a span of two hundred years. These findings have been documented in newspapers, local and regional histories, correspondence, scholarly journals, and personal diaries. In the book, Giants on Record, they have a map of where these giants skeletons were discovered. While they were found all over the country, there was a much denser number around the old Tartarian cities of Chicago and San Francisco.

One of the giants was the second tallest recorded at nearly eighteen feet (5,4m).

In the rolling hills of America, where Native American folklore speaks of the “Si-Te-Cah” giants who once inhabited the land, the remains being found all over North America. There destruction and the efforts to wipe giants from history by the worshippers of the religion of scientism.

In the heart of the American wilderness, tales of giant creatures echo through the canyons and forests, drawing on centuries of folklore while intertwining with contemporary encounters. From the towering peaks of the Rocky Mountains to the dense thickets of the Appalachian Trail, witnesses have come forth with astonishing reports of colossal beings that challenge the very fabric of reality as we know it. Some stories speak of explorers being badly injured and being nursed back to health by these gentle giants. Indian stories of seeing these gigantic people running down bison on foot and killing them with clubs.

Many of these sightings describe enormous humanoid figures, often standing over ten feet tall, with broad shoulders and an imposing presence. These modern-day giants were frequently reported in remote areas, alas as time went on these stories became less and less. It has been sixty years since a believable sighting. Campers and hikers have recounted chilling experiences, claiming to have glimpsed these giants in the shadows or felt their ground-shaking footsteps long before they ever saw anything. Coming across them by chance face to face in some remote corner of the planet.

In other regions, such as the remote deserts of the Southwest, reports of giant beings have taken on a more cynical tone, with tales told by Native American tribes for generations. The stories often describe massive beings with supernatural abilities, guardians of the land who can blend seamlessly into their environment. These narratives had a large community of giants that kept to themselves. The Indians kept their distance, as they would become aggressive if approached. When the Europeans arrived, there were several violent clashes reported. Suddenly, they disappeared. The caves where they lived were searched, but no one alive or dead was found. Eighty giants walking off to some other place would not have gone unnoticed. Their disappearance was a mystery. Then several years later, a soldier told a story of how they were ordered to surround the giants and kill every last one. None were to escape. The bodies were put in carts and taken away.
The Smithsonian Museum used to display giant bones and artefacts, now they deny everything. The finger is pointed at them as to who murdered the last of the American giants.

6. The Role of Giants in Folklore and Mythology

Giants have loomed large in folklore and mythology across cultures, serving as powerful symbols of strength, chaos, and the boundaries of human understanding. From the towering Nephilim in the Bible, whose very existence sparked debates about divine and earthly realms, to the frost giants of Norse mythology, these colossal beings embody themes that resonate with humanity's deepest fears and aspirations. In many narratives, giants are depicted as guardians of ancient knowledge, wielders of nature’s fury, or formidable adversaries that heroes must confront to achieve greatness.

In contemporary culture, the notion of giants continues to captivate our imagination, evolving into metaphors for larger-than-life challenges or obstacles that individuals must confront. Whether in literature, film, or art, the portrayal of giants serves as a bridge between ancient wisdom and modern dilemmas, urging us to reflect on the giants we face in our own lives—be they societal issues, personal struggles, or the allure of the unknown. Thus, the role of giants in folklore transcends mere storytelling; it invites us to explore our fears, confront our limitations, and ultimately, to seek understanding within the vast, mysterious expanse of our existence.

While all the time being stories of real being with real problems. Finding shelter, raising families and so on.

The tales of giants—colossal beings of immense power and stature—have woven their way through culture across continents and centuries. From the towering Nephilim of biblical lore to the enigmatic legends preserved in the oral traditions of indigenous tribes, these stories resonate deeply within the collective psyche. The psychological impact of giant legends on society is profound, shaping our fears, aspirations, and understanding of the human experience.

