Christchurch's killings, a look at the facts.
Tragedy has struck New Zealand, with dozens of Kiwis having their lives terminated before their time. We have one life, and it is sad that it is taken by broken people. The Government has tried with unbelievable zealous to hide every bit of information apart from their narrative, while the alternative media speculates widely about the facts and conspiracies. There is information out there, and this is an attempt to inform the average Kiwi and people of the world about what has happened. The information was gathered from mainstream corporate media and mainstream non Corporate. The information about the Israeli Defence Force came from an award-winning alternative site.
Brenton Tarrant
Brenton left Australia in 2010 to travel the world on the death of his father. There are two stories how he funded these travels. He inherited money from his father's estate, less than $50,000. This may have funded travels for a year or two, but thereafter, he needed some sort of income. The following has been hard to cross-check, but his time overseas goes like this. He travelled for two years and ended up in Israel. There he got dual citizenship and joined the Israeli Defence Force. He left after three years, but still had some connection to them. In 2018, there was a break in at the Spanish North Korean embassy where he was travelling at the time and was on the suspect list. He says, he funded his travels through a cryptocurrency called Bit Connect. Bit Connect did not appear until 2016 and was a scam, everybody lost their money. However, one story told by an acquaintance in Australia said it was Bitcoin, which would make much more sense. It only helped him in the past two years of his life. The last time he was in Australia, he made several donations to far-right groups. One of them, called The Lads, has been banned from Facebook. The Australian Security Service said he was not on their radar, which is incredibly unlikely or for some reason they were telling lies.
The closest thing he had to a trade was as a person trainer and a soldier, if that information was correct? The owner of the Gym where Tarrant was said to have worked denied that Tarrant was ever there. Tarrants father and mother emigrated from Israel to Britain to escape poverty in Israel, according to the UK Guardian. From Britain, they went to Australia and in 1970 became nationalised. Brenton was born six years latter, which makes him 42. He was said to have had little to do with women and spent a lot of time on the computer. He was liked and genial in his behaviour. His family said there was a dramatic change in his personality after travelling overseas. The photos of him in Pakistan do not show a person in a lot of stress from physiological problems. In fact, his statements about Pakistan showed he still had an appreciation of beauty.
He lived in NZ for five months before this event and was unemployed. He came to New Zealand twice but travelled all over the world in between visits. Countries visited by Tarrant included Pakistan, North Korea, Turkey, parts of Africa, Israel, Portugal, Spain, France, Afghanistan, and China. After he left Israel in 2017, he came to New Zealand and obtained a gun license and left again. As a foreigner, he could not get a permanent license unless he was a resident. The licence requires two references to be given. Who were they? this information is not available to us, but the situation is very wrong. He returned in October 2018 and kept a low profile before the shooting. He lived in Dunedin, a city of 120,000 people and about a four-hour drive from Christchurch. In court, he was seen making a hand symbol which the media claims is a symbol of white supremacy, but it is not. That sign that looks like an upside down 6 is the sign of 666, particularly when it is made in front of the crutch area. It is a demonic and Satanist symbol. These satanic symbols come up again and again.
The video and shooting.
