There are countless secrets lurking behind the polished promises of the government and the medical establishment—things they’d rather you not question. What they tell you isn’t what’s taking place behind the curtain. Mistakes are quietly swept away, experiments proceed without public consent, and the truth is buried under a web of carefully crafted narratives and simplistic platitudes like “safe and effective.” What you don’t know can hurt you.
Here are nine things you probably don’t know about whooping cough and the whooping cough vaccine—and what the authorities may not want you to find out.
Helpful terms:
· Pertussis: Whooping Cough
· DTwP: Diphtheria, Tetanus, Whole-cell Pertussis vaccine
· DTaP: Diphtheria, Tetanus, Acellular Pertussis vaccine
· Tdap: Tetanus, Diphtheria, Acellular Pertussis vaccine administered to adolescents and adults
1. Nearly 100% Decrease in Death Rate Prior to Vaccination
Records from England and Wales dating back to 1838 show that fatalities due to whooping cough and various infectious diseases were close to non-existent before the introduction of vaccines and antibiotics. Specifically regarding whooping cough, this decline approached 100% before the launch of the DTP vaccine in 1957. In 1977, researcher Gordon T. Stewart noted that there was no indication linking the decrease in cases to the whooping cough vaccination.
From 1937 onwards, a consistent decrease was observed in both genders. The introduction of vaccination against whooping cough started in limited areas around 1948 and expanded nationally in 1957, yet it appears to have had no impact on the decline rate, assuming that a single infection typically grants immunity, similar to many significant childhood infectious diseases. Given that this trend was already firmly in place prior to 1957, there is no indication that vaccination significantly contributed to the reductions in incidence and mortality.
2. Sweden Paused Vaccination; Mortality Rates Remained Steady
Evaluations conducted in Sweden in 1978 revealed that 84% of children diagnosed with pertussis had already received three doses of the vaccine. Consequently, the whole-cell DTP vaccine was considered ineffective. Due to safety concerns surrounding the vaccine, the Swedish health ministry advised halting the whooping cough vaccination in 1979.
In 1978, the National Bacteriological Laboratory in Stockholm documented 5,140 confirmed cases of pertussis. An analysis of a subset revealed that among 620 children aged 1 to 6 years diagnosed with the illness, 521 (84%) had undergone three doses of the pertussis vaccination. Further inquiries indicated that 84% of the 38,015 preschool children born in Sweden between 1974 and 1978 had also received three doses of the pertussis vaccine. Due to the apparent lack of protective efficacy from the Swedish-produced vaccine, immunizations were halted in 1979.
By that time, confidence in the vaccine had significantly eroded, leading to a decrease in its potency until it was ultimately discontinued in 1979 on the basis of ineffectiveness and potential safety concerns. Presently, the incidence of pertussis in Sweden is beginning to revert to levels seen before the immunization period, although cases of the clinical disease are reported to be mild.
A correspondence from Victoria Romanus at the Swedish Institute of Infectious Disease Control reveals that the incidence of fatalities due to whooping cough has remained very low, even in the absence of a nationwide vaccination initiative. Between 1981 and 1993, only 8 child fatalities were attributed to pertussis, resulting in an annual average of approximately 0.6 deaths potentially caused by the disease. The likelihood of succumbing to pertussis in Sweden was about 1 in 13,000,000, even without a national vaccination strategy.
Historical data illustrated in graphs from the 1860s until the initiation of whooping cough vaccinations in 1953 shows that mortality rates from pertussis in Sweden dropped by over 98 percent. During the 17-year period without the pertussis vaccination program from 1979 to 1996, Sweden recorded 7 deaths due to pertussis, compared to 10 fatalities in the preceding 17 years and 9 deaths in the subsequent 17 years after the program resumed. The implementation of pertussis vaccination initiatives did not yield a significant impact on deaths associated with pertussis in Sweden.
3. Decline in Vaccination Rates in England, No Rise in Deaths
An extensive review of the comprehensive official statistics reveals a clear and significant decrease in fatalities from whooping cough from 1902 to 2008. Official records of DTP vaccine coverage in England began in 1970. However, by 1957, when national vaccination efforts were initiated, deaths due to whooping cough had nearly disappeared. In a 1984 publication, the authors observed that even though vaccination rates in England saw a substantial drop from the mid-1970s to the mid-1980s, the death toll remained stable without any increase.
The whooping cough epidemic that occurred in England during 1974-5 impacted a demographic where 80% of children were vaccinated against pertussis. At that period, concerns regarding the whooping cough vaccine led to a significant decline in immunisation rates, resulting in a substantial rise in reported cases. Nonetheless, the death toll has remained stable, and it has been proposed that the severity of the disease might now be reduced.
A research study released in 1984 found that hospitalizations and fatalities from whooping cough had decreased despite a drop in vaccination rates. This outcome contradicted expectations; if the vaccine effectively prevented severe illness, one would anticipate an increase in cases with fewer vaccinations.
Following the reduction in pertussis vaccination, there has been an unforeseen decline in both whooping cough admissions and mortality rates, impacting children of various ages and vaccination statuses alike.
4. The Severity of Whooping Cough Has Diminished
Parents often experience anxiety regarding whooping cough, picturing their children in distress due to severe coughing fits. Nevertheless, in 1981, Gordon T. Stewart characterized whooping cough as "typically mild... with most children managing to recover or resist it easily even in the absence of vaccination." Similarly, Douglas Jenkinson conducted a study in 1995 involving 500 instances of natural whooping cough, where he found that parents seldom recognized the distinct cough, leading him to the conclusion that “serious consequences are improbable.”
The majority of whooping cough instances are fairly mild. These cases can be challenging to identify without a strong level of suspicion since healthcare providers are not likely to detect the typical cough, which might be the sole indicator. Parents can be comforted by the fact that severe outcomes are improbable. Adults can also contract whooping cough, frequently catching it from their children, and exhibit symptoms similar to those of kids.
5. The Prevalence of Whooping Cough Bacteria
Estimates suggest that approximately one-third of adults and adolescents suffering from a persistent cough may be infected with B. pertussis. This holds true even for individuals who have received vaccinations or experienced the disease naturally.
It is crucial to highlight that all 13 investigations concerning prolonged cough in adolescents and adults have uncovered signs of B. pertussis infection. These research studies span six nations and cover seven regions in the United States over a 16-year timeframe, indicating that B. pertussis infection is commonplace among adolescents and adults.
Although whooping cough has historically been perceived as a childhood ailment, its presence in adults was well-documented nearly a hundred years ago, and it is now acknowledged as a significant contributor to respiratory illnesses in both adolescents and adults, including older adults. Due to diminishing immunity, pertussis can manifest in adolescents and adults even with a full history of vaccination or prior infection. Research conducted in Canada, Denmark, Germany, France, and the United States reveals that 12 to 32% of adults and adolescents with a cough lasting a week or longer are infected with Bordetella pertussis.
Sadly, the widespread belief that vaccination has effectively eliminated whooping cough often leads to a failure in accurate diagnosis, which skews the reported incidence rates.
The diagnosis of pertussis is often overlooked, primarily due to the misconception that whooping cough is strictly a children's disease, effectively managed through standard childhood vaccinations, along with the false assumption that immunity gained through disease or vaccination is permanent.
6. Neurological Damage Caused by Vaccines
For decades, the issue of potential neurological harm linked to vaccinations has been a contentious topic.
As early as the 1940s, research findings began to propose that vaccines could lead to serious neurological disorders, commonly referred to as vaccine encephalopathy.
A 1948 publication in Pediatrics examined cases of brain injury following vaccination. The article bears a striking resemblance to the surge of autism cases that would emerge in the following decades. The affected children, primarily boys, had shown normal development before vaccination, yet exhibited “acute cerebral” symptoms within hours after receiving the shot. This was followed by a regression or a “halt in further development.”
An analysis of medical records from the Children’s Hospital over the last decade revealed 15 occurrences where children exhibited acute cerebral symptoms shortly after being given the pertussis vaccine. These children, aged between 5 and 18 months, appeared to be developing normally according to parental accounts. Prior to vaccination, none had experienced seizures. Of the affected children, twelve were boys and three were girls, reflecting a gender difference seen with other neurotoxic substances, like lead, known to severely harm developing nervous systems. At the time of vaccination, the ages of the children ranged from 5 to 18 months. Comprehensive developmental assessments were available for all but two children, whose mothers reported normal development. Historical records indicated that many of the children had achieved milestones such as sitting, walking, and talking before being vaccinated; post-vaccination regressions or developmental stagnations were noted in several cases. Based on available information, none of the children appeared to have any pre-existing deficiencies before their acute illnesses.
In 1977, Dr. Gordon Stewart cautioned that the risks associated with the vaccine outweighed the likelihood of contracting whooping cough.
Due to a national shortfall in both epidemiological data and public comprehension, quantifying the prevalence of pertussis reaction syndrome or subsequent brain damage and cognitive impairment is challenging. It is estimated that incidence rates could be no lower than 1 in 60,000, but might reach as high as 1 in 10,000, or potentially even more in its temporary form.
7. Decline of Whooping Cough Vaccine Efficacy Within Three Years
Research led by Dr. David Witt, who heads the infectious disease department at Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in San Rafael, California, has revealed that the effectiveness of the pertussis vaccine diminishes within a mere three years. “The vaccine administered to infants and young children shows a significant reduction in its effectiveness after just three years—much sooner than what was previously believed by healthcare professionals... It was unsettling to recognize that perhaps we had more faith in the vaccine than it warranted,” stated Dr. Witt, the principal investigator. Furthermore, renowned expert in pertussis, Dr. James D. Cherry, also highlighted that findings regarding Tdap indicate no protection after just three years.
