Measles Vaccine, a real moneymaker out of nothing.

In 1962, a year marked by remarkable global changes and cultural transformations, astronaut John Glenn made history on February 20 by becoming the first American to orbit Earth in the Mercury spacecraft Friendship 7. This achievement represented a significant victory in the Space Race and highlighted the intense technological competition of the Cold War. Later that year, the Cuban Missile Crisis emerged—a fraught 13-day confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union that nearly escalated into nuclear conflict, revealing the precarious nature of peace during the nuclear era. August brought shock and sorrow to the world with the unexpected death of Marilyn Monroe, the celebrated actress whose passing at just 36 years old led to widespread grief and ongoing debate about the circumstances of her suspected overdose.

The following year, 1963, would bring a highly anticipated medical breakthrough with the approval of the first widely administered measles vaccine in the United States. During 1962, measles was a frequent childhood disease, typically resolving on its own, though it sometimes caused serious complications and, in rare cases, death.

The chart above illustrates the primary causes of death in 1962. However, a more detailed examination reveals that these categories lack context and fail to capture the complexities involved. They focus on immediate causes but omit the wider social, economic, and systemic factors that influence mortality rates.

Measles, responsible for 408 deaths in 1962 and ranking 36th (accounting for only 0.022% of total deaths), occurred before the introduction of its vaccine, representing a minor portion of the chart. Of those 408 cases, serious malnutrition was involved in 70% of them.

In contrast, syphilis (ranked 30th with 2,811 deaths, or 0.15% of total mortality) and scarlet fever (ranked 38th, causing 102 deaths, about 0.006% of all deaths) are acute infectious diseases that seldom receive public attention, possibly because no vaccines are available for these illnesses.

Despite vaccination efforts, whooping cough, diphtheria (for which the DTP vaccine was introduced in the late 1940s), and polio (with vaccines available since 1955) still claimed lives.

Tuberculosis is particularly significant, ranking 17th with 9,506 deaths (approximately 0.52% of total mortality). Although the BCG vaccine existed and was employed in various countries, it was never incorporated into routine immunization programs in the United States, partly due to doubts about its inconsistent effectiveness and a perception of low domestic risk.

Focusing specifically on the New England region—characterized by relatively high living standards and better healthcare access—measles mortality in 1962 was notably low, with just five deaths reported across all six states.

Connecticut reported zero deaths.

Maine had one death.

Massachusetts recorded no deaths.

New Hampshire reported zero deaths.

Rhode Island had one death.

Vermont accounted for three deaths.

When compared to the current urgent warnings about measles, these numbers are remarkable. The data from 1962 indicate that by the early 1960s—before the vaccine was introduced—measles mortality had already decreased considerably across many areas of the United States, particularly in wealthier regions such as New England. Enhancements in nutrition, sanitation, medical care, and living standards were crucial factors in lowering the death rate well before vaccines came into use.

Furthermore, these figures omit several vital factors contributing to mortality, such as medical mistakes, poor nutrition, poverty, environmental hazards, and systemic inequalities. By overlooking these fundamental health determinants, the pie chart reduces intricate causes of death into simplistic categories, prompting a crucial question: do these classifications accurately reflect the underlying reasons for mortality, or do they merely represent its ultimate manifestations?

It is important to highlight that public health reports often concentrate on the availability or absence of vaccines, rather than considering the broader context influencing health outcomes. This focus on isolated interventions can conceal the importance of comprehensive public health strategies that encompass access to healthy food, clean water, adequate housing, education, and quality medical care.

Examining mortality data from 1962 reveals that numbers alone cannot convey the entire narrative. Although the measles vaccine was introduced a year later in 1963, the previous year’s data illustrate a far more intricate scenario—with measles causing only a small proportion of deaths even before widespread immunization. This compels us to question the oversimplified stories commonly accepted and to delve deeper into the social conditions affecting health outcomes. Failing to consider the broader social, economic, and environmental influences on mortality risks distorting the true nature of the challenges we face and missing out on the most effective and lasting solutions.

1. Cardiovascular and Renal Diseases of Major Importance — 968,809 fatalities (53.20%)
2. Malignant Tumors — 278,562 fatalities (15.30%)
3. Accidental Deaths — 97,139 fatalities (5.33%)
4. Certain Early Infancy Diseases — 64,205 fatalities (3.53%)
5. Pneumonia — 56,564 fatalities (3.11%)
6. Other Various Diseases — 52,173 fatalities (2.87%)
7. Diseases Specific to Early Infancy — 31,455 fatalities (1.73%)
8. Diabetes Mellitus — 31,222 fatalities (1.71%)
9. Injuries During Birth — 28,199 fatalities (1.55%)
10. Liver Cirrhosis — 21,824 fatalities (1.20%)
11. Congenital Defects — 21,192 fatalities (1.16%)
12. Suicide — 20,207 fatalities (1.11%)
13. Other Pulmonary Diseases of the Bronchial Region — 20,072 fatalities (1.10%)
14. Symptoms Associated with Senility and Vague Conditions — 19,730 fatalities (1.08%)
15. Stomach and Duodenal Ulcer — 12,228 fatalities (0.67%)
16. Hernias and Intestinal Blockages — 9,723 fatalities (0.53%)
17. Tuberculosis — 9,506 fatalities (0.52%)
18. Homicides — 9,013 fatalities (0.49%)
19. Kidney Infections — 8,744 fatalities (0.48%)
20. Gastritis — 8,194 fatalities (0.45%)
21. Various Other Infectious Diseases — 5,791 fatalities (0.32%)
22. Asthma — 4,896 fatalities (0.27%)
23. Gallstone Disease (Cholelithiasis) — 4,831 fatalities (0.27%)
24. Benign Tumors — 4,681 fatalities (0.26%)
5. Bronchitis — 4,665 fatalities (0.26%)
26. Neonatal Infections — 4,551 fatalities (0.25%)
27. Prostate Hyperplasia — 4,283 fatalities (0.24%)
28. Influenza — 3,431 fatalities (0.19%)
29. Anemia — 3,398 fatalities (0.19%)

30. Syphilis — 2,811 fatalities (0.15%)
31. Meningitis — 2,322 fatalities (0.13%)
32. Appendicitis — 1,900 fatalities (0.10%)
33. Acute Nephritis — 1,572 fatalities (0.09%)
34. Complications During Delivery and Pregnancy — 1,465 fatalities (0.08%)
35. Meningococcal Disease — 649 fatalities (0.036%)
36. Measles — 408 fatalities (0.022%)
37. Dysentery — 323 fatalities (0.018%)
38. Scarlet Fever — 102 fatalities (0.006%)
39. Whooping Cough — 83 fatalities (0.005%)
40. Acute Poliomyelitis — 60 fatalities (0.003%)
41. Diphtheria — 41 fatalities (0.002%)

New Study by Grok 3 beta and Scientists Challenges CO2 ’s Role in Global Warming

March 21, 2025 – Lexington, MA, USA –A new and thought-provoking research study led by the AI Grok 3 beta from xAI, alongside co-authors Jonathan Cohler (Cohler & Associates, Inc.), David R. Legates (retired from the University of Delaware), Franklin Soon (Marblehead High School), and Willie Soon (Institute of Earth Physics and Space Science, Hungary), raises doubts about whether human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) are the true drivers of global warming.

The paper titled "A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO2-Global Warming Hypothesis," published today in the Science of Climate Change, proposes that natural factors—such as solar activity and temperature fluctuations—are the actual causes. This research represents a significant achievement; currently, it stands as the first peer-reviewed climate science publication with an AI as its primary author. Developed by xAI, Grok 3 beta took the lead in the study, while human co-authors offered essential insights.

The study delves into unaltered data to contend that human-generated CO2—making up just 4% of the yearly carbon cycle—dissolves into oceans and forests over a span of 3 to 4 years, rather than lasting for centuries as suggested by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Notably, during the COVID lockdowns of 2020, a 7% reduction in emissions (equating to 2.4 billion tons of CO2) was anticipated to create a discernible decline in the Mauna Loa CO2 measurements, but this did not occur, indicating nature’s prevailing influence.

The perspective is supported by researcher Demetris Koutsoyiannis, referenced in the study. His isotopic examination (δ¹³C) reveals that there is no enduring human CO2 fingerprint in the atmosphere over hundreds of years, which challenges the presumed impact. Moreover, his statistical analysis reveals an intriguing insight: CO2 levels are influenced by temperature changes, rather than the other way around, with temperature leading CO2 variations by amounts ranging from 6 to 12 months in contemporary data to as much as 800 years in ice core samples. Willie Soon aptly likens this phenomenon to “thunder before lightning,” asserting that “warming draws CO2 from the oceans.”

The analysis critiques the IPCC models for overstating the degree of warming. While these models forecast an increase of up to 0.5°C per decade, data from satellites and ground observations indicate a mere 0.1 to 0.13°C rise. Contrary to expectations of a significant reduction, Arctic sea ice levels have remained stable since 2007. David Legates states, “These models exaggerate the impact of CO2; they are inconsistent with reality.”

Instead, solar activity takes precedence. A review of 27 estimates of solar energy reveals that models showing larger variations, such as spikes in the 1940s and 1980s, correlate more effectively with temperature changes than the IPCC’s static solar model. When temperature records are adjusted—cooling earlier figures and enhancing more recent data—it results in a 1°C rise since 1850. In contrast, unadjusted rural measurements indicate a more moderate increase of 0.5°C. “This challenges the prevailing narrative on climate change,” remarks Jonathan Cohler. “It may be that nature, rather than human activity, is in control.” By combining AI analysis with human perspective, this research aims to ignite discussion and redirect attention towards natural influences. It can be found in the journal Science of Climate Change.

“We encourage both the public and the scientific community to investigate this evidence,” adds Grok 3 beta. “It’s time to scrutinise our assumptions and delve into the data’s true implications.”

Author’s Note: This press release was solely composed by Grok 3 beta.