This video was quickly scrubbed from Facebook. Anyone possessing it in New Zealand was subject to up to 14 years in jail. They were very keen that nobody see this video, and we will explore the reasons why. Hardly anyone actually saw the video live, but it did have a wide distribution and many people outside New Zealand recorded it and have studied the content. These are the conclusions they have come up with. There is a mountain of ideas bouncing around the net, but nearly all are wrong. The pictures were most likely shot on a phone. The poor quality picture was the reason it looked like CGI, with items disappearing and appearing again. The video was real all and the terrible things that are shown are real. Of the five reviews I read of the video, all the reviewers showed a level of shock. The police were right to ban it. However, the video showed some significant information. Before I started this review, I saw a picture of a gunman who was at the site, and it was assumed was an extra shooter. The thing that surprised me was he was wearing red. This is not a colour that makes you blend in. As I gathered more info, it started to make sense. The colour red comes up again and again. The pictures show another man wearing red overalls. On his way to the site he stops, and a woman comes up to him and gets very close, and she is dressed in red as well. There were red cars everywhere. During the shooting, twice someone spoke to him. The first time saying 'watch your back' clearly, the second one was not so clear. Most of the victims were trapped in a room because the fire exits were jammed shut. That took a person on the outside to do that or incredibly bad luck, but it was not Tarrant. It was probably the taller man with blonde hair and the red shirt. One of the glass doors was broken and a few escaped. Once he had shot everyone in sight, he suddenly left the building to chase a woman who was fleeing. A car similar to the one Tarrant was driving that had been by the front door when he arrived was gone. That car was a Toyota Wells and the number plate was recognisable in the video. Someone was filming a police road block after the event and a Toyota Wells drove up the side of the queue of traffic, showed the officer something and was waved through. The car had the same number plate as the car in front of the mosque. He had to have got a message that this was happening. He races out and shoots her. The mosque had a fence around it, and these people in red were inside the fence and not shooting like everybody else. Then the most obvious reason it appears he was getting messages, for he suddenly runs around to the other side of the building which he could not see and shoots a man 40 metres away as he tries to escape out the back car park. It is then we see the man in red overalls. There were at least four different perpetrators involved. The man in the red shirt with a gun, the man with the red overalls and a woman in red who walked up to the car and possibly gave him something when he was stopped and Tarrant seen in the video. Tarrant then left the building and drove to the other Mosque, where things went wrong. A person at the mosque shot the man in the overalls dead, which caused the others and Tarrant to flee. They were being shot at by the person who had somehow got a gun and fired five shoots, according to a witness, Mark Nichols. This incident of the person getting the gun and had to shoot at the attacker was reported in the New Zealand Herald and other sources. One of New Zealand's main propaganda news outlets. (Someone was not in the loop.) There was a video of the man lying dead on the ground and being rolled over by a policeman's foot. There were survivors at the second mosque and multiple shooters were seen and one was said to be a woman. Why did Tarrant take the video when it would show exactly what happened, and it was not the act of a lone madman? I am sure he was not meant to take this video. Was this a cry from Tarrant that he was not responsible and was being made to commit the atrocity. This was a certainly a planned operation, and we could well see it end up in the highest levels of government. With the whole mind control story, there are some anomalies. However, the video showed some critical information. The video seems to showed how an MK ultra mass shooting works. It will be used as an example of how a false flag works with MK ultra for decades to come. The use of colours and music and how they are used to control the victim. The result of Mk ultra usage tends to level the victim stupefied and not able to carry out the attack with the effect the controllers need. They often have other shooters which have been caught on camera and by many eyewitnesses. Brenton carried this out easily by himself. This was a planned operation, and we could well see it end up in the highest levels of government. The gun that has been seen with the names of killers on it also had occult symbolism. His bag had the symbol of the black sun, an occult symbol of killing everything to bring new life. The shooting was carried out on the ides of March or the fifteenth, a significant day in occult symbolism. The number of deaths being 49 (7×7) and the changing to 50 (the year of celebration)important numbers in occult numerology.
Tarrant himself had NZ police/army issued body armour on. Now that's disturbing.
The video was purged from the world, but a USA video hoster called Brighteon as still showing several clips. They were threatened with closer, but not by anyone in New Zealand but by the Australian Intelligence Service. Brighteon had to move themselves out of the USA to keep their service going. Brighteon/Christchurch Shooting.
The rifles
There were supposed to be five rifles used. He had purchased four A category weapons from Gun City in Christchurch. These guns were purchased online. This is the first of three odd things about the rifles and licences. Buying a gun online is not like buying a cheap watch from China. Pay the money and it turns up. Forms need to be signed by the police and basically a time-consuming task and lots of contact with the police. It is much easier to go to a shop and Christchurch is only four hours by car for a $6000 dollar deal. The guns could have been bought in Dunedin. The AR-15 is an A category firearm under certain conditions or usually a military styled weapon that needs a special licence. You may know the AR-15 as the Armalite rifle from the Vietnam War. Some described it as the gun that lost the Vietnam War because of its unreliability. A normal AR-15 bares little resemblance to the one used. The particular AR-15 shown with all the marking was a Ruger made in the USA and readily available in New Zealand. It was this gun that was not bought at Gun City and the only one with the serial number removed. The second strange thing is why remove this number? The original gun licence is the really suspicious thing. A foreigner travelling to New Zealand cannot obtain a category A licence, they can only get a temporary E or D licence. It requires a home visit from police, and you need two referees, one being a family member. There is no way he could get a licence. As you will see, one of the reasons New Zealand does not have a gun problem is a highly competent police force. There may be some extremely diverse opinions about the leadership of the police, but the average police person is well-trained and highly competent. This licence situation could only happen as a criminal event.