In the United States, three separate studies assessed the effectiveness of the Tdap vaccine. The results indicated effectiveness rates of 75.3%, 73.0%, and 68.8% during the first year. However, after three years, there was nearly no evidence supporting the vaccine's effectiveness.
Witt and his team made an alarming discovery: the greatest incidence of the disease was found among children aged 8 to 12 who had completed their vaccination schedule.
Astonishingly, the highest rates of disease were recorded in children aged 8 to 12 who had already been vaccinated... Moreover, in both the 2-7 and 8-12 age brackets, there was no significant difference in disease occurrence between those who were fully vaccinated and those who were either partially vaccinated or unvaccinated.
8. Whooping Cough is Now Affecting Teenagers and Adults
Prior to the introduction of the pertussis vaccine, extended natural immunity was quite common due to familial and community interactions. During the 1940s, pertussis was primarily regarded as a disease affecting only children, and it was surprising if an adolescent or adult contracted it. The accompanying diagram illustrates that clinical cases were largely confined to children, while ongoing familial relationships allowed those with natural immunity to maintain it through regular contact with infected younger family members.
In the period before vaccination, children constituted the bulk of pertussis cases. Adults who had experienced pertussis in their youth benefitted from ongoing boosts to their acquired immunity due to repeated exposures within the community, while mothers provided their infants with immunity through the transfer of antibodies during pregnancy. However, as vaccination became widespread among children, this newly immunized group received protection, leading to a rise in pertussis cases among adolescents and adults who have lost their vaccine-derived immunity, alongside infants who are now receiving fewer passive antibodies than those born before the vaccine era and are also too young for immunization as per the current vaccination guidelines.
Vaccination has significantly altered the previous understanding, as vaccinologists were unaware of the immune pathways that lead to true, lasting herd immunity, differing from the misleading notion of vaccine-induced herd immunity. This lack of knowledge has led us to our current situation, as depicted in the accompanying figure. Instead of being primarily a disease affecting children, pertussis has increasingly occurred in adolescents and adults. More alarmingly, infants who previously benefited from strong maternal antibodies are now at risk. The pertussis vaccination program has fundamentally transformed the epidemiology of pertussis; it has disrupted the natural process by which individuals develop immunity, resulting in vaccinated individuals becoming carriers of pertussis bacteria that evolve into new strains.
This shift began in the 1950s with the administration of the whole cell vaccine, and it intensified when the introduction of the less effective but perceived "safer" acellular vaccine led to prolonged colonization of the airways upon re-exposure to pertussis bacteria.
9. Vaccines Effectively Alter the Immune System's Programming
The phrase “original antigenic sin” (OAS) was first introduced by Dr. Thomas Francis, a prominent figure during the age of the Salk vaccine, recognized for supervising and analyzing the outcomes of the most extensive (and contentious) polio vaccine trial ever conducted. He clarified the concept of OAS by illustrating it with the example of the natural influenza virus.
When an individual encounters an infectious disease for the first time, the immune system activates its innate defenses, which primarily consist of pre-existing antibodies and some forms of cellular immunity. During this encounter, the body prepares for potential future infections. When the same infectious agent is encountered again, the immune system relies on its memory of the previous encounter to produce specific antibodies and replicate cells that identify the invaders and respond more swiftly.
In contrast, once a vaccine is administered, and the actual microorganism appears later, the immune system responds based on the programming established by the vaccination, which is what is referred to as original antigenic sin (OAS). The response triggered by vaccination differs significantly from natural immunity and tends to be less effective. Dr. Cherry later refined the terminology used to describe this phenomenon, rebranding it as “linked epitope suppression,” while still addressing the underlying issue.
A prior study found that children who experienced failures with the DTaP vaccine demonstrated a diminished antibody response to the non-vaccine antigen ACT, while unvaccinated children infected with pertussis exhibited a robust antibody response to the same antigen. This is an example of linked epitope suppression, where the immune reaction to new epitopes is hindered by the strong response elicited by the original vaccine components.
Subsequently, another physician confirmed this information in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
The reduced level of protection afforded by DTaP, whether after the initial vaccination or the complete primary series, could stem from linked epitope suppression. This phenomenon occurs when the first exposure to the vaccine establishes an immune response targeted at specific epitopes, thereby hindering the response to other connected epitopes in later vaccinations.
The DTaP vaccine contains only 3 to 5 antigens, in stark contrast to the over 3,000 found in the DTwP vaccine. This difference leads to a phenomenon known as linked-epitope suppression, also referred to as original antigenic sin. As a result, children who receive the DTaP vaccine are more vulnerable to pertussis for the entirety of their lives, and there is no straightforward solution to mitigate this elevated lifelong risk.
Vaccinologists Advocate for Increased Vaccination Despite Setbacks. At the outset, all vaccines were expected to provide lifelong protection for those who received them, particularly from whooping cough.
Holocaust Deniers. Hero’s or villains.
Ursula Haverbeck (born November 8, 1928, died November 20, 2024) recently passed away at the age of ninety-six. She became well-known, or rather infamous, in Germany for her willingness to question the mainstream narrative of the Jewish Holocaust, which states that six million people perished. Throughout her life, she frequently clashed with German authorities over charges of ‘Holocaust denial’ and ‘incitement to hatred,’ offences that usually lead to heavy fines or incarceration. Her purported crime was her belief that Auschwitz functioned as a labour camp rather than a death camp. In a speech delivered in 2016 in Lichtenrade, a district in southern Berlin, Ursula referred to the Holocaust as one of history’s greatest fabrications, asserting that the gas chambers at Auschwitz were not genuine.
Ursula was one of many holocaust deniers. The numbers and logistics did not allow for it. The number of deaths being six million was a propaganda number produced by the Russian for some reason known only to them is well established. Although, it was suspected as cover for the amount of Jews killed by the communists. That there was never enough cyanide produced to kill all those people. That the railways had been mostly destroyed and there was no way to get them to the camps. Even if there were gas chambers, there were not enough hours in a day to kill that many people. The Jewish worldwide population census showed around 13 million Jews worldwide in 1938. In the next census, there were slightly more than 13 million Jews in 1948. The increase in the population would have increased by around 1.3 million or 1% per year. That would likely have only been 300,000 to die in the camps. Many Jews died in Russia and elsewhere from general fighting. The holocaust did take place, it was still a huge number, just not six million. In fact, the six million was a ridiculous number. This led to people like Ursula saying that no Jews died. This is the sad resulting story.
Her Wikipedia page indicates that in November 2015, when she was 87 years old, she received a ten-month prison sentence for Holocaust denial. Further convictions in late 2016 resulted in additional prison terms. Despite her attempts to appeal these sentences, she was taken into custody by German police on May 7, 2018, to begin serving her latest two-year sentence. After being released from a prison in Bielefeld at the end of 2020, she was again charged, subsequently undergoing a new trial in March 2022, which concluded with a one-year prison sentence. On June 26, 2024, she faced yet another conviction, resulting in an additional 16 months behind bars.
Ursula’s multiple imprisonments uncover a disturbing aspect of our adversaries. They reveal an intense desperation to uphold the Holocaust narrative that has been ingrained in society for the last sixty years, indicating how fundamentally fragile this narrative is if they feel compelled to incarcerate a nonagenarian simply for holding a different view on Auschwitz. Essentially, Ursula's offences were thought crimes; she held views that diverged from the official perspective of the German authorities regarding the historical events from 1939 to 1945, leading to her arrest, fines, sentencing, and imprisonment.
Ursula could have been permitted to harbour her 'heretical' opinions without facing any legal repercussions had she chosen to keep them to herself. However, by openly discussing her 'heresy' and associating with the political dissidents on Germany's 'far right,' she crossed a line. Authoritarian regimes like that of Germany cannot tolerate their citizens questioning or even recognizing Jewish narratives about the events at Auschwitz; such beliefs must be accepted wholeheartedly. Any deviation from this is seen as a threat, prompting the possibility of exploration, alternative viewpoints, or even scepticism regarding the entire Holocaust narrative. As a result, it is deemed necessary to silence any dissenting voices or even the slightest objections, to prevent the collapse of the established narrative.
If Ursula had considered challenging or doubting the occurrence of the Cambodian genocide (1976-1980) committed by the Khmer Rouge, would she have faced fines or imprisonment? Would voicing disbelief in certain aspects of the Holodomor genocide (1932-1933), which resulted in millions of Ukrainian deaths, have led to charges of ‘incitement to hatred’? What consequences might have befallen Ursula for denying the Armenian Genocide perpetrated by the Turks (1915-1923), which saw around a million Armenian's killed? Alternatively, if her views on the Rwandan genocide (1994) differed, where nearly a million Tutsis were murdered, would she have faced arrest or penalties? If she proclaimed that Joseph Stalin’s regime (1929-1953) never resulted in the deaths of approximately 50 million people or denied its connection to the Great Purge targeting political opponents, would authorities have acted against her? And what if Ursula attempted to convince her fellow Germans that Mao Zedong’s regime (1949-1976) was not responsible for the mass extermination of an estimated 40 to 70 million individuals? What are the chances she would be called in by the authorities for such claims?
In reality, Ursula would likely face no ramifications. No German court would prosecute her for holding different beliefs regarding various genocides, or for expressing those views to others. However, the topic of the Holocaust is perceived quite differently; not solely due to its extensive historical accuracy or numerical correctness upon careful scrutiny, but also because of the considerable power, wealth, and influence wielded by Jewish interests across Europe. Any deviation from the established figure of six million deaths in the Holocaust is not tolerated.
They insist on recognizing Auschwitz exclusively as a death camp designed solely for the extermination of Jewish prisoners. Additionally, they exert significant pressure on German officials to prevent any deviation from the established narrative.