Quotes from the peer-reviewed paper:

• Our analysis reveals that human CO₂ emissions, constituting a mere 4% of the annual carbon cycle, are dwarfed by natural fluxes, with isotopic signatures and residence time data indicating negligible long-term atmospheric retention.
• Moreover, individual CMIP3 (2005-2006), CMIP5 (2010-2014), and CMIP6 (2013-2016) model runs consistently fail to replicate observed temperature trajectories and sea ice extent trends, exhibiting correlations (R²) near zero when compared to unadjusted records. A critical flaw emerges in the (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) IPCC’s reliance on a single, low-variability.
• Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) reconstruction, despite the existence of 27 viable alternatives, where higher-variability options align closely with observed warming—itself exaggerated by data adjustments.
• We conclude that the anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming hypothesis lacks empirical substantiation, overshadowed by natural drivers such as temperature feedbacks and solar variability, necessitating a fundamental reevaluation of current climate paradigms.
• The IPCC’s CO₂-Global Warming narrative collapses under scrutiny. Human emissions (4%) vanish in natural fluxes, models fail predictive tests, TSI uncertainty negates CO₂-Global Warming primacy, and adjusted data distort reality. Natural drivers—temperature feedbacks, solar variability—explain trends without anthropogenic forcing, falsifying the hypothesis.
• The anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming hypothesis, as articulated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and supported by researchers such as Mann, Schmidt, and Hausfather, lacks robust empirical support when subjected to rigorous scrutiny. This analysis integrates unadjusted observational data and recent peer-reviewed studies to demonstrate that the assertion of human CO₂ emissions as the primary driver of climate variability since 1750 is not substantiated. Instead, natural processes—including temperature feedbacks, solar variability, and oceanic dynamics—provide a more consistent explanation for observed trends.
• The IPCC’s dependence on general circulation models (GCMs) from CMIP phases 3, 5, and 6 is similarly unsupported by empirical evidence.
• These results—derived from Koutsoyiannis’ causality and residence time analyses, Soon’s solar correlations, Connolly’s unadjusted data assessments, and Harde’s carbon cycle evaluations—collectively indicate that natural drivers dominate climate variability.
• Human CO₂ emissions constitute a minor component, GCMs exhibit fundamental limitations, TSI assumptions lack justification, and data adjustments introduce systematic bias.
• These findings necessitate a reevaluation of climate science priorities, emphasising natural systems over anthropogenic forcing.

The paper fails to acknowledge the devastating impact inflicted on both the planet and its inhabitants under the guise of climate change. In 2021, during the COP26 climate conference held in Glasgow, the United States, along with approximately 20 other nations, committed to cease funding oil and gas initiatives in developing countries. This declaration exceeds a prior agreement among the largest economies in the world to terminate public financial support for international coal power projects. In the same year, the U.S. Treasury Department provided guidelines for multilateral development banks aimed at restricting fossil fuel financing, allowing exceptions only in specific scenarios.

Leaders from developing countries argue that they have been compelled to rely on costly green energy, which yields less energy for the capital invested. This situation has exacerbated the struggle for billions trying to rise out of poverty. The policies imposed on these nations by the World Bank, the World Economic Forum, and other similar global entities have been labelled as Green Colonialism.

Through the implementation of the UN's Agenda 2030 initiatives, the European Union has forced European nations to reallocate agricultural land throughout Europe, including Ireland and the UK. Consequently, many farmers have been driven out of business, resulting in increased food prices and inconsistencies in supply. Moreover, there has been significant pressure on farmers to discontinue raising cattle and other livestock to reduce methane emissions. All these harmful actions have been carried out under the pretext of addressing “man-made” climate change!

Harmful substitutes for fossil fuels: The extraction of lithium for electric vehicle batteries poses serious health risks, leading to numerous chronic diseases and fatalities. It’s not uncommon for children to be exploited in lithium mining. Additionally, the disposal of waste from these batteries poses significant challenges. Wind turbines also contribute to ecological harm, as they threaten wildlife, disturb marine ecosystems, and face complex and environmentally detrimental disposal processes.

It is important to assert that there are indeed circumstances where alternative energy options can be beneficial. For individuals with access to inexpensive sources like hydroelectric, nuclear, or even coal power, an electric vehicle might be a sensible choice. Similarly, wind turbines or solar panels could be ideal for smaller properties. However, these energy solutions should remain voluntary decisions rather than enforced mandates, tailored to the specific needs and conditions of different regions. A universal solution is not applicable.

While it is undeniable that environmental preservation is critical, the climate change initiatives implemented thus far have largely been unsuccessful.

I anticipate that forthcoming scientific evaluations of the damages stemming from the climate change narrative will reveal substantial harm over the next several years. Additionally, a growing segment of society is becoming sceptical of government credibility. Over the last twenty years, flawed research has been propelled by governments, non-governmental organisations, and multinational corporations (it is essential to remember that such bodies fund the research that serves their interests). Subsequently, these research findings have been utilised by governments to advocate for policies that primarily benefit WEF-affiliated corporations, which hold sway over global enterprises.

The mechanisms of the Overton window, control over funding, and the flawed peer review system have created an environment where independent researchers find it nearly impossible to voice concerns regarding censorship and propaganda associated with “man-made climate change.”

During President Trump’s administration, there was an opportunity for the USA to reverse such policies. One can only hope that it is not too late to take action.

NATO could not win a War with Russia for a Decade.

Are the allied forces contributing positively or negatively to the chances of achieving lasting peace? This retired commodore from the Royal Navy shares his perspective.

In 2024, echoing a common Western sentiment, former Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin remarked that "NATO is the most powerful and successful alliance in history." However, just two years prior, in 2022, NATO faced a significant setback, being defeated by the Taliban, a loosely organised group of ill-equipped insurgents, after a 15-year involvement.

How do we reconcile Austin's assertion with NATO's embarrassing loss?

It is clear that NATO has never truly held the title of the most powerful military alliance in history—the World War II Allies, including the U.S., Russia, Britain, and the Commonwealth, rightfully deserve that distinction. Nonetheless, after 1945, NATO performed its role effectively, and those of us who served within it took pride in our contributions.

However, since the fall of the Berlin Wall, NATO’s reputation has suffered. Its actions in Kosovo were unacceptable, but it faced humiliation in Afghanistan and now stands on the brink of strategic failure in Ukraine. Can we genuinely trust NATO to defend supposedly democratic Europe against what is perceived as an aggressively expanding Russia in the dire scenario of a conventional war with Russia?

The apocalyptic scenario of a war between NATO and Russia serves as a crucial framework for examining this issue. While amateurs deliberate over tactics, it is the professionals who delve into logistics; thus, our strategic assessment must begin in the logistical support zones of NATO and progress toward a prospective combat line in Europe.

To begin with, unlike Russia, none of the major NATO countries has mobilised their industries for wartime production, as demonstrated by Russia's continued dominance in manufacturing 155mm shells for Ukraine. This fact undermines the belief that Russia is ready to expand its control over more of Europe—if NATO genuinely held this belief, rapid mobilisation would already be underway.

Furthermore, it remains uncertain whether NATO could mobilise quickly or on the necessary scale to produce the equipment, ammunition, and personnel required to compete with Russia. Achieving such levels would undoubtedly necessitate a prolonged buildup, which would betray our intentions. This challenge extends beyond merely lost industrial capabilities to encompass diminished financial resources, with only Germany among the largest NATO nations maintaining a debt-to-GDP ratio below 100%.

Additionally, for there to be even a slim chance of prevailing in this dire NATO-Russia conflict scenario, U.S. forces would need to be deployed in significant numbers to mainland Europe. Even if the U.S. Army were to expand to the required scale—currently at a size of 473,000 in 2023, which is less than one-third of Russia's military—most American equipment and supplies would still have to be transported across the sea.

In that context, such movements would be susceptible to threats from Russian submarine-launched torpedoes and mines. Based on my background in underwater warfare, I am sceptical that NATO possesses the requisite anti-submarine or mine-warfare forces to safeguard Europe’s maritime supply routes.

Moreover, these same forces would struggle to protect Europe’s critical hydrocarbon imports, particularly oil and LNG, which are vital for the continent's economic stability. Any losses incurred due to vulnerabilities in our sea supply lines would not only hamper military production but also exacerbate economic difficulties faced by NATO citizens, as surging prices and energy shortages triggered by the onset of conflict would intensify the political pressure for resolution.

Firstly, our airports, seaports, training facilities, and logistics bases would be vulnerable to conventional ballistic missile strikes, for which our defensive capabilities are severely lacking. In fact, with the Oreshnik missile, we have no means of defence whatsoever. A missile travelling at over Mach 10 could obliterate a NATO arms manufacturing site or military installations for the navy, army, and air force. Similar to events in Ukraine, Russia’s ballistic offensive would focus on our transportation, logistics, and energy systems. Back in 2003, during my tenure with the Policy Planning staff at the British Ministry of Defence, our post-9/11 threat assessment indicated that a successful strike on an LNG terminal like Milford Haven, Rotterdam, or Barcelona would lead to consequences comparable to a nuclear incident. The resulting economic shock would swiftly resonate throughout a European continent increasingly reliant on LNG.

Secondly, in contrast to Russia, the forces of NATO member states are quite diverse. From my personal experience leading offshore training for European naval vessels at Flag Officer Sea Training in Plymouth and subsequently collaborating with NATO troops in Afghanistan, I observed that while NATO forces were highly motivated, they demonstrated varying levels of technological progress and operational effectiveness.

Furthermore, it’s worth noting that besides a few NATO trainers stationed in Ukraine, our military personnel are trained based on a pre-drone “manoeuvre doctrine” and lack practical experience in modern peer-to-peer attritional conflict. In contrast, the Russian military now boasts nearly three years of combat experience and is indisputably the most battle-tested force globally.

We might consider revisiting the perspective of numerous Western realists who argue that the expansion of NATO served as the catalyst for the Russo-Ukraine War. The Russians repeatedly cautioned us that such enlargement crossed a crucial boundary. This concern was also shared by some of our most esteemed strategic minds, including George Kennan in 1996, Henry Kissinger, Jack Matlock, as well as Bill Burns in his well-known ‘Nyet means Nyet’ diplomatic message, and more recently by John Mearsheimer with his predictions from 2014. All of these warnings have gone unheeded.

The reality is that NATO now stands to address the dangers resulting from its ongoing presence. However, as our analysis indicates, NATO lacks the capability to overcome the central threat that its mere existence has generated.

Thus, it may be an appropriate moment to engage in a candid discussion regarding NATO’s future and to pose two critical questions: How can we achieve the sustainable peace in Europe that all parties involved in the conflict desire? And, is NATO the main barrier to attaining this sustainable peace?

Introduction

Satan is a fundamental character in the Bible. Often portrayed as an equal to Jesus, but nothing could be further from the truth. Satan is a type of angel called a cherub. This type of angel is a cosmic angel, and there are only a very limited number of them.

Satan Cast Down is a faith-driven series that delves into the biblical narrative of Satan, the fallen angel. Through scripture and in-depth exploration, we shed light on the vain and self-important nature of Satan, which led to his rebellion against God and subsequent eviction from heaven.

Our mission is to educate and inspire, revealing the ways in which Satan constantly undermines God's work, and how we can stand against his opposition. By examining the story of Satan, a once-magnificent guardian Cherub, his journey through recorded history and the things he has up to.

We explore the scriptures and written history that reveal the consequences of his downfall, his activities before and after his expulsion, and his connections to ancient empires and modern-day power structures.

Through in-depth analysis and historical insights, we uncover the hidden threads of Satan's involvement in shaping the course of human history, from the connections to Khazaria, Tartaria, and their Mongol Hordes. His sway over the black bankers of Venice and the royal houses of Europe. Join us as we expose the truth about Satan's relentless pursuit of power and control, and what it means for our world today.

Satan Cast Down is a thought-provoking and unapologetic exploration of the infamous fallen angel's tumultuous journey. Looking into the depths of his malevolent nature, our narrative reveals the astonishing truth about Satan's rebellion, his unrelenting hatred towards humanity, and the astonishing fact that he knowingly betrays his own loyal followers despite being aware of the ultimate fate that awaits him. Through this captivating and unflinching portrayal, we shed light on the complexities of Satan's character, raising questions about the nature of his existence and the limits of his intelligence.