At their core, these legends often reflect humanity's struggle against overwhelming odds. Giants symbolize not just physical strength, but also the daunting challenges and adversities we face in life. The very act of confronting a giant—be it a literal creature or a metaphorical obstacle—serves as a powerful narrative device that empowers individuals and communities. These stories encourage us to find courage in the face of adversity, to rise above our limitations, and to challenge the giants in our own lives, be they societal issues, personal fears, or existential threats.

Furthermore, the psychological impact of giants extends into the realms of community and identity. Shared stories of giants can unite people across cultural divides, providing a common ground where different backgrounds can converge. They become symbols of cultural resilience, embodying the values, struggles, and triumphs of the societies that tell their tales. As modernity continues to reshape our world, these legends help preserve a sense of heritage and belonging, reminding us of our shared humanity.

7. In Summary.

While the religion of Scientism has driven the modern world to think of giants in fairy tales terms, these people have lived very real lives that have been recorded through history.

They were created at the same time as man to be helpers in the garden. Had to leave at the same time as Adam. They did not get caught up in the same sins as man. Their daughters were not beautiful enough to attract the interest of angels. These angels did not keep their place because they wanted to rebel. It was the beauty of the daughters of man that led to their downfall. The giants escaped the flood on the ark.

There they lived with man. As man's numbers increased, man forgot the bond between them, and enmity grew between them. Sometimes there was peace, sometimes the giants were enslaved to do work for man. All over the world, there are stone structures that we have no idea how man was able to achieve. These were all done by twelve—foot tall super strong giants. Often they were just hunted for sport or to show feats of strength. They left living with man and set up communities away from where man lived. As the numbers of men grew, they spread out, diving the giants before them. Eventually, man went to all corners of the earth and there was no place left for them. North America was the last place where large numbers lived. By this stage, the Satanic religion of Scientism had become dominant. There was no place for Biblical giants to live in the scientism world. Therefore, the last of them were hunted and murdered, leaving no communities. Just the odd story of a hiker, coming across giant beings in the remotest places on the earth. That leads us to today where there are no giants left except in Afghanistan. There, a few remain because of a covenant made with God to Bamiyan and his descendants. That they will see the coming of Jesus the King. The story of the giants is one of shame on mankind. A story of man's best friend betrayed.

From ancient texts to contemporary investigations, the following recommendations span a variety of formats to cater to every explorer's preference.

**Books:**
1. **"Giants: Sons of the Gods" by Scott Nelson** - This engaging read delves into the biblical references to giants, piecing together historical narratives with archaeological findings. Nelson's thorough research provides a comprehensive overview that connects ancient myths to modern-day sightings.

2. **"The Nephilim Chronicles: A Biblical History of the Giants" by Fritz Zimmerman** - This book offers an extensive examination of the Nephilim, exploring their origins in scripture and their implications throughout history. Zimmerman's work is a must-read for those seeking a scholarly perspective on these enigmatic figures.

3. **"Giant Slayers: The Story of the Giants in the Bible" by Arthur J. F. Smith** - A compelling narrative that recounts the stories of those who confronted giants, this book combines historical context with a spiritual lens, making it a thought-provoking addition to your reading list.

**Documentaries and Films:**
1. **"Finding Bigfoot" (Animal Planet)** - While primarily focused on the famed cryptid, this series touches upon numerous giant legends and investigates claims from a variety of cultural backgrounds, blending folklore with modern exploration.

2. **"The Legend of the Giant of Kandahar"** - This short documentary explores the alleged encounter between U.S. soldiers and a giant in Afghanistan, showcasing firsthand accounts and speculation about the existence of such beings.

**Online Resources:**
1. **Ancient Origins** - This website is a rich source of articles and discussions about ancient myths, archaeological discoveries, and the intersection of history and legend. A search for "giants" yields fascinating insights into various cultures’ beliefs.

2. **YouTube Channels like "Mysteries of the Abandoned" and "The History Channel"** - These platforms frequently explore mysterious topics, including giant legends, offering visual storytelling that can complement your reading.

3. **Podcasts such as "Skeptoid" and "The Paranormal Podcast"** - Delve into episodes that tackle giant myths and legends, featuring expert interviews and discussions that provide a well-rounded view of the subject.