I can somewhat relate to their stance, as every marginalized group believes itself to be the ultimate victim of historical injustices. Thus, the Jewish community is acting similarly to other groups who feel they have faced unjust persecution.
However, a crucial distinction exists.
The Jewish community employs legal strategies and criminal charges to uphold their views, thereby compelling non-Jewish individuals to conform, with the threat of potential legal consequences. Currently, 17 European nations, including Canada and Israel, have made denying the Holocaust a criminal offence. In their media, Jews frequently criticize those who challenge the established narrative, striving to depict any dissenters in an unfavourable manner. This tactic is not employed by any other ethnic group globally.
This explains why Jewish people often resist acknowledging the genocidal suffering of other groups as being equivalent to or surpassing their own experiences. This reluctance is one of the reasons behind their determination to penalize any form of Holocaust denial. A similar situation could arise in the U.S. if the First Amendment were to be weakened or completely abolished. Currently, Jewish groups in America are actively pursuing efforts to undermine this amendment, as it obstructs their attempts to criminalize all speech labelled as ‘anti-Semitic.’
What appears to be a significant fear among Jews is the power of language. Abe Foxman, the former national director of the ADL, has pointed out, “The Holocaust didn’t start with gas chambers or Auschwitz. It started with words.” It's understandable, then, why they exert so much effort to regulate the thoughts and expressions of others. They only support free speech when it aligns with their interests; ultimately, their goal is to restrict speech rather than promote true freedom.
Our adversaries claim that prosecuting dissenters of the Holocaust narrative is justified on the grounds that the atrocities carried out by the Nazis were unparalleled in all of history. They argue that it is essential to preserve the historical accuracy of these events, particularly the role of Germany in the deaths of millions of Jews, which should never be overlooked. Consequently, they believe that it is the responsibility of the German government to impose fines or even prison sentences on those who ‘incite hatred’ towards Jews to prevent the recurrence of such events.
By far the worst outcome from the use of the Holocaust as a weapon against those who would speak out. This leaves the Jewish elite, the Khazarian Jews, able to commit heinous crimes against humanity without consequences. These Jews who are not Jews as Revelations warns us about. They are and have always been the high priests of Satan himself. When they start wars in Ukraine, and genocides in Israel. When they destroy society in Europe and turn the Europeans back into surfs. Nobody speaks out and calls them out as villain because of the anti-Semitism label.
Such reasoning is fundamentally flawed from the beginning. When discussing genocides or the number of human lives lost, the Holocaust does not stand as an unparalleled event in history.
Moreover, has prohibiting speech and freedom of inquiry ever promoted the advancement of truth? If the narrative surrounding the Holocaust holds factual accuracy, why is there a need to enforce it through legal penalties and punishments for those who express differing thoughts? Why can't its supporters engage in a debate within the realm of ideas and open inquiry, rather than frequently resorting to threats of legal action and substantial fines? Does the behaviour of Jews in this context reflect a commitment to truth, or does it indicate a willingness to uphold falsehoods to the extent of imprisoning a 96-year-old woman simply for holding an opposing viewpoint?
Ursula Haverbeck exemplified courage by standing firm in her beliefs, willing to face the consequences. I hope that more individuals of her background will display the same unwavering conviction. This wonderful old lady stood up and fought for freedom when so many have hidden under their beds and waited for their turn to die.
The Bricks Summit PT 3
How is the Collective West reacting to the rise of a new global majority that aligns with the approaches and ideas proposed by leaders from Russia, India, and China? What elements have led to the significant surge in the popularity of BRICS? Furthermore, to what extent is the media's coverage of events related to BRICS? What implications arise from the nations that have been added as partners?
The BRICS Summit conveyed a narrative that counters the Western view of Vladimir Putin’s supposed isolation. For the first time in many years, numerous Western media outlets recognized this constructively, suggesting that Putin is, in fact, not isolated. Media organizations such as CNN, France24, BBC, Politico, Reuters, The Guardian, Bloomberg, Foreign Affairs, and Zeit Online shared this viewpoint. In contrast, Western governments chose to remain notably silent, with some sceptics noticing that following the Summit's conclusion, Israel's attack on Iran was timed to redirect attention from the event's considerable success. The unity was stunning to watch. That nations can get on well together.
There are now 13 new countries being added to the collective.
New Countries
Population. GDP (ppp)
Indonesia 282mil 4.7tril
Malaysia 35 1.3
Thailand 65 1.6
Vietnam 100 1.6
Kazakhstan 20 .7
Uzbekistan 38 .5
Turkey 88 3.5
Belarus 10 .3
Algeria 47 .8
Uganda 51 .2
Nigeria 235 1.5
Cuba 13 .2
Bolivia 10 .2
Total 994mil 17.1tril
Existing Countries
China 1400 35tril
India 1400 15
Russia 160 8.2
Brazil 234 4.7
South Africa 64 1.1
Egypt 116 1.9
Ethiopia 132 .5
Iran 91 1.9
UAE 11 .8
Saudi Arabia 34 2.4
Total 3642 71.5
Gross total 4636 88.6
This compared to the G7 plus Australia plus some extras.
USA 334 25(15)
Japan 124 6.7
Germany 84 5.7
France 67 4
UK 69 4
Italy 59 3.4
South Korea 52 3
Canada 40 2.5
Australia 26 1.8
Spain 48 2.5
Poland 38 1.8
Taiwan 23 1.8
Netherlands 18 1.3
Belgium 12 .8
Total 994 60(50)
Examining the data from the United States might cause you to question its reliability. In the last ten years, the American economy has undergone a notable decline, aligning its performance with that of India. A more accurate representation of the GDP could be around 15 trillion, indicating that the economic scale of the USA closely resembles that of India, which boasts one of the fastest-growing economies in the world. Each year, by printing money, the USA injects four trillion dollars into its economy, strategically managing the funds to present an inflated numerical strength that fosters confidence in the dollar. This economic downturn is not solely an American issue; countries like Japan, the UK, France, and Germany are also experiencing significant declines, all facing financial crisis. These nations have resorted to financialising their economies, leading to inflated economic indicators.
The combined population of BRICS countries is 4.5 times greater than that of Western nations. Their economies are advancing, with real GDP measures being almost double those of the West. Together, they account for three out of the four largest economies and five of the eight biggest by population. Moreover, they represent over half of the global population, with several countries eager to join. Currently, there are seven nations that have populations exceeding 200 million, with five of them included in BRICS, and Pakistan is expected to join next year.
The viability of the Western banking system hinges on the unwillingness of Western countries to dismantle it. BRICS nations understand that a collapse would negatively affect all parties involved and therefore prefer to maintain the system until it can no longer be salvaged. It is paradoxical that, while the USA and the EU actively oppose Russia, China, and India, these very nations are the ones keeping the current system afloat.
Individuals are retaining US dollars as part of their assets. However, these people are astute and will be vigilant regarding any changes in the landscape. Even a minor incident could trigger a widespread shift away from the dollar, resulting in a swift departure.
Where does the world proceed from here? The only factor preventing the total defeat of the West is the financial system. Global banks are compelled to operate within this system, and as a result, countries feel ensnared. This notion is misguided, as illustrated by Iran's experience when the USA attempted to isolate it with numerous sanctions. Upon the West's return, they discovered that life had continued; Iran had managed to grow and expand regardless.
The prophecies were right about the 24 of October. On that day, the world as we know it changed.
Outcomes of the BRICS summit: progressing toward a multipolar global landscape.
The XVI BRICS Summit has concluded in Kazan. What transformations are occurring in the global order, and how might cooperation among the group evolve going forward? The rise of the Global South. That is not countries south of the equator but countries south of Europe.
Russia
During the summit, President Vladimir Putin of Russia emphasized that BRICS comprises nations that share similar values—sovereign states from various continents, each with distinct development models, faiths, civilizations, and cultural identities. He noted that these nations promote “equality, good-neighbourliness, and mutual respect, along with the noble principles of friendship and harmony, as well as universal prosperity and well-being.” Furthermore, he asserted that these countries demonstrate a commitment to the world's future not just rhetorically, but through actionable efforts that significantly address pressing regional challenges. The Russian leader emphasized that given the swift growth of BRICS economies, it is essential to enhance collaboration in fields like technology, education, efficient resource development, trade, logistics, finance, and insurance. Initiatives such as the new BRICS investment platform, the initiation of consultations with the WTO, collaboration in carbon markets, and the climate research platform could serve as mechanisms to broaden cooperation. Moreover, Russia has suggested improvements to the mechanisms for sharing information regarding online dispute resolution practices in electronic commerce. This includes the establishment of an arbitration investment centre and a BRICS tax secretariat, as well as the formulation of a convention for resolving investment disputes. The proposal also encompasses creating direct connections between special economic zones, launching a BRICS grain exchange, and enhancing collaboration in subsurface resource utilization. Looking ahead, Vladimir Putin deemed it prudent to establish a BRICS 'reinsurance pool,' along with platforms dedicated to precious metals, diamonds, fair competition, logistics, and transportation.
Beyond economic initiatives, Russia has also introduced various socio-humanitarian projects: the formation of a BRICS research network focused on public health, the establishment of a BRICS alliance in artificial intelligence, and the creation of an interstate program aimed at executing sports initiatives.
Brazil
Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, the President of Brazil, urged the members of BRICS to “join forces in the alliance against hunger and poverty,” emphasizing the inequality present when developed nations prosper at the cost of developing ones. He stated that BRICS “challenges this paradigm.” Da Silva expressed strong appreciation for the efforts of the BRICS New Development Bank (NDB), noting that “this institution plays a crucial role in establishing the infrastructure necessary for our development… It was established as an alternative to those banks that failed to fulfill their commitments.”