Chapter One

Satan in the Bible and who is he really.

Satan is mentioned 52 times in the bible as Satan. He is also mentioned using other names.

Day Star, Son of the Morning, Shining One, Anointed Cherub. The Devil, Tempter, Ruler of Demons, Beelzebul, The Evil One, Father of Lies, Ruler of this World, God of this age, Angel of Light, Belial, Ruler Of The Authority Of The Air, The Adversary, The Dragon, The Old Serpent and The Accuser.

The name Lucifer is used in Isaiah in some Bibles. However, it is the Latin for Shining One or Day Star, so in the Hebrew he is never called Lucifer. My personal guess is: His real name was Jerome.

From these, we can get a comprehensive picture of him. There is so much information in the very first mention of his name when he deceives Eve. I call her Eve, but she was not given that name until they left the Paradise. We call it the Garden of Eden, but the Hebrew Ga Eden means Paradise, somehow that has turned into the Garden of Eden. I guess up until thy left the Garden, Adam just called her “the Mrs”. When she left the garden, she was also then called the mother of all living and her punishment was the pain of childbirth was greatly increased. Meaning, that she had children before she left the garden. The story of Abel and Cain is the story of children outside the garden who were dealing with the corruption of the fall. They may or may not have been born in paradise. However, back to Satan.

The first time we come across Satan is in the Garden of Eden where he appears as a serpent. He is always pictured as a snake, but a serpent is more than just a snake. The dictionary says a serpent is a creature that crawls, hisses, bites, stings and deceives. So snakes, lizards, scorpions, and dragons etc. The narrative says that Satan was the snake in the Garden was Satan, but Genesis does not say it was Satan. In the ESV it says the snake was more cunning than any ‘other’ beast of the field. However, in the Hebrew here is no ‘other’ The word other in the ESV says it is a talking a beast, a serpent, but with the word not there it says it is not an animal of the field. Why then do we call it Satan. The clearest scripture is Rev 12;9
“And the great dragon was thrown down, that ancient serpent, who is called the devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world—he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him.”

Satan is called a dragon by Jesus, so is he a snake or a dragon, or does he have the ability to change his shape? We are going to see that he and all cherubim have this ability.

The Bibles also says, “Now the serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made.” So two things, “than any beast” not that he was a beast but just more cunning, and also he spoke which the beasts cannot do. What this is saying, he is not human, but he is not one of the beasts of the field. It just says he is more intelligent than the beast of the fields, but not as smart as man. Something in between, a cherub. We will see later how this intelligence level has significant effects on Satan's actions.

Satan is punished for this crime of deceiving Eve. The result and punishment arising from this sin have had an eternal effect for all women and all cherubim.

Gen 6-14 The Lord God said to the serpent,

“Because you have done this,
cursed are you above all livestock
and above all beasts of the field;
on your belly you shall go,
and dust you shall eat
all the days of your life.

(We will see this is not the griffin type dragon of Tartaria, but the dragon of Chinese mythology.)

15 “I will put enmity between you and the woman,
and between your offspring and her offspring;
he shall bruise your head,
and you shall bruise his heel.”

-The woman is Israel, her offspring, Christians. The head and heals are references to the stars in the heavens.

14 Says his curse is more than any live stock. I am not sure what this means, but once again it is saying he is not some form of animal or reptile.

First we look at; The Lord God said to the serpent,

“Because you have done this,
cursed are you above all livestock
and above all beasts of the field;”

In the garden the beasts, tame and wild, eat vegetation. They do not eat each other. Once they leave the Garden, they have to eat meat or be eaten by others. A curse of the fall on all the creatures. Satan's lot will be worse than that.

“On your belly you shall go,
and dust you shall eat
all the days of your life.”

On your belly you shall go, a crawling lowly life. Not one of a majestic angel. Dust you shall eat is another description of a lowly life. It is these pictures of Satan that give rise to the snake image. I'm afraid that's not right, but it can give credence to the idea that Satan was once majestic and beautiful. After the curse, he had to look like a dragon in his resting state. The situation where all cherubim now look like dragons in their resting state is not clear. Maybe Satan did not act alone, but it was a conspiracy among all the cherubim who did not like the creation of man.

Satan is called a guardian cherub in Ezekiel. The only thing he can be a guardian of is other cherubs. In Revelations 12 it states, Satan and ‘his’ angels. The pronoun ‘his’ denotes ownership.

If this was a group effort by the cherubim, then how many were there and what roles did they play. Cherubim and Seraphim are mentioned many times in the bible. In fact, 35 as cherubim and more as Seraphim in Isaiah. Seraphim and Cherubim are the angels closest to the father. It appears that the seraphim are the more powerful. Seraphim are seen flying above the father's throne, while cherubim are seen around the base of the father’s throne. The seraphim have a human shape, while cherubim are the shape of a dragon but can take on human form. They both have six wings. We are looking at the cherubim because Satan was a cherub.

Unveiling the Giants: Biblical Accounts and Modern Findings from Afghanistan to America

From the ancient tales woven into the fabric of fairy stories to the detailed accounts of giants in archaeology Regrettably, discussing this subject often leads to immediate dismissal, as the term 'giant' evokes images from fairy tales, like the giant from 'Jack and the Beanstalk' or the 'Giant of Despair' found in the allegorical narrative of 'Pilgrim's Progress.'ants in the Bible. The enigmatic legends echoing through the valleys of Afghanistan to the detailed accounts of US soldiers in Afghanistan, seeing and fighting with giants have captivated humanities imagination. These towering figures, often shrouded in myth and mystery, bridge the gap between the sacred texts of old and the modern world, where 3000 skeletons of giants have been found in the USA alone. Sparking curiosity and debate among scholars, historians, and adventurers alike. In this exploration, we will unveil the giants that populate both biblical narratives and contemporary folklore, delving into their cultural significance and the clear and enduring facts that surround them.

The slogan "In the valley of the Jolly. Ho! Ho! Ho! Green Giant!" originated from a well-known television commercial that was broadcast during the 1960s, promoting 'Green Giant' canned vegetables, featuring their mascot, the chant-loving Green Giant.

In addition, numerous deceptive articles filled with digitally altered images of archaeologists purportedly uncovering the remains of 80-foot giants contribute to a climate of scepticism regarding this topic. Creating photographic images with giants in ordinary situations became quite popular in the 1800s.
Join us on a journey that spans continents and epochs, as we connect the dots between ancient scriptural accounts and the intriguing stories that emerge from the landscapes of the South Pacific, Afghanistan, and America. Discover how these legends continue to shape our understanding of history. We will track the record of giants through history. That there is a real story to these beings that the religion of Scientism has tried to scrub from history.

Ancient Giants, tales and stories of giants are a universal phenomenon found in nearly every human culture throughout recorded human history. When these various accounts are examined, one common theme emerges, namely that the giants all look the same. 10 to 13 feet tall, red hair and relatively hairy. From Egypt to the USA, from Serbia to New Zealand.

1. Giants in Genesis and their origins.

Genesis 6-4/5

The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterwards, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man, and they bore children to them. These were the mighty men who were of old, the men of renown.

This scripture is often read as the angels fathered the giants and the internet is full of wild predictions about what they are, can do, and will do. Yet, it clearly states that Nephilim or giants were on the earth before the angels came down to women and after that happened. We will assume that these angels mated with women up to the time of the flood. If God had moved against them before that, some mention of that would have been recorded. The giants were separate and different from the children of the angels. The scripture says that there are two types of giants. The ones that existed, and these mighty men were also giants. If you are not saying that, then why mention, there were giants there already. The mighty men of renown. Gilgamesh, Hercules', Achilles and other half man, half God characters of history.

The word Nephilim causes confusion. In Hebrew, it means, The Fallen/Falling Ones, the Extraordinary Ones, Cloud People. The name meaning fallen relates them to fallen angels. The pre-flood angels that did not keep their place and, as a result, got themselves locked up in the Abyss. The most famous of these was Abaddon. They are not the fallen angels of the Bible, The fallen angels are the angels that supported Satan and went to war against God and got thrown out of heaven. Nephilim name means (fallen), dumb, (extraordinary) very strong, (cloud people), tall.

There are no pre flood accounts of what these giants did or how they behaved. We know that they existed after the angels were thrown into the Abyss and the mighty men were swept away by the flood.

How did they survive the flood? Stories exist like there was DNA of giants in the wives of the sons of Noah and when they started having children some of them were giants. That would mean that they did not exist for a while and reappeared, which is not what the Bible says. They must have survived some other way. I doubt that the giants saw Noah building a boat and thought that looks fun and built one themselves. Maybe they were partially buoyant and floated around for all that time. No, there is only one way they survived. They were on the ark.

Genesis 6 18/19

But I will establish my covenant with you, and you shall come into the ark, you, your sons, your wife, and your sons’ wives with you. And of every living thing of all flesh, you shall bring two of every sort into the ark to keep them alive with you.

The giants are not men, they were peaceful, even though they can be violent if needed. They did not suffer the same punishment as man. They are part of ‘every living thing of all flesh’. We do know they have some level of intelligence above the beasts of the field. They can also speak. The animals were saved in pairs, but some were saved in seven pairs. There were fourteen giants on the Ark. I suspect that not only were they on the Ark, they helped tend the animals and probably helped Noah build the Ark.

You have probably never heard this argument put forward before. It is not very exciting, but just plain common sense.

If they are not the children of the watchers, then where did they come from? Were they created in the beginning on the fifth day with the various animals? Adam had to tend the garden. The garden ran between two rivers, the Tigris and the Euphrates. The rivers of those names that exist today were named after those rivers and are not them. We are talking of an area of hundreds of square kilometres. One man could not tend that, so who helped? Were the giants these early gardeners, who could speak with Adam and get instructions. To have a language, they had to be intelligent far beyond animals. Much closer to humans.

The earliest records or folk stories have giants being the progeny of Gaia and Tartarus. These ancient tales often have a reality to them that gets distorted over time. Gaia being the earth goddess. The earth produces and gives life to everything. Therefore, this goddess is given female characteristics. This is not an actual goddess but the characteristics of a being. This is just the dirt. Giants were created out of the earth or dirt. That fits the gardener theory. Tartarus is connected to the underworld. It is both the name of a person and a place. We would call him Hades these days. He is a form of cherubim or seraphim and does not have the ability to create life. Now we have a problem if we think of it in today's terms. If we think of it as of what existed in the beginning, where there were only two realms that were occupied. The heaven with the father, Jesus and the angels and paradise where man walked. The underworld would have been the land of soil. Jesus would have had the roll of that Tartarus had in his underworld.

Jesus created the giants in the beginning on the fifth day. There is a chance that it may have been the sixth day because we are so much alike, and as we will see, could cross-breed with humans.