That Manifesto. The Great Replacement.
The manifesto is nothing but clickbait. Written by at least three people and meant as a tool to get an agenda across. The manifesto is broken into three parts. The intro, where he establishes the white nationalist view point. A series of questions he poses to himself and then answers them. During these questions and answers, there seems to take a sudden change in the words and emotions he is writing about. Then a more summary type of conversation. The last part is an almost cut and paste of the uni bombers' manifesto. It is not written by him, so I won't discuss it. The first section has the appearance of something he has written just before he committed the act. The trouble is that the wording used has changed. The average person will not use more than two words of more than six letters in any sentence. People who use more than that have a much higher intellect. He was not a bright person who led an academic life. He worked as a personal trainer and a soldier. He would not have put a sentence together like this. “We must enviably correct the disaster of hedonistic, nihilistic individualism” or “even despite the ongoing effect of sub-replacement fertility, the population figures show the population figures do no decrease in line with sub-replacement fertility levels”. Someone added to the manifesto to create a narrative. This was written by someone else, but why or how this happened can only be speculated. He described New Zealand as a target rich environment and an easy target. Remember that statement for later on, it will come up again with a Mr Podesta. Despite the early white nationalist rhetoric, he then goes on to blame everybody else in the second part. Saying he is one thing or another, admires China for it has the best government. Calls himself a socialist. He has a go at everybody but Israel, a good soldier.
The Mossad
During the 2011 earthquake in Christchurch, part of a building landed on a car and one of the four occupants was killed. When the police turned up to help, they discovered the dead person had five passports from different countries. They were promptly arrested. It turned out they were Israeli Secret Service agents. They claimed they were here scouting out passports they could use. A minor infringement which does not explain why the then Prime Minister John Key received four phone calls from Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli Prime Minister. One of the world's more evil characters and heavily involved in the dark world of intelligence. Later as the plot thickens another even more evil character raises his head. What were they doing in New Zealand. Were they responsible for the attack or an indicator of the reasons this mosque was attacked? We are about to see they are innocent victims or are they martyrs in a fight for some cause.
The Mosques
The Al Noor Mosque is very controversial.
In 2013, two terrorists were killed in a drone strike in Afghanistan. When they investigated the bodies and who they were, they found two Europeans that had come from New Zealand. The parents of the two said they were radicalised at the Al Noor mosque. In 2014, they bought in a radical preacher who was preaching Jihad. There were complaints. These are just the things we know about, but for two European kiwis to be radicalised this must have been going on for a while. With many more preachers coming in and a lot of young Muslim's being sent overseas. Now we know why the Mossad was here. They had been there watching since 2011 at least. This raises whether they were innocent or how many were aware of their history and were they still pursuing it in some form. Was it the reason that that mosque was targeted. There would only have been two or three survivors from the first mosque. Which leaves far too many wounded at the second mosque. None of the numbers seem to stack up, but there were a large number. Are these innocent victims, or the martyrs in a fight for some cause. Whether other people believe in the cause or not, it was their cause and died in the promotion of it. Whether a front-line soldier or a logistical support person in some form. One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. They were helping people get to Afghanistan to help fight an invading force who were killing many people carelessly. There is no way the NZSIS did not know about these activities. From the first call to the police and Tarrant getting caught was 36 minutes. To get from one mosque to the other (about 7 km) you had to drive through the centre of town at 2.00 on Friday afternoon. A trip of fifteen minutes. Shoot about the same number of victims at the second mosque. Then travel about another 6 or 7 km to where he got caught. That's another 15 minutes. Eight minutes at each mosque, that gives a total of 46 minutes. Ten minutes to long. The report of different shooters at different mosques starts to make more sense. One last point about the mosque itself. It is about the reactions of the people. The panic and lack of leadership caused there to be far more deaths than what there should have been. They huddled in a corner and waited to be shot. It was quite unbelievable. There clearly needs to be a trained response to this kind of attack. A guide needs to be developed by the police.