He emphasized the importance for BRICS to “develop a financial system aimed at lowering the costs of trade exchanges among our nations.” Brazil intends to prioritize this matter during its presidency next year, alongside addressing climate change: “It is clear that developed nations bear historical responsibility for the current global suffering. They made commitments to lower emissions but did not fulfill them. Our planet is singular, and its future depends on us.”
Egypt
At the summit, President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi of Egypt emphasized the importance his nation places on "bolstering the multipolar system" and "securing financing for developmental objectives in emerging economies through the establishment of trustworthy mechanisms." In this context, Egypt acknowledges the NDB's endeavours to "promote development initiatives, particularly in areas such as transportation, clean energy, infrastructure, the digital sector, and urban development."
Sisi assured that Egypt is prepared to "enhance collaboration with member countries on global platforms and engage in discussions regarding climate change, food security, digitization, education, and scientific advancement." Furthermore, Egypt is keen on implementing national currencies for trade, fostering cooperation with the BRICS Business Council, and reinforcing connections through the group's interbank collaboration framework.
India
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed his support for initiatives that promote enhanced financial integration among BRICS nations. He highlighted that transactions in national currencies and cross-border payments will strengthen collaboration. Modi also shared India's successful implementation of a unified payment interface in its bilateral dealings with the UAE as a model for his fellow leaders.
The Prime Minister viewed the New Development Bank (NDB) as a vital opportunity to address the development challenges faced by the Global South. He emphasized the need to ensure long-term financial stability and broaden market access through the bank's expansion. Furthermore, he underscored the significance of prioritizing the interests of small and medium-sized enterprises for effective multilateral cooperation.
Looking ahead, India aims to establish a digital platform dedicated to the planning and execution of infrastructure projects among the group. Additionally, it expressed its willingness to share expertise in healthcare digitalization and encouraged BRICS nations to participate in its initiatives related to the UN Climate Change Conference.
Iran
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian emphasized that the primary objective of Iran within BRICS is the aspiration for “a new world order that is more equitable and secure.” He noted that “the era of unilateralism, where prosperity and progress were achievable only through the framework established by the West, is nearing its conclusion.” In this context, he remarked, “the emergence and growth of BRICS presents a chance for the global community to not solely align its future with the interests of Western powers…This coalition has effectively established itself as an alternative pathway.”
Following its expansion, BRICS, as stated by the Iranian leader, “encompasses a substantial segment of developing nations and emerging markets.” Iran’s primary hopes revolve around diminishing the dominance of the dollar in the international economy and establishing a “BRICS currency basket or a new mechanism for non-dollar transactions,” enabling nations to refrain from “bearing the costs of misguided financial policies imposed by the United States and the corrupt practices within their financial systems.”
M. Pezeshkian believes that BRICS has the potential to “amplify the unheard voices of the global community.” He asserted, “We embrace the BRICS vision of overhauling global governance, fostering peace, security, and inclusive economic development, enhancing transparency, and reinforcing democracy within global financial institutions…to cultivate alternative avenues for growth and prosperity in the countries of the Global South.”
China
Xi Jinping, the President of China, emphasized the need to "advance the BRICS peace agenda to safeguard common security," particularly now as "the world enters a phase of upheaval and change." Furthermore, he urged for the "enhancement of the BRICS innovation agenda," which includes strengthening collaboration in artificial intelligence, jointly investigating deep-sea resources, facilitating interactions between special economic zones, and establishing a "BRICS cooperation network for digital ecosystems."
China emphasizes the importance of a green agenda as well, stating, "All BRICS nations should actively align with the global trend towards green and low-carbon transformations," by increasing partnerships in the green sector, renewable energy, and sustainable development of mineral resources. Even though China admits that much of the climate change movement is nothing more than Globalists seeking to strip nations of their sovereignty. They have such a vast population, they have to strive to remove as much pollution as possible if their nation is to survive.
On a global scale, BRICS is tasked with "advancing a fair agenda aimed at reforming the global governance system," as the current pace of reforms "does not match the rapid shifts in the balance of international power." The bloc is poised to ensure "representation and voting rights for the Global South," and can play a key role in overhauling the international financial system, thereby boosting the influence of the New Development Bank (NDB). Lastly, in the realm of humanitarian efforts, China aims to "promote the cultural and humanitarian agenda of BRICS" alongside fostering cooperation in the advancement of digital education.
UAE
The President of the UAE, Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, asserts that collaboration within BRICS is essential "not merely to address present challenges, but also to establish a blueprint for a sustainable future economy." For the UAE, attributes such as flexibility, openness, and innovation are vital in this cooperative effort. Al Nahyan emphasized, “We back initiatives on the global stage aimed at creating platforms that encourage discussions regarding the green economy, sustainable development, and investment.” The UAE is turning into a trading centre for all kinds of commodities. Grain, oil, gold, and silver. While commodities trading through the Comex and the LMBA are falling quickly, trading through the UAE and the Shanghai Exchange are increasing dramatically. New Delhi and Moscow have growing exchanges as will
Another key focus for the UAE in BRICS is “expanding into new markets.” The nation seeks not only to attract foreign investments, but also to wisely invest its domestic capital.
Ethiopia
Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed expressed that BRICS "offers hope for achieving multilateralism within the global structure and addressing the challenges currently confronting the world... while working collaboratively for the benefit of developing nations based on equality". He pointed out that "economic advancements in developing countries have often faced obstacles from an inequitable global financial system." BRICS has the potential to rectify this issue, as its "collective voice encompasses half of the world's population and a third of its GDP," enabling it to "serve as a transformative agent towards establishing a more equitable global order."
Furthermore, for Ethiopia, BRICS serves as a "model of collaboration and unity" in tackling worldwide issues. Abiy Ahmed endorsed his peers' suggestions concerning the enhancement of high-tech cooperation, industrial connections, energy partnerships, and tourism, while also highlighting the significance of "alternative funding for infrastructure projects" offered by the New Development Bank. Additionally, Ethiopia hopes to gain BRICS backing in ensuring adequate representation for Africa in the UN Security Council: “This is not merely about representation; it’s about justice and equality. Consequently, every country will be enabled to participate in global governance.”
South Africa
Cyril Ramaphosa, the President of South Africa, referred to the BRICS history as one characterized by solidarity, mutual respect, and shared benefits. He emphasized that BRICS consists of a diverse group of nations aimed at altering the future of the Global South. To accomplish this, it is essential to harness the full potential of their economic collaboration, promote sustainable development for everyone—not merely for certain nation groups—and take significant actions to foster shared prosperity that is equitable for all.
With regard to economic collaboration, the South African leader highlighted the desire to utilize national currencies for trade. He also pointed out the necessity of addressing climate change issues, which pose significant challenges for developing nations, when discussing sustainable development. Furthermore, he noted the importance of “addressing the challenges faced by small and medium-sized enterprises within BRICS” and “initiating joint programs focused on export development, industrial collaboration, and technology sharing.” In this context, Ramaphosa advocated for reforming the WTO and enhancing “BRICS cooperation in the mineral resources sector.” He views the New Development Bank (NDB) as pivotal for the partnership: “The bank is essential for fulfilling the common aspirations and objectives of developing economies collectively.” Looking ahead, he envisions BRICS evolving into “a powerful instrument for promoting global peace and progress across all sectors of the economy and other areas of life.”
The presidency of BRICS under Russia sought to enhance the group's global standing and to foster collaboration across key areas while also integrating new members into the association's activities. It can be asserted confidently that these objectives have been achieved. As highlighted by Vladimir Putin, “the new members recognized that it is feasible to collaborate and attain results within BRICS. They realized that the foundational principle of our association is mutual respect, along with a necessary consideration of each other's interests.”
Regarding the attitudes of the member states, the Kazan summit underscored their shared expectations, perspectives, and objectives. This is particularly significant considering the group's expansion this year. Other nations that have attained partner state status are likely to emulate the newly admitted members. Just as a large family operates, the international order necessitates not only mutual comprehension but also ongoing collaboration. A new phase of this effort within BRICS has already commenced. Now there are 14 new countries, taking the total to twenty-four.
Kazan Russia just hosts BRICS Summit: A Critical Moment for Global Politics and the Economy
A new era is emerging in the world, marking the gradual decline of the U.S.'s exclusive dominance and its currency, the Dollar.
We are currently experiencing monumental times. One significant issue is the tragic genocide in Gaza, which will be remembered as one of the darkest chapters in human history during the 21st century. This atrocity is alarmingly backed by numerous countries that proclaim to be democratic and to advocate for human rights, including the United States and Germany. Additionally, we are witnessing the emergence of a new era, marked by the gradual decline of U.S. dominance and the hegemony of the American dollar. The mass printing of dollars to cover wars and fire the genocide that is taking place in Gaza. How the dollar and the dollar system is being used as a weapon. This worked against smaller countries, but when they did that to Russia a fatal mistake was made. This dominance, which took shape after World War II, has become rigid in a drastically transformed global landscape in the 21st century.
In this two-part article, I will investigate how this transformative moment is unfolding, with a focus on the contentious role of the BRICS Summit that took place in Kazan from October 22-24, 2024. The first segment will delve into the new payment systems and their anticipated mechanisms.
The Decline of U.S. Hegemony
The BRICS monetary and payment frameworks represent a significant stride towards diminishing U.S. dominance over the dollar-based system. Not that it was introduced at this summit. The development of this new system has been years in the making. China, Russia, Iran, and India have been running tests to get a working model. They have finally come up with a working model. This has already been used between Russia and Iran. The formal introduction of the system took place at a meeting of the Finance Ministers several months ago. At Kazan they reiterated the system and said it is ready for use. The twenty-three countries will now slowly start using it. Slow and steady is the catch cry.