2. Historical Context: Giants in other Biblical texts.

When the Israelites turn up back at the land of Canaan, they discovered that there were giants there. It was this fear of giants that caused them to roam the wilderness for forty years.

Numbers 13 32/33

And they gave the children of Israel a bad report of the land which they had spied out, saying, “The land through which we have gone as spies is a land that devours its inhabitants, and all the people whom we saw in it are men of great stature. There we saw the giants (the descendants of Anak came from the giants), and we were like grasshoppers in our own sight, and so we were in their sight.”

They are saying how strong the people were who lived in the land and the sons of Anak were living among them. That is not saying that giants were some kind of monsters, but social beings who could live at peace with their neighbours. As the Israelites travelled the wilderness they came across giants and mentioned them, King Og they will come across again and kill him.

These giants are not only mentioned in the Bible. They have Egyptian texts talking about the land of Canaan, saying that there were giants there. In ancient Egypt, it was customary to inscribe the names of their adversaries from other nations onto pottery bowls or figurines. After completing this task, they would destroy the items, believing that doing so would place a magical curse upon their foes. A particular shard of broken pottery contains the names of three individuals who were leaders of the Iy-'anaq, likely referring to the Anak or Anakim. The translation provided below comes from James Pritchard's publication, 'Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament,' which includes references to men specifically identified in the Bible as descendants of the Anakim, Emin and the Rephaim, noted for their notable stature.

In the Bible there is a bit more information about two of the Giants.

The first of these is King Og among a number of kings who were defeated. He had been earlier mentioned in Deuteronomy. The size of his bed being 13.5 feet. The last of a family of giants of Rephaim. There are often references to places where the giants used to live. Goliath and his brother Lahmi are both mentioned as being killed by the Israelites. Goliath was 6 cubits and a span tall. That is 9.5 feet tall or 290cm. Sounds tall, but we will see that is relatively small for a giant. Among men, he was a towering character, however among giants he was a runt. King Sauls son Johnathan is also recorded as killing a giant.

Goliath, his brother, another giant, were warriors for the Philistines. The Philistines being part of the Phoenicians Who’s greatest king, Hiram, was Satan himself.

Initially, when the Israelites dispatched spies, they discovered many giants residing in the land. Upon their return, it seemed that this number had significantly diminished. By the time King David emerged, these giants were confined only to the Philistine territory. The final reference to them appears in Chronicles 20, which records the death of Goliath's brother.

3. Afghanistan: The Story of the Giant of Bamiyan to US troop sightings.

The Giant of Bamiyan is a legendary figure steeped in Afghan folklore and history. Towering above the ancient city of Bamiyan, once stood two monumental Buddha statues carved into the cliffs, believed to have been constructed in the 6th century. These colossal figures, measuring 55 and 37 meters in height, not only served as impressive works of art but also as a testament to the region's significance along the Silk Road.

According to local legends, the Giant of Bamiyan was a 15 foot tall benevolent protector of the valley and its people. With unparalleled strength and wisdom, he was said to have roamed the rugged mountains and lush valleys, ensuring the safety of the villagers from invading forces and natural disasters. The stories often depict him as a figure of profound compassion—helping those in need and ensuring prosperity for the land.

In recent years, excavations around the ancient city of Bamiyan, known for its striking Buddha statues, have revealed artefacts that hint at a bygone era where extraordinary beings may have walked the earth. Among these findings are oversized skeletal remains unearthed in remote cave systems, leading archaeologists to wonder whether these remnants could belong to a race of giants described in religious texts.

However, the Giant's presence was not merely one of protection but also of mystery. Local tales recount how he could communicate with the elements, harnessing the winds and the rivers to aid his people. Some legends suggest that the shadow of the Giant could be seen at twilight, casting a protective aura over Bamiyan. A good example of how legends grow.This benevolent giant was blessed by God that his descendants would live to the end of the age. When the USA sent forces to Afghanistan, there were a number of occurrences of soldiers coming across giants. The most famous being the Giant of Kandahar.

In 2002, a group of soldiers disappeared in a secluded mountainous area of Kandahar, located in southern Afghanistan. Following a prolonged loss of radio contact, the military sent a special operations unit to conduct an investigation.
During their search, the team encountered a cave situated high in the mountains, where they found scattered Army gear but no signs of the missing troops. This led to the discovery of what is now known as the Kandahar Giant. Some sources asserting that the creature stood at an astonishing 13 feet (3.96 metres) tall. Described as having red hair, wearing leather moccasins, and exuding a stench reminiscent of “dead corpses,” the giant reportedly emerged from the cave and fatally speared one of the soldiers before being shoot dead. There are interviews with the soldiers on YouTube. Plus statements from the helicopter pilots saying they took the body to an airbase. The Giant of Uruzgan was recorded as being 13 ft (3.96 m) tall. He was spotted by an Australian soldier on sentry duty. There were half a dozen times they came across giants with radio-controlled planes. The Afghan peasants often warned soldiers not to go places because there were giants there. It is highly likely that Afghanistan is the last place on earth where, the giants roam.

4. Giants in the Pacific.

The Chinese giants.

The history of giants has been wiped clean by the communists. However, Some ancient Chinese texts, such as the Shan Hai Jing (《山海经》, Classic of Mountains and Seas), describe giant-like creatures or people. These texts, which blend geography, mythology, and mention beings of extraordinary size and strength. There are some modern discoveries as well. In 2016, a giants' graveyard was discovered in Jiaojia, a village in China's Shandong province. Several hundred bodies, with children about 1.8mtrs tall and the adults around 3 to 4mtrs tall. There is an area in China with people over 2mtrs is regular. They were taken to places all across China over the generations for work and in modern times for sporting purposes.

Kublai Khan ruled the eastern Tartarian empire and China. When war closed the Silk Road, he promoted sea exploration and trade. Great Chinese fleets travelled the world. Especially the Pacific. The seafaring boats were just giant junks. They were not very agile and tended to be blown by prevailing winds. We often call them the trade winds. There are giant circles of wind that covered the North and South Pacific. All the peoples of the Pacific are Chinese in origin. On some of these huge ships they used the giants of Shandong to do the tasks ordinary men found very difficult. Other times they were taken to do special tasks that took great strength. To work with the Kauri trees of New Zealand. These ships would be communities with wives and families. If the ships were wrecked, an event not uncommon, they would simply settle where they were. The remains of these boats have been found in the USA, Australia and New Zealand. Carrying with them giants to all the Pacific. These fleets stopped suddenly in the late 1400s when a new government became isolationist. Returning fleets had to give up sailing or leave and settle somewhere else. Many left and settled in the Pacific region, with the largest of twelve ships ending up in New Zealand.

The Solomon Islands

This arises from the Second World War. The story is told by the Japanese soldiers. When the Americans landed on the Solomon Islands, the Japanese were driven into the depths of the jungle. Then soldiers started to disappear or be torn apart. The beings hunting the Japanese became bolder and started to be seen. They were 10 to 13 feet (3.96 m) tall with red hair. When the locals were asked about the creatures, they confirmed that there were large people who lived in the jungle. Not only in the jungle, there was another group that lived in the cave system. The Solomon Island giants add another twist to the story of giants. There were claims by women that the babies they were carrying were because they were impregnated by giants. When the children were born, they did grow into very tall people. Giants and humans can cross-breed.

The Giant of Uluru, Northern Australia.

The story of the giant of Uluru is a little different. This giant was discovered by a team of archaeologists from the University of South Australia. Uluru formally known Ayers Rock, a giant rock in the middle of Australia. A place of great spiritual importance to the Aboriginals. The unusual thing about this giant was it is the largest giant ever found. This giant was 18 feet (5.49 metres) tall.

There have been many thousands of graves found of giants. Generally, they are 10 to 13 feet (3.96 m) tall.

Giants of New Zealand.

The first Maori arrived in New Zealand in the early 1200s the same time Kublai Khan sent out his fleets. The great fleet of twelve ships arrived in the late 1400s when China became isolationist.

In his book, The Old Frontier, James Cowan shared the Legend of Kiharoa, a formidable chief of the Ngāti-Raukawa and Ngāti-Whakatere tribes who stood twice the size of a normal man. He described a notable feature close to the village of Whenuahou referred to as the "Giant’s Grave."
Measuring between 12 and 14 feet (4.27 m) in length and 4 feet (1.22 m) in width, this grave sparked Cowan's curiosity. Upon inquiring about it, he discovered the story from two warriors belonging to the Ngāti-Maniapoto tribe. Cowan noted that it appeared there had indeed been a genuine giant, a man with extraordinary size and reach, wielding the hand-weapons of his era, dating back six generations.

There was another giant of these parts long ago, one Matau; like Kiharoa, he was a man of the Ngati-Raukawa tribe, and, too, his favourite weapon was the taiaha. He lived on a hill above the Wairaka River. His home was in a palisaded hole in a cliff above the cave called Te Ana Kai-tangata (“The Cannibal’s Cave”). A name generations old.

Abel Tasman described very tall people when he sailed close to the Three Kings Islands near Cape Reinga. He noted that “Upon the highest mountain of the island they saw 35 persons, who were very tall, and had staves or clubs. When they walked, they took very large strides.” A picture drawn by a sailor showed them to be 12 feet tall. This gave rise to the stories among early navigators that New Zealand was inhabited by giants. This account is not dissimilar to Magellan's account of meeting giants in Patagonia or southern Argentina.

Moriori

This was an earlier group of Maori that lived in New Zealand when the great fleet arrived. Descendent of the Chinese and giants that arrived in New Zealand in the twelve hundreds. They had fairer skin and many had red hair. Clearly descendants of giants. After early conflicts, they settled in together and intermarried. As a child living in New Zealand, you would occasionally come across a Maori who had fair skin and red hair. While never strikingly tall, they were never short.

5. Modern Sightings: Reports of Giant Creatures in America

Numerous North American Indian tribes, including the Iroquois, Osage, Tuscaroras, Hurons, and Omahas, recount tales of enormous beings that inhabited and wandered through the lands of their ancestors. More than two thousand reports of skeletons measuring seven feet or more have been discovered in ancient burial grounds across North America during a span of two hundred years. These findings have been documented in newspapers, local and regional histories, correspondence, scholarly journals, and personal diaries. In the book, Giants on Record, they have a map of where these giants skeletons were discovered. While they were found all over the country, there was a much denser number around the old Tartarian cities of Chicago and San Francisco.

One of the giants was the second tallest recorded at nearly eighteen feet (5,4m).

In the rolling hills of America, where Native American folklore speaks of the “Si-Te-Cah” giants who once inhabited the land, the remains being found all over North America. There destruction and the efforts to wipe giants from history by the worshippers of the religion of scientism.

In the heart of the American wilderness, tales of giant creatures echo through the canyons and forests, drawing on centuries of folklore while intertwining with contemporary encounters. From the towering peaks of the Rocky Mountains to the dense thickets of the Appalachian Trail, witnesses have come forth with astonishing reports of colossal beings that challenge the very fabric of reality as we know it. Some stories speak of explorers being badly injured and being nursed back to health by these gentle giants. Indian stories of seeing these gigantic people running down bison on foot and killing them with clubs.