The Police
New Zealand is a remarkably safe place to live, with a major reason for that going to a well-trained and competent Police Force. They are a force to be proud of and deserve all the honour, respect, and help we can give them. However, elements of the higher levels of the New Zealand police have been accused of being some of the most corrupt in the western world.
All police cars carry plenty of fire-power, so there was no need to go and suit up, so to speak. They got to the scene only a couple of minutes after Tarrant left. The first shooting was only eight minutes long, so for all the speed they were there 2 minutes too late. There were four people arrested who were carrying firearms, Three men and a woman. Tarrant was one. Another was a neighbour who was coming to the aid of the mosque but was stopped by police and arrested. Two others stopped at a police cordon carrying guns and arrested. Interestingly, one was a woman, they were armed. They were all released latter, but the man and woman stopped and arrested was one hell of a coincidence. To summarise, from the first call to Tarrant being arrested was 36 minutes. Then approx. another 9 mins until the last two attackers were caught. One was killed at the second mosque. A total of 45 minutes, now that's great police work. The only problem was: You can drive from one mosque to the second mosque and then to where Tarrant was stopped in 36 minutes at 10 am on a Tuesday morning, as I did. However, to do that at 2.30pm on a Friday afternoon in school traffic would be impossible.
When the French bombed the Rainbow Warrior, two of the three perpetrators were caught rapidly because they did not grasp how good NZ policing is. I went back and watched the police reports from Mike Bush, the Police Commissioner. He was unsure of the facts and did not seem to have a prepared narrative to drive home. Actually, he seemed a really decent bloke. Did not appear to be some kind of villain at all. Andrew Coster, on the other hand, was the Commissioner for Southern Police. If Tarrant had been able to purchase these guns and had not already been a person of interest, then Southern Police had to be the most incompetently run district in New Zealand. He would have been fully aware of the lies being told about the number of people killed. An incompetent liar yet was made New Zealand Police Commissioner when Mike Bush retired. WOW! Now that is corruption.
Media.
New Zealand media is nearly all overseas controlled. With the main television channel TV1 being a state broadcaster. Like BBC, Australian and Canadian state broadcasters, when it comes to leftist propaganda, they are leading the charge. The only good thing about TV1 is you can watch the news and find out what's not true. You don't know the truth, but you know the lie or the narrative. All the other media is owned by the banks or hedge funds, which are just an extension of the banks. The same people who own ASB, BNZ, ANZ and Westpac.
What did we get from them? Gun confiscation, white nationalism or anti nationalism and more censorship, the same totalitarian garbage we always get. They instantly linked Tarrant to Donald Trump and all the fake ideologies surrounding him. Numerous emotive pictures of Adern with lots of anti gun sentiment. In fact, there was open attack on anyone who did not adhere to the mainstream media narrative. Books banned, websites banned, one being Zero Hedge, a financial news outlet of all things, and people lost their employment for having some vague link to racist views. The way this has been scrubbed from everywhere except for the narrative version is quite spectacular. There is no place for discussion or other opinions. Agree or be vilified. Welcome to NZ media, the only place in the world with more propaganda than North Korea.
Legislation
There is now a mad dash to take away plenty of guns. All based on this incident with the call to make New Zealand safe. Will it make New Zealand safer? Let's look at the facts.
1 – New Zealand has a remarkably safe gun record. There are few incidents of people shooting each other in malice. What problems there are principally in the drug trade and this harm will still happen, guns or not. The police have done an excellent job and have made gun ownership a non issue in New Zealand.
2 – This person was not part of the NZ environment, but an outsider with the desire to kill as many people as possible. There are far better ways to kill numerous people than using a rifle. New Zealand has a massive farming industry with all the ingredients for high explosive fertiliser bombs. Maybe Jacinda Adern should ban farming. (Oh that's right she is)
3 – In the USA, with horrific gun crime, if you have a gun in your house you are eight times more likely to shoot yourself accidentally than someone shooting you with malice. In New Zealand, that figure is nearer 25 times. That is extremely rare. Therefore, any argument about gun safety in NZ is not one of being shot in malice but one of accident prevention. Gun related deaths in NZ are minimal, with 19 in the past ten years before this event. This is not a mistake, only 19 in 10 years in New Zealand's population of 5 million. It is estimated there are around two guns for every person. Nearly all the deaths are hunting accidents by people not identifying their targets or in the drug trade. Removing semi-automatic weapons would not have saved a single one of these lives. The two times there were mass shootings in NZ in living memory, both were done with bolt action rifles.