Following World War II, the United States built a global system reflective of its interests, creating institutions that eventually catered to both contemporary needs and its own agendas.
The various crises spawned by its financial systems, along with numerous wars and invasions of sovereign states, and the unilateral sanctions that caused immense suffering and loss of life in nations like Cuba, Iran, Syria, and Afghanistan, have served as a crucial wake-up call for the global community, particularly for the Global South. Furthermore, the manipulation of the world trade system through the U.S. dollar, which was enforced as the exclusive currency for oil transactions, exemplifies the extent of this imposition.
Under the guidance of China and Russia, the BRICS has embodied the aspirations of the Global South for freedom and affluence, instilling a sense of urgency for the establishment of a new world order. This is starting to look like a reality for them rather than a pipe dream. They have a working system in their hands.
What did the Kazan Summit Achieve?
The Kazan Summit is set on the establishment of an integrated payment system for the BRICS, which other nations outside the group may also have the opportunity to use, as noted by French economist Jacques Sapir. They announced that they are now in the stage of developing all the institutions that will stabilise the system. Organisations that rival the IMF to new commodity trading centres that rival and remove the totally corrupt Comex and LMBA. The west will no longer be able to steal the resources of the poorer countries.
The core challenge was in the creation of this internal payment system that has garnered much attention within BRICS discussions. It has been clarified that this will not function as a currency, but as a payment mechanism announced by Vladimir Putin during the economic summit. Russian Finance Minister Mr. Siluanov has provided further elaboration on this topic in various statements.
The objective of BRICS was to develop a payment framework that does not incorporate the dollar or the Euro. Essentially, they aim to facilitate transactions independently of these currencies. However, without causing them to collapse. This may be impossible for the USD as so many trillions are held outside the US. Officially 13 trillion, but in reality, likely twice that. At some point when it becomes obvious and probably well before that, there is going to be a mad dash for the door to get rid of dollars.
The Mechanics of the New Payment System
In the context of international trade, a unit of account specifies the sum to be paid, a transaction unit denotes the currency used for the exchange, and a settlement currency establishes the payment medium for the seller and the obligation for the buyer.
Currently, there seems to be a consensus that the settlement currencies will be the domestic currencies of the participating nations. Nonetheless, since these currencies can change in value relative to each other, it is crucial to establish a unit of account as well as a settlement unit, highlighting an area of concern. This will likely eventually be solved being the same, a brick unit. The Australian dollar will be 90% of a Brick Unit and the New Zealand dollar will be 85% of a Brick Unit. The country still gets to call their currency by whatever name they wish. The real value will be a Brick Unit, a cryptocurrency. There will need to be strong restrictions on how much money a government can print out of thin air.
Approximately a year ago, a proposal emerged to implement a system akin to the Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) managed by the International Monetary Fund. However, Russia and China have expressed that the existing SDR framework includes the dollar and the euro—currencies they prefer to sidestep. This has led to a shift toward developing an electronic unit of account.
This situation exemplifies how cryptocurrency technology can influence political systems. A type of cryptocurrency will be utilized, but it will be linked to a tangible asset, likely gold. According to Sapir, though, the cryptocurrency's value in gold may vary; thus, it does not represent a gold standard system. It does limit the amount of money that can be printed out of thin air.
Countries will engage in an exchange of this cryptocurrency for their national currencies: selling nations will receive a specified amount of cryptocurrency, while buying nations will have to provide a designated sum in return. Consequently, national currencies will be necessary for purchasing cryptocurrency or converting it back to conventional currency.
Implementing this framework will necessitate various technical solutions. Reports indicate that Russia is inclined to have transactions or conversions from cryptocurrency to national currencies occur on a semi-annual basis or at year-end. Transactions in this arrangement would remain in cryptocurrency for a six-month or year-long duration until settlements are finalized. This allows for a scenario where one nation purchases BRICS goods from another while trading with a third party. The objective of this structure is to minimize frequent transactions, facilitating a single final transaction upon settlement. This whole argument seem flawed. If these transactions are happening electronially then there should be no reason for all this to happen instantly.
My Conclusions
China, India and Russia are the biggest, third and fourth-biggest economies in the world. The numbers for the USA GDP are clearly nonsense. They are in a depression with no hope of exit, as is Europe. While India and China are both growing fast. In all the Bric’s countries, you are seeing good growth.To stand in the way of their progress to becoming the world's two superpowers will get that country run over.
In the coming 30 days, observers will have the opportunity to witness a "Blood Moon" eclipse, the "Comet of the Century," and a "Ring of Fire" eclipse.
Over the next 30 days, the night sky will feature three remarkable astronomical events. This week, a lunar eclipse referred to as a “blood moon” is set to occur, followed later this month by the arrival of the “comet of the century,” and on October 2nd, a solar eclipse described as a “ring of fire” will take place. It’s quite extraordinary for such significant celestial occurrences to align so closely in time. Additionally, these astronomical signs emerge as our world faces profound turmoil.
On Tuesday evening, an exceptional event will unfold. It’s a rare occasion to experience a partial lunar eclipse coinciding with a “supermoon.” Make sure to look up on Tuesday for an extraordinary full moon experience.
The harvest moon, marking the closest full moon to the autumnal equinox, will manifest as a supermoon, appearing both larger and more luminous. As if that weren't enough, a partial lunar eclipse will also occur.
This full moon and the lunar eclipse are set for Tuesday night, September 17, extending into Wednesday morning. Reports indicate that during this partial eclipse, the moon will adopt a striking “blood-red” hue.
For stargazers, the moon will be 14 percent larger than usual, casting a haunting autumnal glow. The red colour, known as a blood moon, is typically visible during partial or total lunar eclipses. This dual phenomenon will be observable across Europe, South America, Africa, and much of North America.
The blood-red moon will be visible to a large portion of the western world. Following that, a magnificent comet, referred to by astronomers as “the comet of the century,” will make an appearance in the night sky, starting in late September. Known as C/2023 A3, or Tsuchinshan–ATLAS, this comet is expected to dazzle observers during September and October 2024. Astronomers anticipate that it will be extraordinarily bright, akin to Halley’s comet in 1986 or NEOWISE in 2020. Remarkably, it is expected to be visible without the need for a telescope. Reports indicate that this comet will reach its peak brightness on October 2nd.
C/2023 A3 will be observable in the Northern Hemisphere from September 27 until the final week of October, coinciding with its closest approach to the sun before it embarks on its journey back out of the solar system. According to Cometography, a specialized blog, October 2 will mark the day when C/2023 A3 will shine the brightest, and its tail will be both long and stunning due to its proximity to the sun.
Now, this is starting to feel quite strange. Do you recall what else is set to happen on October 2nd? For those who might not remember, there will be a "ring of fire" Rosh Hashanah eclipse that day. This annular solar eclipse, referred to as the “ring of fire,” is merely a month away. While Hawaii will be the only U.S. state to experience a partial view, the whole eclipse will be visible in parts of Chile and Argentina, with several other South American nations seeing either partial or full effects.
So, to clarify, a “ring of fire” solar eclipse will coincide exactly with the day when “the comet of the century” reaches its brightest. All of this will unfold just as the Rosh Hashanah festival begins. As I mentioned in an earlier article, there will only be two solar eclipses in 2024, both occurring on significant dates.
What is the reason that solar eclipses often coincide with significant dates? In 2024, there will only be two solar eclipses in total. The first one occurred on April 8th and is referred to as the “Great American Eclipse of 2024,” happening just after sunset in Israel, coinciding with the start of the first day of the first month in the Hebrew calendar. The second eclipse is scheduled for October 2nd, when it will also be shortly after sunset in Israel, marking the beginning of the Rosh Hashanah festival.
Recently, numerous remarkable eclipses have taken place, yet a large portion of the population remains oblivious to them. Additionally, many individuals seem unaware of the growing instability of our planet.
On Monday, southern California experienced yet another significant earthquake. According to the United States Geological Survey, a magnitude 3.6 quake was recorded early Monday, making it the second tremor in the area in less than five days. This earthquake occurred to the west of Los Angeles, with its epicentre located approximately 3.5 miles north of Malibu, as reported by the USGS.
Moreover, along the northern North American coast, a magnitude 6.5 earthquake was reported. The United States Geological Survey stated that this tremor struck off the shores of Port McNeill, a coastal town in British Columbia, Canada, on Sunday.
According to the USGS, the earthquake's epicentre was located in the Pacific Ocean, approximately 10 km (6.2 miles) beneath the ocean floor.
Why is it that more people don’t seem to grasp what’s unfolding?
As I mentioned a few days ago, seismic activity in California is truly setting records, yet very few individuals appear to be worried.
While those in the Southern Hemisphere may feel sorry for those in the Northern Hemisphere, I will bring your attention to the incredible number of earthquakes that have been shaking an area from the south Island of New Zealand all the way up to Fiji. With the North Island of New Zealand having 100 quakes a day. This has been happening for months.
With the prophecies of a great volcanic eruption striking New Zealand getting ever closer.
If King Charles is the Antichrist, then who is the False Prophet and the Woman riding the beast of Revelation 17.
Who is the False Prophet?
The False Prophet does not get much of a mention in the Bible. Daniel and Matthew do not mention him at all. He does use his power to send out demonic spirits to all nations and gather them together for Armageddon. He is most likely one of the two horns that are on the Beast from the Earth from Rev 13. Furthermore, he is the person dealing with heads of nations to get them to take their countries to war. The False Prophet will be a leader in politics, and otherwise he could not get countries to go to war. He is one of the three that gets thrown into the lake of fire. A truly evil character.