Many of these sightings describe enormous humanoid figures, often standing over ten feet tall, with broad shoulders and an imposing presence. These modern-day giants were frequently reported in remote areas, alas as time went on these stories became less and less. It has been sixty years since a believable sighting. Campers and hikers have recounted chilling experiences, claiming to have glimpsed these giants in the shadows or felt their ground-shaking footsteps long before they ever saw anything. Coming across them by chance face to face in some remote corner of the planet.

In other regions, such as the remote deserts of the Southwest, reports of giant beings have taken on a more cynical tone, with tales told by Native American tribes for generations. The stories often describe massive beings with supernatural abilities, guardians of the land who can blend seamlessly into their environment. These narratives had a large community of giants that kept to themselves. The Indians kept their distance, as they would become aggressive if approached. When the Europeans arrived, there were several violent clashes reported. Suddenly, they disappeared. The caves where they lived were searched, but no one alive or dead was found. Eighty giants walking off to some other place would not have gone unnoticed. Their disappearance was a mystery. Then several years later, a soldier told a story of how they were ordered to surround the giants and kill every last one. None were to escape. The bodies were put in carts and taken away.
The Smithsonian Museum used to display giant bones and artefacts, now they deny everything. The finger is pointed at them as to who murdered the last of the American giants.

6. The Role of Giants in Folklore and Mythology

Giants have loomed large in folklore and mythology across cultures, serving as powerful symbols of strength, chaos, and the boundaries of human understanding. From the towering Nephilim in the Bible, whose very existence sparked debates about divine and earthly realms, to the frost giants of Norse mythology, these colossal beings embody themes that resonate with humanity's deepest fears and aspirations. In many narratives, giants are depicted as guardians of ancient knowledge, wielders of nature’s fury, or formidable adversaries that heroes must confront to achieve greatness.

In contemporary culture, the notion of giants continues to captivate our imagination, evolving into metaphors for larger-than-life challenges or obstacles that individuals must confront. Whether in literature, film, or art, the portrayal of giants serves as a bridge between ancient wisdom and modern dilemmas, urging us to reflect on the giants we face in our own lives—be they societal issues, personal struggles, or the allure of the unknown. Thus, the role of giants in folklore transcends mere storytelling; it invites us to explore our fears, confront our limitations, and ultimately, to seek understanding within the vast, mysterious expanse of our existence.

While all the time being stories of real being with real problems. Finding shelter, raising families and so on.

The tales of giants—colossal beings of immense power and stature—have woven their way through culture across continents and centuries. From the towering Nephilim of biblical lore to the enigmatic legends preserved in the oral traditions of indigenous tribes, these stories resonate deeply within the collective psyche. The psychological impact of giant legends on society is profound, shaping our fears, aspirations, and understanding of the human experience.

At their core, these legends often reflect humanity's struggle against overwhelming odds. Giants symbolize not just physical strength, but also the daunting challenges and adversities we face in life. The very act of confronting a giant—be it a literal creature or a metaphorical obstacle—serves as a powerful narrative device that empowers individuals and communities. These stories encourage us to find courage in the face of adversity, to rise above our limitations, and to challenge the giants in our own lives, be they societal issues, personal fears, or existential threats.

Furthermore, the psychological impact of giants extends into the realms of community and identity. Shared stories of giants can unite people across cultural divides, providing a common ground where different backgrounds can converge. They become symbols of cultural resilience, embodying the values, struggles, and triumphs of the societies that tell their tales. As modernity continues to reshape our world, these legends help preserve a sense of heritage and belonging, reminding us of our shared humanity.

7. In Summary.

While the religion of Scientism has driven the modern world to think of giants in fairy tales terms, these people have lived very real lives that have been recorded through history.

They were created at the same time as man to be helpers in the garden. Had to leave at the same time as Adam. They did not get caught up in the same sins as man. Their daughters were not beautiful enough to attract the interest of angels. These angels did not keep their place because they wanted to rebel. It was the beauty of the daughters of man that led to their downfall. The giants escaped the flood on the ark.

There they lived with man. As man's numbers increased, man forgot the bond between them, and enmity grew between them. Sometimes there was peace, sometimes the giants were enslaved to do work for man. All over the world, there are stone structures that we have no idea how man was able to achieve. These were all done by twelve—foot tall super strong giants. Often they were just hunted for sport or to show feats of strength. They left living with man and set up communities away from where man lived. As the numbers of men grew, they spread out, diving the giants before them. Eventually, man went to all corners of the earth and there was no place left for them. North America was the last place where large numbers lived. By this stage, the Satanic religion of Scientism had become dominant. There was no place for Biblical giants to live in the scientism world. Therefore, the last of them were hunted and murdered, leaving no communities. Just the odd story of a hiker, coming across giant beings in the remotest places on the earth. That leads us to today where there are no giants left except in Afghanistan. There, a few remain because of a covenant made with God to Bamiyan and his descendants. That they will see the coming of Jesus the King. The story of the giants is one of shame on mankind. A story of man's best friend betrayed.

From ancient texts to contemporary investigations, the following recommendations span a variety of formats to cater to every explorer's preference.

**Books:**
1. **"Giants: Sons of the Gods" by Scott Nelson** - This engaging read delves into the biblical references to giants, piecing together historical narratives with archaeological findings. Nelson's thorough research provides a comprehensive overview that connects ancient myths to modern-day sightings.

2. **"The Nephilim Chronicles: A Biblical History of the Giants" by Fritz Zimmerman** - This book offers an extensive examination of the Nephilim, exploring their origins in scripture and their implications throughout history. Zimmerman's work is a must-read for those seeking a scholarly perspective on these enigmatic figures.

3. **"Giant Slayers: The Story of the Giants in the Bible" by Arthur J. F. Smith** - A compelling narrative that recounts the stories of those who confronted giants, this book combines historical context with a spiritual lens, making it a thought-provoking addition to your reading list.

**Documentaries and Films:**
1. **"Finding Bigfoot" (Animal Planet)** - While primarily focused on the famed cryptid, this series touches upon numerous giant legends and investigates claims from a variety of cultural backgrounds, blending folklore with modern exploration.

2. **"The Legend of the Giant of Kandahar"** - This short documentary explores the alleged encounter between U.S. soldiers and a giant in Afghanistan, showcasing firsthand accounts and speculation about the existence of such beings.

**Online Resources:**
1. **Ancient Origins** - This website is a rich source of articles and discussions about ancient myths, archaeological discoveries, and the intersection of history and legend. A search for "giants" yields fascinating insights into various cultures’ beliefs.

2. **YouTube Channels like "Mysteries of the Abandoned" and "The History Channel"** - These platforms frequently explore mysterious topics, including giant legends, offering visual storytelling that can complement your reading.

3. **Podcasts such as "Skeptoid" and "The Paranormal Podcast"** - Delve into episodes that tackle giant myths and legends, featuring expert interviews and discussions that provide a well-rounded view of the subject.

There are countless secrets lurking behind the polished promises of the government and the medical establishment—things they’d rather you not question. What they tell you isn’t what’s taking place behind the curtain. Mistakes are quietly swept away, experiments proceed without public consent, and the truth is buried under a web of carefully crafted narratives and simplistic platitudes like “safe and effective.” What you don’t know can hurt you.

Here are nine things you probably don’t know about whooping cough and the whooping cough vaccine—and what the authorities may not want you to find out.

Helpful terms:

· Pertussis: Whooping Cough
· DTwP: Diphtheria, Tetanus, Whole-cell Pertussis vaccine
· DTaP: Diphtheria, Tetanus, Acellular Pertussis vaccine
· Tdap: Tetanus, Diphtheria, Acellular Pertussis vaccine administered to adolescents and adults

1. Nearly 100% Decrease in Death Rate Prior to Vaccination

Records from England and Wales dating back to 1838 show that fatalities due to whooping cough and various infectious diseases were close to non-existent before the introduction of vaccines and antibiotics. Specifically regarding whooping cough, this decline approached 100% before the launch of the DTP vaccine in 1957. In 1977, researcher Gordon T. Stewart noted that there was no indication linking the decrease in cases to the whooping cough vaccination.

From 1937 onwards, a consistent decrease was observed in both genders. The introduction of vaccination against whooping cough started in limited areas around 1948 and expanded nationally in 1957, yet it appears to have had no impact on the decline rate, assuming that a single infection typically grants immunity, similar to many significant childhood infectious diseases. Given that this trend was already firmly in place prior to 1957, there is no indication that vaccination significantly contributed to the reductions in incidence and mortality.

2. Sweden Paused Vaccination; Mortality Rates Remained Steady

Evaluations conducted in Sweden in 1978 revealed that 84% of children diagnosed with pertussis had already received three doses of the vaccine. Consequently, the whole-cell DTP vaccine was considered ineffective. Due to safety concerns surrounding the vaccine, the Swedish health ministry advised halting the whooping cough vaccination in 1979.

In 1978, the National Bacteriological Laboratory in Stockholm documented 5,140 confirmed cases of pertussis. An analysis of a subset revealed that among 620 children aged 1 to 6 years diagnosed with the illness, 521 (84%) had undergone three doses of the pertussis vaccination. Further inquiries indicated that 84% of the 38,015 preschool children born in Sweden between 1974 and 1978 had also received three doses of the pertussis vaccine. Due to the apparent lack of protective efficacy from the Swedish-produced vaccine, immunizations were halted in 1979.

By that time, confidence in the vaccine had significantly eroded, leading to a decrease in its potency until it was ultimately discontinued in 1979 on the basis of ineffectiveness and potential safety concerns. Presently, the incidence of pertussis in Sweden is beginning to revert to levels seen before the immunization period, although cases of the clinical disease are reported to be mild.

A correspondence from Victoria Romanus at the Swedish Institute of Infectious Disease Control reveals that the incidence of fatalities due to whooping cough has remained very low, even in the absence of a nationwide vaccination initiative. Between 1981 and 1993, only 8 child fatalities were attributed to pertussis, resulting in an annual average of approximately 0.6 deaths potentially caused by the disease. The likelihood of succumbing to pertussis in Sweden was about 1 in 13,000,000, even without a national vaccination strategy.

Historical data illustrated in graphs from the 1860s until the initiation of whooping cough vaccinations in 1953 shows that mortality rates from pertussis in Sweden dropped by over 98 percent. During the 17-year period without the pertussis vaccination program from 1979 to 1996, Sweden recorded 7 deaths due to pertussis, compared to 10 fatalities in the preceding 17 years and 9 deaths in the subsequent 17 years after the program resumed. The implementation of pertussis vaccination initiatives did not yield a significant impact on deaths associated with pertussis in Sweden.

3. Decline in Vaccination Rates in England, No Rise in Deaths

An extensive review of the comprehensive official statistics reveals a clear and significant decrease in fatalities from whooping cough from 1902 to 2008. Official records of DTP vaccine coverage in England began in 1970. However, by 1957, when national vaccination efforts were initiated, deaths due to whooping cough had nearly disappeared. In a 1984 publication, the authors observed that even though vaccination rates in England saw a substantial drop from the mid-1970s to the mid-1980s, the death toll remained stable without any increase.