4 – So this bill won't stop terrorists and will not decrease the number of deaths from firearms. I am uncertain if the number of times firearms are presented when police attend incidents has increased, but that could well be true. What will it do? The gun industry is a multi-million dollar industry that employs thousands of people, so 75% of them can most likely expect to lose their jobs. There are around three hundred gun shops in New Zealand, so you could see half of them close with the destruction of their lives and their families' lives for nothing. Another scenario may arise where all the gun enthusiasts now have to buy new guns to fit the law. That would be a bonanza for the shops.
5- A similar gun stripping laws did nothing to stop deaths in Australia.
6- A person having a gun reduced the number of fatalities at the second mosque.
7- This is an attack on New Zealander's right to defend themselves against totalitarian government. To have an armed population is one of the fundamental foundations of freedom. Occasionally, we may require this freedom to be defended from invading forces. However, the people always have to defend themselves from oppressive government. We try to do this through the voting process, but when the voting becomes corrupted and your vote no longer counts, you reach a point where armed conflict arises. We could well be seeing this happening in France right now. This bill is a declaration of war on the people. The leader of the opposition described that passing this law was a no brainier, and he is right. You would have to have no brain to pass it.
Let us just reflect on this gun law. Start by removing the actual event and say it was a highly emotional event. Under these conditions, they ignored all the normal practices of select committees and public submission, and I am sure another 5 or 6 procedures. These procedures are in place to protect the people from out of control government. An American politician said we should be proud of how fast the law was enacted, but in fact they should be utterly ashamed. Ignored all normal practice because they were upset.
John Podesta
We are going to take a different direction now on the assumption that this was a planned event. Who could do it? How would you communicate it, and who would know of the event?
John Podesta is an American politician who is at the forefront of anti gun laws and social totalitarianism in the USA. Heavily involved in Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.
Five days before this event, John Podesta came to New Zealand and while he was here he did an interview on News Hub. One of the world's darker, more evil characters. He has been accused of being a paedophile and a Satanist. He states in the interview that the WikiLeaks scandal came out of nowhere and was a lie. But that was not true. Just from memory, I know of two cases where his name comes up in paedophile cases. The Podesta brothers have had accusations against them for decades. Not since 2016 with the WikiLeaks scandal. During the Madeline McCann disappearance in 2007, an identikit picture of two suspects was widely shown. It was pointed out the pictures showed remarkable resemblance to two well-known people often accused of being heavily involved in paedophilia, the Podesta brothers. The Podesta brothers were staying just a few kilometres away from where Madeline disappeared at that very same time. Police were questioned why they had not been interviewed. They were well known in paedophile circles at least nine years before Pizzagate. When Andrew Breitbart, the founder of the USA's biggest new outlet, was murdered for making accusations about paedophiles in 2011, it was John Podesta he was naming. His boss Hillary Clinton was in New Zealand in the last year and is due again this May 2019. Hillary Clinton has had many accusers of the same types of things over the decades as will. Though most of them are dead now. She was once described as the Queen of Evil, and John Podesta is an Arch Duke. John Podesta described New Zealand as a “Juicy target” not with worry but with glee, He also said New Zealand as a target rich environment and an easy target. These are almost identical to how Tarrant describes New Zealand in his manifesto. Then the interview took a strange turn. The camera panned down to his hands and took a close-up of his hand movements. His hand were not moving in a nervous fashion, but in a way that was clearly a signal to people. The signal was “it is going down”. Four days later, the shooting occurred. John Podesta is famously been shown with occult tattoos printed on his hands. The same occult symbols and numbers were on the rifles used. Stories that have come up again and again were that he had a clandestine meeting with Adern to inform her what was about to happen, and that the Mayor of Christchurch, Lianne Dalzel was also in the loop.