In Revelations 19, who does what is made a little clearer as far as the False Prophet goes.
Rev 19 20 “And the beast was captured, and with it the false prophet who in its presence had done the signs by which he deceived those who had received the mark of the beast”
This is the face of the beast from the earth that we will see. Many Christians will declare that he is the Antichrist, but they will be wrong. He is just the frontman. He does not have to be German or one of the royals. In fact, it is highly unlikely that he is one of the royals. Furthermore, he has to have a close relationship with the Antichrist.
In Daniel, the situation is described as a horn rising and three falling before it. In Revelations, it is described as a new beast rising and it has two horns. The Antichrist is the one who forces everyone to get the mark, and the False Prophet is the one who deceives those who receive the mark. One is the power behind the scenes, the other a person who is seen by everyone.
The Antichrist being British, it is not possible for the False Prophet to be European. To clear that up, we will have a brief look at the beast of Rev 13 and the fourth beast of Daniel 7. The picture of the Beast of Rev 13 shows that it is made up of the first three beasts of Daniel 7. That is the UK(lion), Russia(bear) and Europe(leopard). Russia is out, so that leaves the UK or Europe. The relationship with Europe is not close enough. Europe is too divided as nations for this close connection. The False Prophet will need to be British as will. Rev 19 says ‘false prophet who in its (Antichrist) presence had done the signs ‘ So very close relationship. Currently, things are looking awful in the UK. Look for a sudden change and things to start to go very well.
We have just seen the election of a man called Keir Starmer. As we will see a truly evil character.
The Jimmy Savile affair. This is the story of a high-profile paedophile whose long series of crimes was covered up by the British legal system. There had been many complaints about his sexual abuse of children, yet there were no prosecutions. Savile famous for his close relationship with Prince Charles, remained free. Because there were so many complaints, the cover-up could only have come from the very top of the Crown Prosecution Service. The person at the top was Keir Starmer, it had to be him.
The Julian Assange affair. Originally, Assange was falsely accused of rape by some Swedish women. Knowing this was just a set-up, he took refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy. Eventually, the Swedish took back their accusations and Assange should have been let free. This was ignored, and his political persecution was carried on with no just cause. This was done by Keir Starmer.
The policies of the new labour government are evil and Draconian. Open persecution of Christians is plain for all to see. This is the rise of a stunningly evil person.
With his close ties to King Charles through the Savile affair, the title of the False Prophet is sitting squarely on this character's shoulders.
Keir Starmer, the False Prophet.
Who is the woman riding the beast.
Who is the woman that rides the beast? I am going to try and show you that this woman is a particular person. This woman is a person and also a representative of wickedness. Called the woman, the great Harlot.
Fallen fallen is Babylon the Great. That is the name of the whole picture. A system of control. It is run by Abaddon from the bottomless pit. Not just the beast, the kings, the horns or the woman. In fact, the horns despise the women. Whether it is them that eventually attack her is another story. No financial collapse, no fire yet, just fallen. When will it fall? What is fallen, what has fallen? First, we get fallen fallen, Then, her plagues will come in a single day, and then we get destroyed by fire in an hour. Who has fallen, the USA? The Ace in the hand for the US has been having the world reserve currency. It meant that no matter how incompetent the management, they could just print more money. The USA was officially made the world's reserve currency when the IMF was set up in 1946. In December 1946 USA became the seventh head. It was to last for a short time, and the shortest time is one generation. That would have been 70 years, or until 2016. However, a reprieve was given for four years when Donald Trump won the 2016 election. There was massive cheating taking place to steal the country, but they were surprised by the overwhelming vote for Trump. They weren’t going to make that mistake again. The USA is a constitutional Republic. By using election fraud that has been taken away. Through this fraud, the Republic has fallen and has lost sovereignty to non-constitutional international criminals. The wicked men who have stolen the USA from its people by using deception are being exposed to the rest of the world. As a result, the world is turning away from the manipulations that have been caused by the USA. The USA was defeated and the country stolen with Trumps defeat in November 2020. November 2020 is 400 years from the Mayflower setting up the first colony, almost to the day. In 2015, Russia entered Syria in confrontation with the USA and the USA backed down. A military defeat. In 2015, China surpassed the USA GDP in manufacturing, a financial defeat.
The streets of the cities were to become the home of every foul and unclean spirit, and as we watch the collapse of the USA it is certainly true. Every foul and vile sin is being promoted as good, and good is being pushed as evil. There is nothing left now but their destruction.
Revelations 18-2
She has become a dwelling place for demons,
a haunt for every unclean spirit,
a haunt for every unclean bird,
a haunt for every unclean and detestable beast.
For all nations have drunk
the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality,
There is hardly a country where Joe Biden and Kamala Harris go where they are not mocked. Fallen fallen has taken place, and we have seen the streets of the cities become the home of every foul creature. Next there is a call by a voice from heaven for the saints to come out of her. Or come out of the Great Cities. The voice calls for his people to come out of her, least you take part in her sins and punishment. We are talking about the great cities, not all the US. This may include the USA proxy controlled countries. They are Japan, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. This is a call for the saints to be vigilant because of what is about to happen. There was, recently, a major headline on Brighteon TV saying ’ Get out of the cities’.
When I read the statement from Revelations 18 that says;
As she glorified herself and lived in luxury,
so give her a like measure of torment and mourning,
since in her heart she says,
‘I sit as a queen,
I am no widow,
and mourning I shall never see.’
For this reason, her plagues will come in a single day,
death and mourning and famine,
I could not help thinking that was said by a person. In Isaiah 49, which also covers this, it gives more details and confirmed my thoughts. This is the woman speaking who rides the beast. This is not only a symbol, but a particular person. Then I came across a prophecy by William Barnham. Wiiliam Barnham was an American Christian minister who initiated the post-WW11 spiritual revival, and was a prophet with the anointing of Elijah who had come to prelude Christ's return.
“And I saw a WOMAN, lying, vulgar as she was, and she dominated the country. And I predict that a WOMAN will either be President, or come into great power of some sort in the United States before the total annihilation of the world. Keep that in mind, and I have said it. I saw a WOMAN stand in the United States like a great queen or something (Rev. 18:7). A great WOMAN will rise up in the United States, well-dressed and beautiful, but cruel in heart. She will either guide or lead this nation to ruination.”
Watch for this. She certainly is beautiful and well-dressed. She is already infamous for her cruel heart. A woman dressed in purple.
This woman does not have to be President, but just the effective leader of the country.
Kamala Harris has now, for all intents and purposes, taken over from Biden. Nearly all dealing with heads of states are now completed by Harris. Her history is littered with acts of cruel and dishonest behaviour. The main reason she is so unpopular. If you look at Harris's images on Google, you find she is nearly always dressed in purples, blues or mauve's. She certainly fits the profile like a hand in a glove. When Kamala appeared on the scene, I looked at her picture on Google. Every picture on the first page had her dressed in purple or shades of purple. Three and a half years ago I was pointing to her as the woman.
Kamala Harris the woman who rides the beast.
The inaugural modern Olympics took place in Athens in 1896. It was a modest event featuring some unusual sports. The true Olympic Games, however, were hosted in Paris in 1900.
With the end of times seemingly approaching, one wonders if these will be the final games. The last Pope, number 111, has arrived. Charles the Great (Charlemagne), was the first king of Europe, and now Charles the Third, the last reigning king in Europe.
The conclusion of the games revealed an event marked by oddities. Prior to the commencement, Russia faced a ban seemingly without justification, rooted more in political motives than any real infractions. They were accused of doping, despite their medal tally being commensurate with their population size, which would suggest they are among the least likely to cheat with drugs.
The opening ceremony set a controversial tone, offending Christians and anyone with spiritual beliefs. A particularly shocking portrayal of the Last Supper by a group of drag performers was undeniably unsettling. Additionally, they enlisted a heavy metal band with satanic themes during the proceedings. One striking image involved a woman with her head resting in her arms. This grand event, intended to unify people, instead featured an appalling affront to a quarter of the global population. No wonder when Macron made his opening speech the crowd loudly booed him.
The issue of male boxers participating in women's boxing sparked further debate, as these men physically overpowered their female competitors. A notable revelation was that one of these male boxers hailed from Algeria, a predominantly Muslim nation. You would have thought this would never have happened. This raises questions about whether men can physically assault women simply by donning skirts. This is not a matter of opinion, as both boxers had previously faced disqualification for being male.
Then there was the Australian break Dance who did not know what Break Dancing was. Truly bazaar.
In another instance, the USA accused Chinese swimmers of doping. In response, the Chinese highlighted that the US testing board had previously allowed several athletes who tested positive for drugs to compete unpunished. Ultimately, it turns out that the USA itself was implicated in the doping scandal.
Determining individual instances of cheating can be challenging, but it is easier to identify nations that ignore the issue altogether, as evidenced by their disproportionate success in winning medals. Countries such as New Zealand and Australia provide excellent support for young athletes, which can offer them a slight competitive edge. Occasionally, a nation may excel in less popular sports, although this occurrence is becoming rarer.
So, which nations stand out for having a high number of doping violations? France, as the host nation, is likely to secure more medals than average. Smaller countries, with populations under ten million, can achieve skewed medal counts with just a handful of victories.
The USA is already well-known for this.
Australia: 54 medals at a rate of 2.16 per million
New Zealand: 20 medals at 4.0
United Kingdom: 65 medals at 1.12
Canada and Italy exhibit expected figures, with a medal count per million of .65.
The issue of doping seems rampant among English-speaking Commonwealth nations. Conversely, it is encouraging to note that drug use in the Caribbean has significantly decreased. With female athletes, tell-tale signs of doping include unnatural muscle development, particularly in the neck area. While this is not definitive proof of cheating, it is a common indicator. For example, some female sprinters from the USA and a New Zealand canoeist raise suspicions.