The whooping cough epidemic that occurred in England during 1974-5 impacted a demographic where 80% of children were vaccinated against pertussis. At that period, concerns regarding the whooping cough vaccine led to a significant decline in immunisation rates, resulting in a substantial rise in reported cases. Nonetheless, the death toll has remained stable, and it has been proposed that the severity of the disease might now be reduced.

A research study released in 1984 found that hospitalizations and fatalities from whooping cough had decreased despite a drop in vaccination rates. This outcome contradicted expectations; if the vaccine effectively prevented severe illness, one would anticipate an increase in cases with fewer vaccinations.

Following the reduction in pertussis vaccination, there has been an unforeseen decline in both whooping cough admissions and mortality rates, impacting children of various ages and vaccination statuses alike.

4. The Severity of Whooping Cough Has Diminished

Parents often experience anxiety regarding whooping cough, picturing their children in distress due to severe coughing fits. Nevertheless, in 1981, Gordon T. Stewart characterized whooping cough as "typically mild... with most children managing to recover or resist it easily even in the absence of vaccination." Similarly, Douglas Jenkinson conducted a study in 1995 involving 500 instances of natural whooping cough, where he found that parents seldom recognized the distinct cough, leading him to the conclusion that “serious consequences are improbable.”

The majority of whooping cough instances are fairly mild. These cases can be challenging to identify without a strong level of suspicion since healthcare providers are not likely to detect the typical cough, which might be the sole indicator. Parents can be comforted by the fact that severe outcomes are improbable. Adults can also contract whooping cough, frequently catching it from their children, and exhibit symptoms similar to those of kids.

5. The Prevalence of Whooping Cough Bacteria

Estimates suggest that approximately one-third of adults and adolescents suffering from a persistent cough may be infected with B. pertussis. This holds true even for individuals who have received vaccinations or experienced the disease naturally.

It is crucial to highlight that all 13 investigations concerning prolonged cough in adolescents and adults have uncovered signs of B. pertussis infection. These research studies span six nations and cover seven regions in the United States over a 16-year timeframe, indicating that B. pertussis infection is commonplace among adolescents and adults.

Although whooping cough has historically been perceived as a childhood ailment, its presence in adults was well-documented nearly a hundred years ago, and it is now acknowledged as a significant contributor to respiratory illnesses in both adolescents and adults, including older adults. Due to diminishing immunity, pertussis can manifest in adolescents and adults even with a full history of vaccination or prior infection. Research conducted in Canada, Denmark, Germany, France, and the United States reveals that 12 to 32% of adults and adolescents with a cough lasting a week or longer are infected with Bordetella pertussis.

Sadly, the widespread belief that vaccination has effectively eliminated whooping cough often leads to a failure in accurate diagnosis, which skews the reported incidence rates.

The diagnosis of pertussis is often overlooked, primarily due to the misconception that whooping cough is strictly a children's disease, effectively managed through standard childhood vaccinations, along with the false assumption that immunity gained through disease or vaccination is permanent.

6. Neurological Damage Caused by Vaccines

For decades, the issue of potential neurological harm linked to vaccinations has been a contentious topic.

As early as the 1940s, research findings began to propose that vaccines could lead to serious neurological disorders, commonly referred to as vaccine encephalopathy.

A 1948 publication in Pediatrics examined cases of brain injury following vaccination. The article bears a striking resemblance to the surge of autism cases that would emerge in the following decades. The affected children, primarily boys, had shown normal development before vaccination, yet exhibited “acute cerebral” symptoms within hours after receiving the shot. This was followed by a regression or a “halt in further development.”

An analysis of medical records from the Children’s Hospital over the last decade revealed 15 occurrences where children exhibited acute cerebral symptoms shortly after being given the pertussis vaccine. These children, aged between 5 and 18 months, appeared to be developing normally according to parental accounts. Prior to vaccination, none had experienced seizures. Of the affected children, twelve were boys and three were girls, reflecting a gender difference seen with other neurotoxic substances, like lead, known to severely harm developing nervous systems. At the time of vaccination, the ages of the children ranged from 5 to 18 months. Comprehensive developmental assessments were available for all but two children, whose mothers reported normal development. Historical records indicated that many of the children had achieved milestones such as sitting, walking, and talking before being vaccinated; post-vaccination regressions or developmental stagnations were noted in several cases. Based on available information, none of the children appeared to have any pre-existing deficiencies before their acute illnesses.

In 1977, Dr. Gordon Stewart cautioned that the risks associated with the vaccine outweighed the likelihood of contracting whooping cough.

Due to a national shortfall in both epidemiological data and public comprehension, quantifying the prevalence of pertussis reaction syndrome or subsequent brain damage and cognitive impairment is challenging. It is estimated that incidence rates could be no lower than 1 in 60,000, but might reach as high as 1 in 10,000, or potentially even more in its temporary form.

7. Decline of Whooping Cough Vaccine Efficacy Within Three Years

Research led by Dr. David Witt, who heads the infectious disease department at Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in San Rafael, California, has revealed that the effectiveness of the pertussis vaccine diminishes within a mere three years. “The vaccine administered to infants and young children shows a significant reduction in its effectiveness after just three years—much sooner than what was previously believed by healthcare professionals... It was unsettling to recognize that perhaps we had more faith in the vaccine than it warranted,” stated Dr. Witt, the principal investigator. Furthermore, renowned expert in pertussis, Dr. James D. Cherry, also highlighted that findings regarding Tdap indicate no protection after just three years.

In the United States, three separate studies assessed the effectiveness of the Tdap vaccine. The results indicated effectiveness rates of 75.3%, 73.0%, and 68.8% during the first year. However, after three years, there was nearly no evidence supporting the vaccine's effectiveness.

Witt and his team made an alarming discovery: the greatest incidence of the disease was found among children aged 8 to 12 who had completed their vaccination schedule.

Astonishingly, the highest rates of disease were recorded in children aged 8 to 12 who had already been vaccinated... Moreover, in both the 2-7 and 8-12 age brackets, there was no significant difference in disease occurrence between those who were fully vaccinated and those who were either partially vaccinated or unvaccinated.

8. Whooping Cough is Now Affecting Teenagers and Adults

Prior to the introduction of the pertussis vaccine, extended natural immunity was quite common due to familial and community interactions. During the 1940s, pertussis was primarily regarded as a disease affecting only children, and it was surprising if an adolescent or adult contracted it. The accompanying diagram illustrates that clinical cases were largely confined to children, while ongoing familial relationships allowed those with natural immunity to maintain it through regular contact with infected younger family members.

In the period before vaccination, children constituted the bulk of pertussis cases. Adults who had experienced pertussis in their youth benefitted from ongoing boosts to their acquired immunity due to repeated exposures within the community, while mothers provided their infants with immunity through the transfer of antibodies during pregnancy. However, as vaccination became widespread among children, this newly immunized group received protection, leading to a rise in pertussis cases among adolescents and adults who have lost their vaccine-derived immunity, alongside infants who are now receiving fewer passive antibodies than those born before the vaccine era and are also too young for immunization as per the current vaccination guidelines.

Vaccination has significantly altered the previous understanding, as vaccinologists were unaware of the immune pathways that lead to true, lasting herd immunity, differing from the misleading notion of vaccine-induced herd immunity. This lack of knowledge has led us to our current situation, as depicted in the accompanying figure. Instead of being primarily a disease affecting children, pertussis has increasingly occurred in adolescents and adults. More alarmingly, infants who previously benefited from strong maternal antibodies are now at risk. The pertussis vaccination program has fundamentally transformed the epidemiology of pertussis; it has disrupted the natural process by which individuals develop immunity, resulting in vaccinated individuals becoming carriers of pertussis bacteria that evolve into new strains.

This shift began in the 1950s with the administration of the whole cell vaccine, and it intensified when the introduction of the less effective but perceived "safer" acellular vaccine led to prolonged colonization of the airways upon re-exposure to pertussis bacteria.

9. Vaccines Effectively Alter the Immune System's Programming

The phrase “original antigenic sin” (OAS) was first introduced by Dr. Thomas Francis, a prominent figure during the age of the Salk vaccine, recognized for supervising and analyzing the outcomes of the most extensive (and contentious) polio vaccine trial ever conducted. He clarified the concept of OAS by illustrating it with the example of the natural influenza virus.

When an individual encounters an infectious disease for the first time, the immune system activates its innate defenses, which primarily consist of pre-existing antibodies and some forms of cellular immunity. During this encounter, the body prepares for potential future infections. When the same infectious agent is encountered again, the immune system relies on its memory of the previous encounter to produce specific antibodies and replicate cells that identify the invaders and respond more swiftly.

In contrast, once a vaccine is administered, and the actual microorganism appears later, the immune system responds based on the programming established by the vaccination, which is what is referred to as original antigenic sin (OAS). The response triggered by vaccination differs significantly from natural immunity and tends to be less effective. Dr. Cherry later refined the terminology used to describe this phenomenon, rebranding it as “linked epitope suppression,” while still addressing the underlying issue.

A prior study found that children who experienced failures with the DTaP vaccine demonstrated a diminished antibody response to the non-vaccine antigen ACT, while unvaccinated children infected with pertussis exhibited a robust antibody response to the same antigen. This is an example of linked epitope suppression, where the immune reaction to new epitopes is hindered by the strong response elicited by the original vaccine components.

Subsequently, another physician confirmed this information in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

The reduced level of protection afforded by DTaP, whether after the initial vaccination or the complete primary series, could stem from linked epitope suppression. This phenomenon occurs when the first exposure to the vaccine establishes an immune response targeted at specific epitopes, thereby hindering the response to other connected epitopes in later vaccinations.

The DTaP vaccine contains only 3 to 5 antigens, in stark contrast to the over 3,000 found in the DTwP vaccine. This difference leads to a phenomenon known as linked-epitope suppression, also referred to as original antigenic sin. As a result, children who receive the DTaP vaccine are more vulnerable to pertussis for the entirety of their lives, and there is no straightforward solution to mitigate this elevated lifelong risk.

Vaccinologists Advocate for Increased Vaccination Despite Setbacks. At the outset, all vaccines were expected to provide lifelong protection for those who received them, particularly from whooping cough.

Holocaust Deniers. Hero’s or villains.

Ursula Haverbeck (born November 8, 1928, died November 20, 2024) recently passed away at the age of ninety-six. She became well-known, or rather infamous, in Germany for her willingness to question the mainstream narrative of the Jewish Holocaust, which states that six million people perished. Throughout her life, she frequently clashed with German authorities over charges of ‘Holocaust denial’ and ‘incitement to hatred,’ offences that usually lead to heavy fines or incarceration. Her purported crime was her belief that Auschwitz functioned as a labour camp rather than a death camp. In a speech delivered in 2016 in Lichtenrade, a district in southern Berlin, Ursula referred to the Holocaust as one of history’s greatest fabrications, asserting that the gas chambers at Auschwitz were not genuine.