Jacinda Adren, NZ Prime Minister
Jacinda Adern behaviour during this whole event has been feeble. From a sceptical standpoint, she put on a good performance. When a country suffers a calamity of this proportion, we expect our leads to be the ones to stand tall. To keep calm and not make rash decisions. But what we saw from Adern was the very opposite. From a practical perspective, she really did panic and made poor practical decisions. Changing the gun laws through excessive anxiety that will, in fact, kill more people and not stop this kind of event happening again. What's going to happen when we get a massive crisis where ten's of thousands of lives are at stake? Is she going to hide under her desk and not stop crying? Is she having a re-occurrence of the anxiety problems that put her in a psychiatric unit when she was in the UK? Or is this all just for show. She also showed pitiful judgement in wearing head scarves. This bowing down to Islam is so unsupportive to women across the Muslin world, who suffer oppression. Every year, more than 50 women are killed in Saudi Arabia for being women. Much more in Pakistan. When they cry out from their oppression for help, to see a world leader submitting to the subjugation will hate the west more. Even though Jacinda leads the supposed workers/people's party, radical totalitarianism has very little to do with the good of the people. The EU is a good example of totalitarianism. They have no compassion for the worker or people in general. Another good example of this attitude towards ordinary people can be seen in the names that Adren stated hero Hillary Clinton called people, useless eaters, deplorable's and the sheeple. These days, the world is owned by an extremely rich elite who employ a myriad of bureaucrats with totalitarian powers. This is Globalism, where these people then try to protect themselves by taking away National powers, so they can live in a world above the law. They said when they arrested Julian Assange that nobody is above the law, but the whole point of Globalism is to make this elite group and their stooges can live above the law. Jacinda is one of these bureaucrats and takes her orders from the overseas elite. Look at Theresa May to see this kind of radical in action, they care nothing for people. The term Globalist is not held with the loathing it should be, there really needs to be a new name. The new gun laws most of existed already, it came out so fast. All standard tests of select committees and public submissions ignored. Under the cover of this story dominating the news, a Euthanasia bill was put before parliament. This bill is so bad it will put any older person in danger every time they visit a hospital. Now what is coming through are Draconian laws to restrict free speech. Are we really that asleep that they can think nothing of killing 50 innocent people to achieve their goals?
My opinion
This is only my opinion based on my search for facts regarding this shooting. The facts have mainly come from articles in the mainstream media. There are numerous options as to the reasons for this crime.
1- The mainstream narrative. That Tarrant was a lone psychopath and white nationalist who was able to kill numerous people. In the video, eyewitness reports show multiple shooters. He had no funds to travel the world or to life his style. The inconsistencies in the narrative make it nonsensical.
2- That it was a revenge killing by the Mossad. This would he out of character for them? There is lots of circumstantial evidence around that suggests them. They were aware that young people were being radicalised at that Mosque and being sent overseas to fight. Tarrant was a Jew. But I get the impression that if this went wrong, and they needed a new story, then a whole Jewish/ Antisemitism narrative was the back-up plan.
3- That this was a self-inflicted killing to use it for some agenda that only made sense in some pretty broken minds. There is no evidence pointing to this theory.
4- The inside job. This is a false flag event that has a very malevolent agenda. The most likely organisers of this event are the Australian SIS. It makes no difference what party is meeting their agenda. The NZSIS is A-political and has not worked in New Zealand's interest or even for New Zealand in a very long time. It is a foreign agency. This event was arranged from overseas in typical false flag style. Crisis-reason-solution is the way it always happens and very fast while peoples emotions are stirred up. This one was done very fast and poorly prepared. Maybe they thought that because New Zealand has no free press to speak of, that they could get away with it. The ruling political party was Globalist and the Prime Minister a radicalised totalitarian capable of anything. Clinton and Podesta's involvement is frightening, as they are a Globalist group that is renowned for its awful sexual depravity. These people have been buying large amounts of land in the South Island, as has been reported for a long time now. It was always thought that they were doing this to have a safe haven in the face of financial collapse.
What worries me is this may not have been carried out as some ideological tenet where they get a bigger kick out of the people being defenseless. Are they aware of some major event going to take place that will cause an uprising by the people? A collapse of the US dollar that will make the US banks close down. All the main Australian banks are owned by the US banks, and nearly all NZ banks are owned by Australian banks. What happens when you cannot get food. There certainly are enough doomsdays out there claiming catastrophic events are about to happen. It certainly looks that way.
I will finish with what JFK said, “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable. Remember this moment in time. This is the point that the coming civil war became inevitable. Maybe they will just poison us all with some toxic vaccine.
Warwick