In the past, during the Soviet Union era, the signs of illicit drug use were overt. Observers could easily identify athletes who were likely using performance enhancers. The sophistication of the substances available has only increased since then.
These Olympics may very well be referred to as the “empty Olympics” due to the surprisingly low turnout of spectators. The haunting image of a high jumper on the field while the stands remained sparsely filled was striking. In contrast, during the London Games, securing a ticket was nearly impossible, with every venue brimming with fans.
The closing ceremony ended with a display that many considered to be dark in nature. A figure resembling a dark angel or even Satan hovered over indistinct figures. Russia's foreign ministry criticized a key element of the Paris Olympics closing ceremony, labelling it as “obvious Satanism.” Maria Zakharova expressed her views on her Telegram channel, referring to the “Golden Voyager” segment, which was meant to symbolize the gold-coated vinyl record launched aboard the Voyager spacecraft in 1977. However, Zakharova did not share that sentiment. She stated, “The only thing worse than the opening of the Olympic Games in Paris could be their closing. France did not miss this chance.”
‘Everything is in plain text: a fallen angel turns people into zombies, subjugates humanity to his will, which has less and less time left.
Why is King Charles the Antichrist?
How can this be? When the Antichrist of the movies is this diabolical evil genius and King Charles is this foolish old, out of touch duffer.
Well, let us see how. We will look at Charles heritage and his relationship with Satan and his angels, his cherubim.
Firstly, we have to look at the beast of Revelations 13 and the beast that rises from the earth. This beast has seven heads and ten crowns. Beasts are spiritual beings, heads are nations or kingdoms, and horns are people. People with royal lineage get to wear crowns. Taking this wearing of crowns at face value, we have to look for seven countries with king and queens and three places that have royalty, but they are not kingdoms. Principalities and the like. Of these horns, three fall and only one rises in its place, and this horn represents the Anti Christ. This Antichrist has a special relationship with Satan.
There are twelve sovereign monarchies in Europe. Andorra and Vatican City are overseen by priests and not by families. That leaves seven kingdoms: England, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Spain. There are Luxembourg and Liechtenstein, and Monaco, royalty, but not kingdoms. When the French Revolution occurred, many of the French royalty were killed, and a lot of property was confiscated. Napoleon Bonaparte then conquered most of Europe, and he was not part of the royal elite. There were already revolutions in Spain, Portugal, Italy, and Greece. He was eventually defeated, but this was a sign of things to come. Fearing the same fate, these royals approached the Rothschild’s, and together they created a financial system to control their assets. Resulting in the establishment of a banking system, so it did not matter whether they were kings or not, they still owned most things. The European cabal was established in the 1820s with Swiss banks. The Holy Roman Empire was being disestablished with little trouble to enable this new royal rule. Russia wanted to avoid being involved with the Jews, which was odd because they were direct descendants of the same families. The Rothschild's are often accused of ruling the world, but they are only bankers, the frontmen, and it is not their money. These days, companies like the Blackrock Hedge Fund have the royals' money. The vast fortune that they used to manipulate the world is the money of the old royals and, in turn, Satan's. Frequently, you can trace the money from the banks to them. All major US news outlets are owned by six companies. Look into the six companies, and you get back to hedge funds using royal money. The ten banks that own the Federal Reserve are mostly the property of European royals. These are the ten that will be kings for a day, Rev 18. There are many stories of political intrigue that bump up against one of the royal families. When Joe Bidden started using the globalist catchphrase "Build Back Better," he was not the first person to use it. King Charles used it first at the opening of a World Economic Forum meeting a year earlier, where they announced that the world needed a great reset. He also is often the first speaker at WEF events. Karl Swabb from the World Economic Forum had regular conferences with Otto von Habsburg and, recently, his son Karl von Habsburg, the current Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire. He is also known as the Black Emperor, as his father was. In fact, Swabb is just the frontman for the Habsburgs and other royals. It was them who set up the World Economic Forum. Also, the EU.
The European Royal Houses. The Black Royals, a name that has its origins with Charlemagne and the Holy Roman Empire, and not the black bankers of Venice.
We have been talking about the faces of the royal families and the nations under them. These are for the public to see, but the real power lies behind them. The families, or royal houses, have been intermarrying for centuries. At some stage, they had kings and queens of every country in Europe. There are twelve main families, and none of them come from Britain. Ironically, the most influential of the royal families are foreigners in the country in which they reign. These families are from Savoy and Ivrea (Spain/Southern Italy/Sicily). Capet, the oldest and most stable of the houses (France). Wittlebach (Sweden), Nassau, (Netherlands, Luxembourg), Hohenzollern, Welf, Wettin, (Belgium German), Oldenburg (Denmark, Greece, England, Monaco, Germany, Norway), Wurrtenburgs, Bavarian and Habsburg (Liechtenstein, Holy Roman Empire, Germany, Austria).
Queen Victoria was from Hanover, a branch of the house of Welf; Queen Elizabeth was from Sax Coburg, the house of Wettin. King Charles is from the House of Oldenburg. These lines always go through the males. These houses are run by men, and they are the most powerful people on the planet. They have absolute rule and are above the law. Many years ago, the Queen recorded a Christmas Queen's speech. She revealed several things that had happened and were about to happen. She said she was sorry she could not stop these things, but they were being done by incredibly powerful people. These are the people she was referring to. Charles got the speech, rewrote it, and made his mother read it out word for word. The Oldenburg's, who now have the British throne, were also the Romanov's of Russia. It is one giant family, and in the 1810s they started a scheme that would protect their wealth and status for all time. These people set up the EU, with Otto von Habsburg (King of the Holy Roman Empire) as the driving force behind it. They call it the European Union, but its true name is the Third Holy Roman Empire. They are the power behind George Soro’s Open Society and the World Economic Forum. Their agenda is to bring about a Neo-Feudalism society. But it goes wrong. The Bible says their arrogance has made them fools. If you look closely at the things King Charles has said over the years, he truly is a fool. The first of these Black Royals was Otto von Volger, or Otto the Great, the first Emperor of the second Holy Roman Empire. Charlemagne was the first holy Roman Emperor. Charlemagne means Charles the Great. However, Otto was the one who turned it into a family affair.
If you think that the male intertwining of this family (and they are really one family) is scary. Look at the female side, and it is truly stunning just how much this is just one family. Stunning and quite disturbing.
The Antichrist is described as the beast of the earth, this head that rises and three fall before him. These heads come from the royals and, in turn, the royal families of Europe. One person from each of these families. From Savoy, Ivrea. Capet, Wittlebach, Orange/Nassau the family that started the Bilderburg Group, Hohenzollern, Welf, Wettin, Oldenburg, Württemberg, Bavaria, and Habsburg.
In 2022, Queen Elizabeth died and Charles became King of England. When the King of Greece died in January 2023, Charles became the most senior member of his family, the Oldenburg's. He also became the most senior member of his mothers' family, the house of Wettin. The other Wettin contender, a man called Rudiger Malgrave who would be the current King of Saxony, also died in 2022. We are now looking at a third line of German-based royalty, where Charles is the King. We are looking at the German lines because the Antichrist was called The Assyrian. The Assyrians ended up in German, the Arians. The Württemberg’s. The Germans did not let you become King if they thought you married below your rank. That has now changed, and who would the title of King of Württemberg go to when a King dies. He died in 2022. It would not go to Duke Wilhelm but to King Charles, despite what Wikipedia says. Three horns have fallen and one has replaced it.
The Roman Empire, which still ruled the world until there was a transfer to the USA. Some even argue that the USA is just a lapdog of the European royals and does not really make decisions for itself. Rome fell and was ransacked in 476. Their rule lasted for fifty years until armies from the Eastern Rome Empire drove them out. Eastern Rome loosely ruled from then until Charlemagne took control and Europe became the Holy Roman Empire. Thereafter, Europe was always Roman but in an evolving from. Rome never truly fell and has never gone away since Charlemagne or Charles the Great. If you trace through history, who would be the heir to the Holy Roman Empire. Who would be King of Europe today. That would be King Charles the Third. There is an excellent YouTube channel called Useful Charts you can check all this out on.
What are the ties to Satan and his fallen angels.
Revelations 12 says the most. Now war arose in heaven, Michael, and his angels fighting against the dragon. And the dragon and his angels fought back, but he was defeated, and there was no longer any place for them in heaven. Michael, the leader of God's army, defeats Satan, and Michael started it. I wonder what the actual offence was that Satan committed that finally caused it. In this part, he is called the dragon, and he has fellow angels supporting him. There was no longer any place in heaven for them. This is the original heaven. That leaves five places where he could have gone. The Second Heaven of demons and principalities, or the earth or ground. Paradise, Sheol, and the Lake of Fire are clearly out. Sheol has gates and is the abode of dead humans, with rulers likely more powerful or at least on the same level as Satan. The bottomless pit is a prison. That means Satan was cast to the earth. By this, I mean he lives on earth and has a physical address. 2B Veryevil Street, Hellshum, for example. I am in the process of writing a book tracing him through history.
Rev 12-9 And the great dragon was thrown down; that ancient serpent, who is called the devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world, he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him.
We have Satan and his angels, which are cherubim like Satan. It was not a third of all angels but of the cosmic angels or the cherubim. There were at least 313 cherubim cast out, and that is made up of Satan his twelve evil apostles. They are called the twelve families, many who can be traced from Venice to their current homes in Switzerland. Four will be the same families already mentioned. I do not know which. The three hundred other cherubim are divided into three groups. The Luciferians who control royalty and politics. The Satanists who control banking and industry. The Mollochians who control religion, medicine, and education. Each consisting of one hundred cherubim.