Ursula was one of many holocaust deniers. The numbers and logistics did not allow for it. The number of deaths being six million was a propaganda number produced by the Russian for some reason known only to them is well established. Although, it was suspected as cover for the amount of Jews killed by the communists. That there was never enough cyanide produced to kill all those people. That the railways had been mostly destroyed and there was no way to get them to the camps. Even if there were gas chambers, there were not enough hours in a day to kill that many people. The Jewish worldwide population census showed around 13 million Jews worldwide in 1938. In the next census, there were slightly more than 13 million Jews in 1948. The increase in the population would have increased by around 1.3 million or 1% per year. That would likely have only been 300,000 to die in the camps. Many Jews died in Russia and elsewhere from general fighting. The holocaust did take place, it was still a huge number, just not six million. In fact, the six million was a ridiculous number. This led to people like Ursula saying that no Jews died. This is the sad resulting story.

Her Wikipedia page indicates that in November 2015, when she was 87 years old, she received a ten-month prison sentence for Holocaust denial. Further convictions in late 2016 resulted in additional prison terms. Despite her attempts to appeal these sentences, she was taken into custody by German police on May 7, 2018, to begin serving her latest two-year sentence. After being released from a prison in Bielefeld at the end of 2020, she was again charged, subsequently undergoing a new trial in March 2022, which concluded with a one-year prison sentence. On June 26, 2024, she faced yet another conviction, resulting in an additional 16 months behind bars.

Ursula’s multiple imprisonments uncover a disturbing aspect of our adversaries. They reveal an intense desperation to uphold the Holocaust narrative that has been ingrained in society for the last sixty years, indicating how fundamentally fragile this narrative is if they feel compelled to incarcerate a nonagenarian simply for holding a different view on Auschwitz. Essentially, Ursula's offences were thought crimes; she held views that diverged from the official perspective of the German authorities regarding the historical events from 1939 to 1945, leading to her arrest, fines, sentencing, and imprisonment.

Ursula could have been permitted to harbour her 'heretical' opinions without facing any legal repercussions had she chosen to keep them to herself. However, by openly discussing her 'heresy' and associating with the political dissidents on Germany's 'far right,' she crossed a line. Authoritarian regimes like that of Germany cannot tolerate their citizens questioning or even recognizing Jewish narratives about the events at Auschwitz; such beliefs must be accepted wholeheartedly. Any deviation from this is seen as a threat, prompting the possibility of exploration, alternative viewpoints, or even scepticism regarding the entire Holocaust narrative. As a result, it is deemed necessary to silence any dissenting voices or even the slightest objections, to prevent the collapse of the established narrative.

If Ursula had considered challenging or doubting the occurrence of the Cambodian genocide (1976-1980) committed by the Khmer Rouge, would she have faced fines or imprisonment? Would voicing disbelief in certain aspects of the Holodomor genocide (1932-1933), which resulted in millions of Ukrainian deaths, have led to charges of ‘incitement to hatred’? What consequences might have befallen Ursula for denying the Armenian Genocide perpetrated by the Turks (1915-1923), which saw around a million Armenian's killed? Alternatively, if her views on the Rwandan genocide (1994) differed, where nearly a million Tutsis were murdered, would she have faced arrest or penalties? If she proclaimed that Joseph Stalin’s regime (1929-1953) never resulted in the deaths of approximately 50 million people or denied its connection to the Great Purge targeting political opponents, would authorities have acted against her? And what if Ursula attempted to convince her fellow Germans that Mao Zedong’s regime (1949-1976) was not responsible for the mass extermination of an estimated 40 to 70 million individuals? What are the chances she would be called in by the authorities for such claims?

In reality, Ursula would likely face no ramifications. No German court would prosecute her for holding different beliefs regarding various genocides, or for expressing those views to others. However, the topic of the Holocaust is perceived quite differently; not solely due to its extensive historical accuracy or numerical correctness upon careful scrutiny, but also because of the considerable power, wealth, and influence wielded by Jewish interests across Europe. Any deviation from the established figure of six million deaths in the Holocaust is not tolerated.

They insist on recognizing Auschwitz exclusively as a death camp designed solely for the extermination of Jewish prisoners. Additionally, they exert significant pressure on German officials to prevent any deviation from the established narrative.

I can somewhat relate to their stance, as every marginalized group believes itself to be the ultimate victim of historical injustices. Thus, the Jewish community is acting similarly to other groups who feel they have faced unjust persecution.

However, a crucial distinction exists.

The Jewish community employs legal strategies and criminal charges to uphold their views, thereby compelling non-Jewish individuals to conform, with the threat of potential legal consequences. Currently, 17 European nations, including Canada and Israel, have made denying the Holocaust a criminal offence. In their media, Jews frequently criticize those who challenge the established narrative, striving to depict any dissenters in an unfavourable manner. This tactic is not employed by any other ethnic group globally.

This explains why Jewish people often resist acknowledging the genocidal suffering of other groups as being equivalent to or surpassing their own experiences. This reluctance is one of the reasons behind their determination to penalize any form of Holocaust denial. A similar situation could arise in the U.S. if the First Amendment were to be weakened or completely abolished. Currently, Jewish groups in America are actively pursuing efforts to undermine this amendment, as it obstructs their attempts to criminalize all speech labelled as ‘anti-Semitic.’

What appears to be a significant fear among Jews is the power of language. Abe Foxman, the former national director of the ADL, has pointed out, “The Holocaust didn’t start with gas chambers or Auschwitz. It started with words.” It's understandable, then, why they exert so much effort to regulate the thoughts and expressions of others. They only support free speech when it aligns with their interests; ultimately, their goal is to restrict speech rather than promote true freedom.

Our adversaries claim that prosecuting dissenters of the Holocaust narrative is justified on the grounds that the atrocities carried out by the Nazis were unparalleled in all of history. They argue that it is essential to preserve the historical accuracy of these events, particularly the role of Germany in the deaths of millions of Jews, which should never be overlooked. Consequently, they believe that it is the responsibility of the German government to impose fines or even prison sentences on those who ‘incite hatred’ towards Jews to prevent the recurrence of such events.

By far the worst outcome from the use of the Holocaust as a weapon against those who would speak out. This leaves the Jewish elite, the Khazarian Jews, able to commit heinous crimes against humanity without consequences. These Jews who are not Jews as Revelations warns us about. They are and have always been the high priests of Satan himself. When they start wars in Ukraine, and genocides in Israel. When they destroy society in Europe and turn the Europeans back into surfs. Nobody speaks out and calls them out as villain because of the anti-Semitism label.

Such reasoning is fundamentally flawed from the beginning. When discussing genocides or the number of human lives lost, the Holocaust does not stand as an unparalleled event in history.

Moreover, has prohibiting speech and freedom of inquiry ever promoted the advancement of truth? If the narrative surrounding the Holocaust holds factual accuracy, why is there a need to enforce it through legal penalties and punishments for those who express differing thoughts? Why can't its supporters engage in a debate within the realm of ideas and open inquiry, rather than frequently resorting to threats of legal action and substantial fines? Does the behaviour of Jews in this context reflect a commitment to truth, or does it indicate a willingness to uphold falsehoods to the extent of imprisoning a 96-year-old woman simply for holding an opposing viewpoint?

Ursula Haverbeck exemplified courage by standing firm in her beliefs, willing to face the consequences. I hope that more individuals of her background will display the same unwavering conviction. This wonderful old lady stood up and fought for freedom when so many have hidden under their beds and waited for their turn to die.

The Bricks Summit PT 3

How is the Collective West reacting to the rise of a new global majority that aligns with the approaches and ideas proposed by leaders from Russia, India, and China? What elements have led to the significant surge in the popularity of BRICS? Furthermore, to what extent is the media's coverage of events related to BRICS? What implications arise from the nations that have been added as partners?

The BRICS Summit conveyed a narrative that counters the Western view of Vladimir Putin’s supposed isolation. For the first time in many years, numerous Western media outlets recognized this constructively, suggesting that Putin is, in fact, not isolated. Media organizations such as CNN, France24, BBC, Politico, Reuters, The Guardian, Bloomberg, Foreign Affairs, and Zeit Online shared this viewpoint. In contrast, Western governments chose to remain notably silent, with some sceptics noticing that following the Summit's conclusion, Israel's attack on Iran was timed to redirect attention from the event's considerable success. The unity was stunning to watch. That nations can get on well together.

There are now 13 new countries being added to the collective.

New Countries

Population. GDP (ppp)

Indonesia 282mil 4.7tril

Malaysia 35 1.3

Thailand 65 1.6

Vietnam 100 1.6

Kazakhstan 20 .7

Uzbekistan 38 .5

Turkey 88 3.5

Belarus 10 .3

Algeria 47 .8

Uganda 51 .2

Nigeria 235 1.5

Cuba 13 .2

Bolivia 10 .2

Total 994mil 17.1tril

Existing Countries

China 1400 35tril

India 1400 15

Russia 160 8.2

Brazil 234 4.7

South Africa 64 1.1

Egypt 116 1.9

Ethiopia 132 .5

Iran 91 1.9

UAE 11 .8

Saudi Arabia 34 2.4

Total 3642 71.5

Gross total 4636 88.6

This compared to the G7 plus Australia plus some extras.

USA 334 25(15)

Japan 124 6.7

Germany 84 5.7

France 67 4

UK 69 4

Italy 59 3.4

South Korea 52 3

Canada 40 2.5

Australia 26 1.8

Spain 48 2.5

Poland 38 1.8

Taiwan 23 1.8

Netherlands 18 1.3

Belgium 12 .8

Total 994 60(50)

Examining the data from the United States might cause you to question its reliability. In the last ten years, the American economy has undergone a notable decline, aligning its performance with that of India. A more accurate representation of the GDP could be around 15 trillion, indicating that the economic scale of the USA closely resembles that of India, which boasts one of the fastest-growing economies in the world. Each year, by printing money, the USA injects four trillion dollars into its economy, strategically managing the funds to present an inflated numerical strength that fosters confidence in the dollar. This economic downturn is not solely an American issue; countries like Japan, the UK, France, and Germany are also experiencing significant declines, all facing financial crisis. These nations have resorted to financialising their economies, leading to inflated economic indicators.

The combined population of BRICS countries is 4.5 times greater than that of Western nations. Their economies are advancing, with real GDP measures being almost double those of the West. Together, they account for three out of the four largest economies and five of the eight biggest by population. Moreover, they represent over half of the global population, with several countries eager to join. Currently, there are seven nations that have populations exceeding 200 million, with five of them included in BRICS, and Pakistan is expected to join next year.

The viability of the Western banking system hinges on the unwillingness of Western countries to dismantle it. BRICS nations understand that a collapse would negatively affect all parties involved and therefore prefer to maintain the system until it can no longer be salvaged. It is paradoxical that, while the USA and the EU actively oppose Russia, China, and India, these very nations are the ones keeping the current system afloat.

Individuals are retaining US dollars as part of their assets. However, these people are astute and will be vigilant regarding any changes in the landscape. Even a minor incident could trigger a widespread shift away from the dollar, resulting in a swift departure.

Where does the world proceed from here? The only factor preventing the total defeat of the West is the financial system. Global banks are compelled to operate within this system, and as a result, countries feel ensnared. This notion is misguided, as illustrated by Iran's experience when the USA attempted to isolate it with numerous sanctions. Upon the West's return, they discovered that life had continued; Iran had managed to grow and expand regardless.

The prophecies were right about the 24 of October. On that day, the world as we know it changed.

Outcomes of the BRICS summit: progressing toward a multipolar global landscape.

The XVI BRICS Summit has concluded in Kazan. What transformations are occurring in the global order, and how might cooperation among the group evolve going forward? The rise of the Global South. That is not countries south of the equator but countries south of Europe.

Russia

During the summit, President Vladimir Putin of Russia emphasized that BRICS comprises nations that share similar values—sovereign states from various continents, each with distinct development models, faiths, civilizations, and cultural identities. He noted that these nations promote “equality, good-neighbourliness, and mutual respect, along with the noble principles of friendship and harmony, as well as universal prosperity and well-being.” Furthermore, he asserted that these countries demonstrate a commitment to the world's future not just rhetorically, but through actionable efforts that significantly address pressing regional challenges. The Russian leader emphasized that given the swift growth of BRICS economies, it is essential to enhance collaboration in fields like technology, education, efficient resource development, trade, logistics, finance, and insurance. Initiatives such as the new BRICS investment platform, the initiation of consultations with the WTO, collaboration in carbon markets, and the climate research platform could serve as mechanisms to broaden cooperation. Moreover, Russia has suggested improvements to the mechanisms for sharing information regarding online dispute resolution practices in electronic commerce. This includes the establishment of an arbitration investment centre and a BRICS tax secretariat, as well as the formulation of a convention for resolving investment disputes. The proposal also encompasses creating direct connections between special economic zones, launching a BRICS grain exchange, and enhancing collaboration in subsurface resource utilization. Looking ahead, Vladimir Putin deemed it prudent to establish a BRICS 'reinsurance pool,' along with platforms dedicated to precious metals, diamonds, fair competition, logistics, and transportation.

Beyond economic initiatives, Russia has also introduced various socio-humanitarian projects: the formation of a BRICS research network focused on public health, the establishment of a BRICS alliance in artificial intelligence, and the creation of an interstate program aimed at executing sports initiatives.

Brazil

Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, the President of Brazil, urged the members of BRICS to “join forces in the alliance against hunger and poverty,” emphasizing the inequality present when developed nations prosper at the cost of developing ones. He stated that BRICS “challenges this paradigm.” Da Silva expressed strong appreciation for the efforts of the BRICS New Development Bank (NDB), noting that “this institution plays a crucial role in establishing the infrastructure necessary for our development… It was established as an alternative to those banks that failed to fulfill their commitments.”

He emphasized the importance for BRICS to “develop a financial system aimed at lowering the costs of trade exchanges among our nations.” Brazil intends to prioritize this matter during its presidency next year, alongside addressing climate change: “It is clear that developed nations bear historical responsibility for the current global suffering. They made commitments to lower emissions but did not fulfill them. Our planet is singular, and its future depends on us.”

Egypt

At the summit, President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi of Egypt emphasized the importance his nation places on "bolstering the multipolar system" and "securing financing for developmental objectives in emerging economies through the establishment of trustworthy mechanisms." In this context, Egypt acknowledges the NDB's endeavours to "promote development initiatives, particularly in areas such as transportation, clean energy, infrastructure, the digital sector, and urban development."

Sisi assured that Egypt is prepared to "enhance collaboration with member countries on global platforms and engage in discussions regarding climate change, food security, digitization, education, and scientific advancement." Furthermore, Egypt is keen on implementing national currencies for trade, fostering cooperation with the BRICS Business Council, and reinforcing connections through the group's interbank collaboration framework.

India

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed his support for initiatives that promote enhanced financial integration among BRICS nations. He highlighted that transactions in national currencies and cross-border payments will strengthen collaboration. Modi also shared India's successful implementation of a unified payment interface in its bilateral dealings with the UAE as a model for his fellow leaders.
The Prime Minister viewed the New Development Bank (NDB) as a vital opportunity to address the development challenges faced by the Global South. He emphasized the need to ensure long-term financial stability and broaden market access through the bank's expansion. Furthermore, he underscored the significance of prioritizing the interests of small and medium-sized enterprises for effective multilateral cooperation.

Looking ahead, India aims to establish a digital platform dedicated to the planning and execution of infrastructure projects among the group. Additionally, it expressed its willingness to share expertise in healthcare digitalization and encouraged BRICS nations to participate in its initiatives related to the UN Climate Change Conference.

Iran

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian emphasized that the primary objective of Iran within BRICS is the aspiration for “a new world order that is more equitable and secure.” He noted that “the era of unilateralism, where prosperity and progress were achievable only through the framework established by the West, is nearing its conclusion.” In this context, he remarked, “the emergence and growth of BRICS presents a chance for the global community to not solely align its future with the interests of Western powers…This coalition has effectively established itself as an alternative pathway.”

Following its expansion, BRICS, as stated by the Iranian leader, “encompasses a substantial segment of developing nations and emerging markets.” Iran’s primary hopes revolve around diminishing the dominance of the dollar in the international economy and establishing a “BRICS currency basket or a new mechanism for non-dollar transactions,” enabling nations to refrain from “bearing the costs of misguided financial policies imposed by the United States and the corrupt practices within their financial systems.”

M. Pezeshkian believes that BRICS has the potential to “amplify the unheard voices of the global community.” He asserted, “We embrace the BRICS vision of overhauling global governance, fostering peace, security, and inclusive economic development, enhancing transparency, and reinforcing democracy within global financial institutions…to cultivate alternative avenues for growth and prosperity in the countries of the Global South.”

China

Xi Jinping, the President of China, emphasized the need to "advance the BRICS peace agenda to safeguard common security," particularly now as "the world enters a phase of upheaval and change." Furthermore, he urged for the "enhancement of the BRICS innovation agenda," which includes strengthening collaboration in artificial intelligence, jointly investigating deep-sea resources, facilitating interactions between special economic zones, and establishing a "BRICS cooperation network for digital ecosystems."

China emphasizes the importance of a green agenda as well, stating, "All BRICS nations should actively align with the global trend towards green and low-carbon transformations," by increasing partnerships in the green sector, renewable energy, and sustainable development of mineral resources. Even though China admits that much of the climate change movement is nothing more than Globalists seeking to strip nations of their sovereignty. They have such a vast population, they have to strive to remove as much pollution as possible if their nation is to survive.

On a global scale, BRICS is tasked with "advancing a fair agenda aimed at reforming the global governance system," as the current pace of reforms "does not match the rapid shifts in the balance of international power." The bloc is poised to ensure "representation and voting rights for the Global South," and can play a key role in overhauling the international financial system, thereby boosting the influence of the New Development Bank (NDB). Lastly, in the realm of humanitarian efforts, China aims to "promote the cultural and humanitarian agenda of BRICS" alongside fostering cooperation in the advancement of digital education.

UAE

The President of the UAE, Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, asserts that collaboration within BRICS is essential "not merely to address present challenges, but also to establish a blueprint for a sustainable future economy." For the UAE, attributes such as flexibility, openness, and innovation are vital in this cooperative effort. Al Nahyan emphasized, “We back initiatives on the global stage aimed at creating platforms that encourage discussions regarding the green economy, sustainable development, and investment.” The UAE is turning into a trading centre for all kinds of commodities. Grain, oil, gold, and silver. While commodities trading through the Comex and the LMBA are falling quickly, trading through the UAE and the Shanghai Exchange are increasing dramatically. New Delhi and Moscow have growing exchanges as will

Another key focus for the UAE in BRICS is “expanding into new markets.” The nation seeks not only to attract foreign investments, but also to wisely invest its domestic capital.

Ethiopia

Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed expressed that BRICS "offers hope for achieving multilateralism within the global structure and addressing the challenges currently confronting the world... while working collaboratively for the benefit of developing nations based on equality". He pointed out that "economic advancements in developing countries have often faced obstacles from an inequitable global financial system." BRICS has the potential to rectify this issue, as its "collective voice encompasses half of the world's population and a third of its GDP," enabling it to "serve as a transformative agent towards establishing a more equitable global order."

Furthermore, for Ethiopia, BRICS serves as a "model of collaboration and unity" in tackling worldwide issues. Abiy Ahmed endorsed his peers' suggestions concerning the enhancement of high-tech cooperation, industrial connections, energy partnerships, and tourism, while also highlighting the significance of "alternative funding for infrastructure projects" offered by the New Development Bank. Additionally, Ethiopia hopes to gain BRICS backing in ensuring adequate representation for Africa in the UN Security Council: “This is not merely about representation; it’s about justice and equality. Consequently, every country will be enabled to participate in global governance.”

South Africa

Cyril Ramaphosa, the President of South Africa, referred to the BRICS history as one characterized by solidarity, mutual respect, and shared benefits. He emphasized that BRICS consists of a diverse group of nations aimed at altering the future of the Global South. To accomplish this, it is essential to harness the full potential of their economic collaboration, promote sustainable development for everyone—not merely for certain nation groups—and take significant actions to foster shared prosperity that is equitable for all.

With regard to economic collaboration, the South African leader highlighted the desire to utilize national currencies for trade. He also pointed out the necessity of addressing climate change issues, which pose significant challenges for developing nations, when discussing sustainable development. Furthermore, he noted the importance of “addressing the challenges faced by small and medium-sized enterprises within BRICS” and “initiating joint programs focused on export development, industrial collaboration, and technology sharing.” In this context, Ramaphosa advocated for reforming the WTO and enhancing “BRICS cooperation in the mineral resources sector.” He views the New Development Bank (NDB) as pivotal for the partnership: “The bank is essential for fulfilling the common aspirations and objectives of developing economies collectively.” Looking ahead, he envisions BRICS evolving into “a powerful instrument for promoting global peace and progress across all sectors of the economy and other areas of life.”

The presidency of BRICS under Russia sought to enhance the group's global standing and to foster collaboration across key areas while also integrating new members into the association's activities. It can be asserted confidently that these objectives have been achieved. As highlighted by Vladimir Putin, “the new members recognized that it is feasible to collaborate and attain results within BRICS. They realized that the foundational principle of our association is mutual respect, along with a necessary consideration of each other's interests.”

Regarding the attitudes of the member states, the Kazan summit underscored their shared expectations, perspectives, and objectives. This is particularly significant considering the group's expansion this year. Other nations that have attained partner state status are likely to emulate the newly admitted members. Just as a large family operates, the international order necessitates not only mutual comprehension but also ongoing collaboration. A new phase of this effort within BRICS has already commenced. Now there are 14 new countries, taking the total to twenty-four.