We are interested in the Luciferians. The Luciferians like all cherubim, can change shape. Many of these cherubim have been king and queens of different countries. Just as Satan was called the kings of Tyre (Haram) and Babylon (Xerxes the Great). Whether Charles is one of these cherubim, I am unsure. I think there must be something different about him to be the Antichrist. His real wealth goes into the hundreds of trillions. There is a reason why he appears to be a bit dumb. It is not much to do with the story, however, it is interesting. We can see this when we are first introduced to Satan in the Garden of Eden. The serpent is described as wiser than any of the beasts of the field. Rather than comparing him to the wisdom of man. Inferring a lower intellect and the reason they were resentful of man. Until man came along, the cherubim were the number one beings of God. Man came along, and we were smarter, and this shows up in the dumb things that the ruling elites do these days. Why Charles appears thick because of his relationship with the cherubim, and, of course, he is thick. He may even be a cherubim or part cherubim. There we have it, Charles meets all the requirements of being the Antichrist. They have been at this enslaving or returning to the feudal world for a while now. The first of these fifteen minute towns/gulags was presented by Charles back in the 1980s.
We have the Antichrist and have identified him. (Although Prince William has the same credentials.) Who is the False Prophet and who is the woman dressed in purple riding the beast in Revelations 17. These will be revealed in my next blog. They are here and they are stunningly wicked people.
The Greatest Ever Deception on Mankind
The Smallpox Vaccine
Not only did it not work, it made the infections worse.
The medical profession holds a most false relationship to society. Its honours and financial rewards are measured, not by the good, but by the evil it does. The physician who keeps some member of the family of his rich neighbour on a bed of sickness for months or years, may secure to himself thereby both fame and fortune; while the one who would restore the patient to health in a week or two, will be neither appreciated nor understood.
Russell Thacher Trall, MD, 1872
This is a workingmans version of an article by Roman Bystrainsk.
You can find the full article with all the notations on romanbystrainsk@substack.com
For decades, vaccination has been deeply ingrained in the medical community, legal system, and society at large. However, as a new generation of doctors began their careers and started administering vaccines, they encountered a disturbing reality. Despite their initial enthusiasm for vaccination, rooted in their education and societal upbringing, they soon discovered a disconnect between the promised benefits and the actual outcomes. The notion that vaccination was a safe and life-saving practice, perpetuated by Edward Jenner's claims, began to unravel.
A notable example is Dr. William Jefferson Guernsey, a young physician from Philadelphia, who took over his father's smallpox cases in 1875. Like his peers, he vaccinated patients of all backgrounds, driven by his conviction and adherence to the prevailing medical norms. However, as he treated more patients, he began to notice discrepancies between the expected results and the actual outcomes. The more he witnessed the failures and adverse reactions, the more he questioned the dominant narrative. It took a significant number of cases with severe reactions, cowpox infections, and vaccination failures to prompt him to reevaluate his stance.
Dr. Guernsey eventually realized that it was more lucrative and convenient to comply with the Health Boards' requirements, rather than risking his reputation and income by speaking out against the practice. He was horrified by the legal obligation to perform a medical procedure that he deemed questionable and even more disturbing, the fact that patients were forced to undergo vaccination in order to attend schools they were taxed to support.
Many other medical professionals found themselves trapped in a similar predicament, facing the threat of legal repercussions, financial losses, and professional ostracism if they dared to challenge the vaccination status quo. Here is a rewritten version of the text:
Despite their reservations, the majority of individuals felt compelled to vaccinate due to the triple threat of pressures. However, a select few doctors, driven by their unwavering integrity and perseverance, dared to defy the prevailing medical opinion and challenge the vaccination procedure.
One such doctor was Robert A. Gunn, MD, who graduated in 1866 and initially subscribed to the notion of vaccination. Between 1870 and 1872, a global smallpox epidemic swept across the world, including New York City, which had been deemed thoroughly protected by vaccination. As part of an investigative committee, Dr. Gunn uncovered disturbing evidence: despite a 95% vaccination rate, the number of smallpox cases and mortality rates had reached unprecedented levels, surpassing those of the entire century.
This revelation prompted Dr. Gunn to embark on an exhaustive study of the subject. He delved into the works of Jenner, the supposed pioneer of vaccination, as well as reports from the Registrar General of England and various health boards across the United States. His investigation revealed a startling pattern: nearly every smallpox patient had been vaccinated, with many having received the vaccine recently.
Dr. Gunn's critique of vaccination earned him a reputation, and subsequently, hundreds of children were brought to him each year, suffering from a range of debilitating conditions, including swollen arms, ulcers, erysipelas, and skin eruptions. In countless cases, these children's health was irreparably damaged for life.
Over three decades, he dedicated himself to an in-depth examination of the vaccination debate. His research revealed that most physicians unquestioningly accepted the safety and efficacy of vaccination, without conducting their own investigations. After years of meticulous study, he reached a stark conclusion:
The practice of vaccination, in my opinion, is the most misguided and harmful of all dogmas. I firmly believe that not a single individual has ever been shielded from smallpox through vaccination, while numerous cases of severe bodily harm and even fatalities have resulted from its use. The entire theory is based on unfounded assumptions that defy common sense and contradict established principles of physiology. Experienced physicians have encountered countless instances of skin eruptions, erysipelas, and syphilis that can be directly attributed to vaccination. If these cases were compiled into a single report, they would paint a more alarming picture than even the most horrific accounts of smallpox.
Similarly, Dr. Montague R. Leverson, a staunch advocate of vaccination, had been taught from a young age and throughout his medical education that vaccination was a harmless and effective safeguard against smallpox. However, a case he encountered in January 1894 prompted him to conduct an exhaustive study on vaccination. For eight years, he devoted an average of four hours a day, and sometimes up to 16 hours, to investigating the pathology of vaccination and smallpox. Ultimately, he was forced to conclude that:
The medical profession has been plagued by numerous fads, but none as abhorrent as the practice of injecting healthy individuals with the putrid matter of an animal disease. I must emphasize to the members of the Medico-Legal Society that there is no credible evidence to suggest that vaccination has ever prevented or will prevent an outbreak of smallpox, except in cases where the patient succumbs to the vaccine itself before contracting the disease.
For nearly two centuries, our profession has burdened humanity with a pernicious superstition and oppressive tyranny. Through inoculation and vaccination, we have contaminated the blood of humanity, catering to the power-hungry ambitions of the ignorant, greedy, and conscienceless. Despite the contributions of a few genuine physicians, our profession has been a blight on humanity throughout its existence.
Dr. Charles Creighton, a renowned professor at the University of Cambridge, is celebrated as a pioneer in British epidemiology. As one of the most erudite medical scholars of 19th-century Britain, he exerted a profound influence on the intellectual landscape of his time. His meticulous research and numerous writings earned him a reputation as a leading authority. His magnum opus, "History of Epidemics in Britain," is hailed as a paragon of accuracy.
In 1884, Dr. Creighton was commissioned to write an article on vaccination for the 9th edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica. Instead of regurgitating conventional wisdom, he embarked on an exhaustive examination of pro- and anti-vaccination literature from around the world. Initially, he shared the prevailing views on vaccination, but his rigorous investigation eventually led him to challenge the dominant opinions held by his peers.
When I commenced my research into vaccination in 1886, I was not immune to the prevailing biases that favoured established doctrine and practice. However, after months of meticulous research, I felt compelled to revise my opinions, which I had previously accepted without question.
In 1888, Dr. Creighton's groundbreaking research on vaccination was featured in the Encyclopaedia Britannica. Around the same time, he published two seminal works: The Natural History of Cow-pox and Vaginal Syphilis, and Jenner and Vaccination: A Strange Chapter of Medical History. These meticulously researched publications presented compelling evidence that challenged the dominant views on vaccination, ultimately leading Dr. Creighton to conclude that the practice was based on a "grotesque superstition." His provocative findings sparked controversy within the medical community, exposing the deep-seated nature of beliefs that had been passed down through generations. Dr. Creighton came to realize that the influence of ancestral traditions continued to shape the decisions of modern-day individuals, who relied heavily on the assurances of their predecessors.
As long as the medical profession continues to uphold the Jennerian doctrine of vaccination, it remains tied to the outdated thinking of the eighteenth century. The history of vaccination, from its inception to its current state, serves as a stark reminder that medical science is often driven by human biases rather than scientific objectivity. The refusal of medical leaders to acknowledge and correct their mistakes has become an inherited obligation, with each successive generation feeling bound to uphold the flawed theories of their predecessors. Today, anyone who attempts to defend Jenner's theories must be prepared to sacrifice their reputation for scientific and historical accuracy. Consequently, many individuals with a reputation to protect decline to take on this challenge.
The widespread trust in vaccination persists largely because people struggle to accept that a respected profession, driven by scientific principles, could have been mistaken for such a long time. It's difficult for the general public to comprehend how a prestigious profession could have been so consistently wrong. As Carlyle's maxim states, "An error is not fully refuted until we understand not only that it's an error, but also how it came to be." When I began this book, I sought to understand how the medical profession worldwide fell under the illusion of vaccination. I believe they were primarily misled by the term "cowpox," which was used to introduce the new protective measure. Jenner bears sole responsibility for this initial error, which was flawed from its inception and further compromised by its secretive publication. The medical profession has historically upheld erroneous doctrines and harmful practices, which were supported by its authority for generations.
Dr. Creighton's newfound awareness led him to realize that questioning vaccination would come at a significant personal cost. Despite his exceptional credentials, intellect, and meticulous research, his comments hinted that both he and his groundbreaking work would ultimately be dismissed and relegated to the margins of medical history.